<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Now Vonage Will Also Sell Broadband</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/05/08/vonage-broadband/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/08/vonage-broadband/</link>
	<description>Tracking the Internet Evolution</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 22:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/08/vonage-broadband/#comment-877619</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 17:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13351#comment-877619</guid>
		<description>I think it's a great move to combine the two, although I have never been a fan of Cobad, but maybe they have improved in recent years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s a great move to combine the two, although I have never been a fan of Cobad, but maybe they have improved in recent years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Coseven</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/08/vonage-broadband/#comment-877578</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Coseven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 13:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13351#comment-877578</guid>
		<description>Om, agree with your plateau concern.  Applying your brand to a resale of resale with no control of the service quality is daft.  Vonage may be better off focusing on improving the voice calling experience.  Being standards-based, it should have an advantage over Skype, but it has never tried to go this direction.

Vonage has a similar problem to Tivo.  It requires a facilities operator, which competes against it with a bundled product.  Tivo's long-term hope is to provide a branded experience on top of the MSO STB.  Maybe Vonage could try a similar approach.  The conversion to IMS/PCMM2 would seem to favor Vonage, if they could come to a business arrangement.  If Tivo can work with Comcast, why couldn't Vonage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Om, agree with your plateau concern.  Applying your brand to a resale of resale with no control of the service quality is daft.  Vonage may be better off focusing on improving the voice calling experience.  Being standards-based, it should have an advantage over Skype, but it has never tried to go this direction.</p>
<p>Vonage has a similar problem to Tivo.  It requires a facilities operator, which competes against it with a bundled product.  Tivo&#8217;s long-term hope is to provide a branded experience on top of the MSO STB.  Maybe Vonage could try a similar approach.  The conversion to IMS/PCMM2 would seem to favor Vonage, if they could come to a business arrangement.  If Tivo can work with Comcast, why couldn&#8217;t Vonage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noel Huelsenbeck</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/08/vonage-broadband/#comment-877540</link>
		<dc:creator>Noel Huelsenbeck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 06:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13351#comment-877540</guid>
		<description>On the bright side you eliminate the finger pointing when trouble shooting. Instead staying on hold for 20 minutes with Vonage and then having them tell you it's your broadband connection, then calling Covad and staying on hold for 20 minutes, and having them tell you it's your VoIP provider. Vonage will probably just put you on hold forever why they try to figure it out. 

To be fair I only used Vonage as a pilot project for a few months several years ago. My experience with their customer service was dreadful, that may have changed in the last couple of years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the bright side you eliminate the finger pointing when trouble shooting. Instead staying on hold for 20 minutes with Vonage and then having them tell you it&#8217;s your broadband connection, then calling Covad and staying on hold for 20 minutes, and having them tell you it&#8217;s your VoIP provider. Vonage will probably just put you on hold forever why they try to figure it out. </p>
<p>To be fair I only used Vonage as a pilot project for a few months several years ago. My experience with their customer service was dreadful, that may have changed in the last couple of years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/08/vonage-broadband/#comment-877526</link>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 04:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13351#comment-877526</guid>
		<description>@ Tom and @Partike, 

While I agree with you, I think this is a good move for Vonage needs to shore up its customer base. The subscriber base is going to plateau. the new additions are slowing down. Maybe DSL helps convince others to sign-up?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Tom and @Partike, </p>
<p>While I agree with you, I think this is a good move for Vonage needs to shore up its customer base. The subscriber base is going to plateau. the new additions are slowing down. Maybe DSL helps convince others to sign-up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/08/vonage-broadband/#comment-877484</link>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 21:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13351#comment-877484</guid>
		<description>@ Andrew.... Ouch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Andrew&#8230;. Ouch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Norton</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/08/vonage-broadband/#comment-877451</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Norton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 19:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13351#comment-877451</guid>
		<description>Covad is a horrible service provider coupled with Vonage is it a marriage made in hell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Covad is a horrible service provider coupled with Vonage is it a marriage made in hell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Goldman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/08/vonage-broadband/#comment-877445</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Goldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 19:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13351#comment-877445</guid>
		<description>Maybe Vonage could be the first company to be allowed to resell Covad business voice? 

Heh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe Vonage could be the first company to be allowed to resell Covad business voice? </p>
<p>Heh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parkite</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/08/vonage-broadband/#comment-877433</link>
		<dc:creator>Parkite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 17:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13351#comment-877433</guid>
		<description>A resale (Covad) of a resale (incumbent copper)?  Seems like a low margin endeavor fraught with service quality issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A resale (Covad) of a resale (incumbent copper)?  Seems like a low margin endeavor fraught with service quality issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Coseven</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/08/vonage-broadband/#comment-877428</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Coseven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 17:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13351#comment-877428</guid>
		<description>How's Earthlink doing reselling broadband?  Why do think this FVNO will turn out any better than the recent MVNO flame outs?  Wouldn't Vonage be better off to start with a simpler QoS deal with Covad, that didn't require Vonage to bill and support low-margin dsl service?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How&#8217;s Earthlink doing reselling broadband?  Why do think this FVNO will turn out any better than the recent MVNO flame outs?  Wouldn&#8217;t Vonage be better off to start with a simpler QoS deal with Covad, that didn&#8217;t require Vonage to bill and support low-margin dsl service?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve ballmer</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/08/vonage-broadband/#comment-877426</link>
		<dc:creator>steve ballmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 17:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13351#comment-877426</guid>
		<description>Vonage needs to do something legal for a change!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vonage needs to do something legal for a change!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/08/vonage-broadband/#comment-877407</link>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 15:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13351#comment-877407</guid>
		<description>@ Brian, 

I am betting that is indeed their motivation. I think it is the right approach to take.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Brian, </p>
<p>I am betting that is indeed their motivation. I think it is the right approach to take.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/08/vonage-broadband/#comment-877403</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 15:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13351#comment-877403</guid>
		<description>If it were not for the frivolous lawsuits by Verizon and others trying to strangle with stupid patents, Vonage would have earned even more. If they offer good broad band speeds, many will switch in a hurry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it were not for the frivolous lawsuits by Verizon and others trying to strangle with stupid patents, Vonage would have earned even more. If they offer good broad band speeds, many will switch in a hurry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Hart</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/08/vonage-broadband/#comment-877402</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Hart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 15:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13351#comment-877402</guid>
		<description>Would this relationship with Covad now allow Vonage to guarantee a certain quality of service for phone calls?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would this relationship with Covad now allow Vonage to guarantee a certain quality of service for phone calls?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
