<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Geek Out: How Facebook Scales Chat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/05/15/geek-out-how-facebook-scales-chat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/15/geek-out-how-facebook-scales-chat/</link>
	<description>The Business of Technology</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 04:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cyndy Aleo-Carreira</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/15/geek-out-how-facebook-scales-chat/#comment-878579</link>
		<dc:creator>Cyndy Aleo-Carreira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 23:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13440#comment-878579</guid>
		<description>My problem with their claims of scaling with Facebook chat are the hyperbole involved. They are claiming that chat is used with every user account, even accounts that are abandoned. There are also many of us who either refuse to use it, or use an unsupported browser (like Camino). I'd like to see the actual numbers of how many active users are utilizing the chat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My problem with their claims of scaling with Facebook chat are the hyperbole involved. They are claiming that chat is used with every user account, even accounts that are abandoned. There are also many of us who either refuse to use it, or use an unsupported browser (like Camino). I&#8217;d like to see the actual numbers of how many active users are utilizing the chat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
