<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Buying CNet Makes Sense for CBS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/05/15/cbs-buys-cnet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/15/cbs-buys-cnet/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:01:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laptops Press Latest Laptops News - Reviews - Deals &#187; TV.com App Streams Major Network Content to iPhone</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/15/cbs-buys-cnet/#comment-201409</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Laptops Press Latest Laptops News - Reviews - Deals &#187; TV.com App Streams Major Network Content to iPhone]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 13:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13438#comment-201409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] video content. CBS is the network in question, which must&#8217;ve gotten tech savvy when they acquired CNET a little while ago. They&#8217;re offering content, including full episodes, via the recently [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] video content. CBS is the network in question, which must&#8217;ve gotten tech savvy when they acquired CNET a little while ago. They&#8217;re offering content, including full episodes, via the recently [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TV.com App Streams Major Network Content to iPhone - TheAppleBlog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/15/cbs-buys-cnet/#comment-201408</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TV.com App Streams Major Network Content to iPhone - TheAppleBlog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13438#comment-201408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] video content. CBS is the network in question, who must&#8217;ve gotten tech savvy when they acquired CNET a little while ago. They&#8217;re offering content, including full episodes, via the recently [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] video content. CBS is the network in question, who must&#8217;ve gotten tech savvy when they acquired CNET a little while ago. They&#8217;re offering content, including full episodes, via the recently [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CBS Interactive Cuts Jobs. C/Net, Last.fm Impacted</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/15/cbs-buys-cnet/#comment-201407</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CBS Interactive Cuts Jobs. C/Net, Last.fm Impacted]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 06:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13438#comment-201407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the time of their merger, I wrote that buying CNET made a lot of sense for CBS. Now, looking back in the rear-view mirror, it doesn’t seem like [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the time of their merger, I wrote that buying CNET made a lot of sense for CBS. Now, looking back in the rear-view mirror, it doesn’t seem like [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CBS Interactive Cuts: As Much As 20 Percent - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/15/cbs-buys-cnet/#comment-201406</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CBS Interactive Cuts: As Much As 20 Percent - GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 01:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13438#comment-201406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the time of their merger, I wrote buying C/Net made a lot of sense for CBS. Now, looking back in the rear view mirror it doesn’t seem like [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the time of their merger, I wrote buying C/Net made a lot of sense for CBS. Now, looking back in the rear view mirror it doesn’t seem like [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charles</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/15/cbs-buys-cnet/#comment-201405</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[charles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 16:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13438#comment-201405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was also rumored that Jana Partners, Google and Yahoo wants to buy CNET before CBS came in. And you are right, it might be a good acquisition. This site was part of the acquisition right? And hope alot of improvement will be observed.

Thanks
Charles
resourcesandmoney.blogspot.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was also rumored that Jana Partners, Google and Yahoo wants to buy CNET before CBS came in. And you are right, it might be a good acquisition. This site was part of the acquisition right? And hope alot of improvement will be observed.</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Charles<br />
resourcesandmoney.blogspot.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Complete List of Q2 2008 Web / Internet / Tech Acquisitions &#187; The StartUp Blog at PartnerUp</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/15/cbs-buys-cnet/#comment-201404</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Complete List of Q2 2008 Web / Internet / Tech Acquisitions &#187; The StartUp Blog at PartnerUp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 20:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13438#comment-201404</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Networks is a publicly held media company with a focus on technology.  TechCrunch &#124; Mashable   GigaOm  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Networks is a publicly held media company with a focus on technology.  TechCrunch | Mashable   GigaOm  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wired compra Ars Technica y la CBS a Cnet</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/15/cbs-buys-cnet/#comment-201403</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wired compra Ars Technica y la CBS a Cnet]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 16:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13438#comment-201403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] &#124; Techcrunch Más información &#124; Gigaom   trackback    ¿Recomendarías este post?      Más noticias sobre: Empresas, Protagonistas  Tags: [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] | Techcrunch Más información | Gigaom   trackback    ¿Recomendarías este post?      Más noticias sobre: Empresas, Protagonistas  Tags: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CBS to buy CNET for $1.8 billion &#124;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/15/cbs-buys-cnet/#comment-201402</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CBS to buy CNET for $1.8 billion &#124;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 17:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13438#comment-201402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the integration of CBS Sports with CNET and GameSport, the male-oriented sites…” Plus Why the deal makes sense for CBS, and conversely, why it’s the “worst M&amp;A deal of the year.” Pro20.com&#039;s View: [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the integration of CBS Sports with CNET and GameSport, the male-oriented sites…” Plus Why the deal makes sense for CBS, and conversely, why it’s the “worst M&amp;A deal of the year.” Pro20.com&#8217;s View: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/15/cbs-buys-cnet/#comment-201401</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 11:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13438#comment-201401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Buying a broken brand at 45% premium is somewhat dodgy. CBS would be foolish not to steal that domain away from C&#124;Net’s tech news site and use it for CBS News instead.

http://www.gofrostfire.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buying a broken brand at 45% premium is somewhat dodgy. CBS would be foolish not to steal that domain away from C|Net’s tech news site and use it for CBS News instead.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.gofrostfire.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.gofrostfire.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flash P2P: Now That&#8217;s Disruptive - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/15/cbs-buys-cnet/#comment-201400</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Flash P2P: Now That&#8217;s Disruptive - GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 04:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13438#comment-201400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 2008 at 3:45 PM PT Comments (0)    Don&#8217;t blame me for getting caught up in the whole hoopla around media-buying-media&#8230;we media types are known for being narcissists. Blame me for not being able to blog about the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2008 at 3:45 PM PT Comments (0)    Don&#8217;t blame me for getting caught up in the whole hoopla around media-buying-media&#8230;we media types are known for being narcissists. Blame me for not being able to blog about the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T R</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/15/cbs-buys-cnet/#comment-201399</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T R]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 01:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13438#comment-201399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Om-

Do you think this will make one of the other large media companies like Disney/ABC or NBC Universal suddenly interested in buying Yahoo?

Despite the AOL-Time Warner disaster, I see one of those companies being a better fit for Yahoo than Microsoft.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Om-</p>
<p>Do you think this will make one of the other large media companies like Disney/ABC or NBC Universal suddenly interested in buying Yahoo?</p>
<p>Despite the AOL-Time Warner disaster, I see one of those companies being a better fit for Yahoo than Microsoft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quincy Smith Q&#38;A: CNET, EQAL, Embeds &#171; NewTeeVee</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/15/cbs-buys-cnet/#comment-201398</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Quincy Smith Q&#38;A: CNET, EQAL, Embeds &#171; NewTeeVee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 00:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13438#comment-201398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Smith Q&amp;A: CNET, EQAL,&#160;Embeds  Everyone&#8217;s weighed in on CBS&#8217; $1.8 billion acquisition of CNET, but no one&#8217;s really talking about how the deal impacts their web video efforts. Liz thinks [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Smith Q&#38;A: CNET, EQAL,&nbsp;Embeds  Everyone&#8217;s weighed in on CBS&#8217; $1.8 billion acquisition of CNET, but no one&#8217;s really talking about how the deal impacts their web video efforts. Liz thinks [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quincy Smith Q&#38;A: CNET, EQAL, Embeds &#171; NewTeeVee</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/15/cbs-buys-cnet/#comment-210733</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Quincy Smith Q&#38;A: CNET, EQAL, Embeds &#171; NewTeeVee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 00:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13438#comment-210733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Smith Q&amp;A: CNET, EQAL,&#160;Embeds  Everyone&#8217;s weighed in on CBS&#8217; $1.8 billion acquisition of CNET, but no one&#8217;s really talking about how the deal impacts their web video efforts. Liz thinks [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Smith Q&#38;A: CNET, EQAL,&nbsp;Embeds  Everyone&#8217;s weighed in on CBS&#8217; $1.8 billion acquisition of CNET, but no one&#8217;s really talking about how the deal impacts their web video efforts. Liz thinks [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ancestraltraveler</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/15/cbs-buys-cnet/#comment-201397</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ancestraltraveler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 22:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13438#comment-201397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While CBS has acquired some valuable Internet real estate (News.com, Radio.com, Search.com to name a few)for Quincy Smith to develop, they will not have control of The Whole Damn Net.com  Not for the time being. Sorry CBS, but as much as I know you&#039;d love to lay claim and lord over The Whole Damn Net through CBS Interactive, Mark Cuban currently has the inside track to claim it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While CBS has acquired some valuable Internet real estate (News.com, Radio.com, Search.com to name a few)for Quincy Smith to develop, they will not have control of The Whole Damn Net.com  Not for the time being. Sorry CBS, but as much as I know you&#8217;d love to lay claim and lord over The Whole Damn Net through CBS Interactive, Mark Cuban currently has the inside track to claim it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Sigal</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/15/cbs-buys-cnet/#comment-201396</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Sigal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 22:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13438#comment-201396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On paper, I love this deal for the reasons that you assert.  This is a broken brand with a bruised culture but good and varied media properties.  It needs a new heart but not necessarily a new brain.

As is the challenge in deals like this, it is all about integration and figuring out what the hell synergy means relative to CBS&#039; digital media/broadcast media universe.

I like what I have seen of CBS&#039; approach between baby steps in bleeding edge and bigger steps like this.  What I have less of a sense of is CBS&#039; uber vision and how they plan to orchestrate in a more than the sum of the parts fashion.

Cheers,

Mark]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On paper, I love this deal for the reasons that you assert.  This is a broken brand with a bruised culture but good and varied media properties.  It needs a new heart but not necessarily a new brain.</p>
<p>As is the challenge in deals like this, it is all about integration and figuring out what the hell synergy means relative to CBS&#8217; digital media/broadcast media universe.</p>
<p>I like what I have seen of CBS&#8217; approach between baby steps in bleeding edge and bigger steps like this.  What I have less of a sense of is CBS&#8217; uber vision and how they plan to orchestrate in a more than the sum of the parts fashion.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott K</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/15/cbs-buys-cnet/#comment-201395</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott K]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 22:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13438#comment-201395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting and slightly off-topic thought:

CBS will now own the domain “news.com”. CBS would be foolish not to steal that domain away from C&#124;Net&#039;s tech news site and use it for CBS News instead.

C&#124;Net also owns tons of other very valuable domain names such as &quot;search.com&quot;.  It&#039;s a shame they never did much with them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting and slightly off-topic thought:</p>
<p>CBS will now own the domain “news.com”. CBS would be foolish not to steal that domain away from C|Net&#8217;s tech news site and use it for CBS News instead.</p>
<p>C|Net also owns tons of other very valuable domain names such as &#8220;search.com&#8221;.  It&#8217;s a shame they never did much with them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

