<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sprint&#039;s Xohm and Backhaul Bottleneck</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/05/02/sprints-xohm-and-backhaul-bottleneck/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/02/sprints-xohm-and-backhaul-bottleneck/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 01:14:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Пресата presata.com&#187; Blog Archive &#187; Giz Explains: Why Cellphone Reception Still Sucks [Giz Explains]</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/02/sprints-xohm-and-backhaul-bottleneck/#comment-200493</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Пресата presata.com&#187; Blog Archive &#187; Giz Explains: Why Cellphone Reception Still Sucks [Giz Explains]]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 19:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13294#comment-200493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] is the best, obviously, but most towers still use an array of T1 lines. And that bottleneck, as Om pointed out last year, could be mobile broadband&#8217;s biggest roadblock. Assuming you get past all those other [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is the best, obviously, but most towers still use an array of T1 lines. And that bottleneck, as Om pointed out last year, could be mobile broadband&#8217;s biggest roadblock. Assuming you get past all those other [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xohm WiMax Finally Gets Going with Limited Service - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/02/sprints-xohm-and-backhaul-bottleneck/#comment-200492</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xohm WiMax Finally Gets Going with Limited Service - GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 13:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13294#comment-200492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Higginbotham, Monday, September 29, 2008 at 6:40 AM PT Comments (0)    After six months of waiting and few leaked launch dates, Sprint launched commercial availability for its Xohm WiMax network in [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Higginbotham, Monday, September 29, 2008 at 6:40 AM PT Comments (0)    After six months of waiting and few leaked launch dates, Sprint launched commercial availability for its Xohm WiMax network in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Boston, Philly, Dallas next for Sprint&#8217;s WiMax Sidecut Reports</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/02/sprints-xohm-and-backhaul-bottleneck/#comment-200491</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#187; Boston, Philly, Dallas next for Sprint&#8217;s WiMax Sidecut Reports]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 23:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13294#comment-200491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] to West, Sprint has solved just about all the problems it had faced earlier in getting the right amount of backhaul services to WiMax towers, in part by adopting some of the microwave-backhaul techniques of its imminent [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to West, Sprint has solved just about all the problems it had faced earlier in getting the right amount of backhaul services to WiMax towers, in part by adopting some of the microwave-backhaul techniques of its imminent [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; What&#8217;s Next for the New Clearwire? Sidecut Reports</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/02/sprints-xohm-and-backhaul-bottleneck/#comment-200490</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#187; What&#8217;s Next for the New Clearwire? Sidecut Reports]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 00:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13294#comment-200490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] launch,&#8221; and lame excuses like not figuring out how to get enough microwave engineers or backhaul into towers weren&#8217;t cutting it. Now there are some valid excuses for pushing soft launches back a few [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] launch,&#8221; and lame excuses like not figuring out how to get enough microwave engineers or backhaul into towers weren&#8217;t cutting it. Now there are some valid excuses for pushing soft launches back a few [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; AT&#38;T: Our 3G Goes to Eleven Sidecut Reports</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/02/sprints-xohm-and-backhaul-bottleneck/#comment-200489</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#187; AT&#38;T: Our 3G Goes to Eleven Sidecut Reports]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 19:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13294#comment-200489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] if any hardware modifications to the company&#8217;s infrastructure,&#8221; there has been widespread questioning of late whether or not network providers have sufficient backhaul to supply the wireless-data [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] if any hardware modifications to the company&#8217;s infrastructure,&#8221; there has been widespread questioning of late whether or not network providers have sufficient backhaul to supply the wireless-data [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; AT&#38;T: Our 3G Goes to Eleven Sidecut Reports</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/02/sprints-xohm-and-backhaul-bottleneck/#comment-210726</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#187; AT&#38;T: Our 3G Goes to Eleven Sidecut Reports]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 19:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13294#comment-210726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] if any hardware modifications to the company&#8217;s infrastructure,&#8221; there has been widespread questioning of late whether or not network providers have sufficient backhaul to supply the wireless-data [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] if any hardware modifications to the company&#8217;s infrastructure,&#8221; there has been widespread questioning of late whether or not network providers have sufficient backhaul to supply the wireless-data [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mobile Back Haul Equals Big Money Opportunity - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/02/sprints-xohm-and-backhaul-bottleneck/#comment-200488</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mobile Back Haul Equals Big Money Opportunity - GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 05:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13294#comment-200488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] has issued a report which forecasts 4.4 billion mobile subscribers worldwide by 2011, and their needs will push the demand for wireless backhaul equipment to over $10 billion by that year. Infonetics predicts [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has issued a report which forecasts 4.4 billion mobile subscribers worldwide by 2011, and their needs will push the demand for wireless backhaul equipment to over $10 billion by that year. Infonetics predicts [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fonearama &#187; Sprint, Clearwire Mull $12 Billion Joint-“Miserable Failure”</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/02/sprints-xohm-and-backhaul-bottleneck/#comment-200487</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fonearama &#187; Sprint, Clearwire Mull $12 Billion Joint-“Miserable Failure”]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 02:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13294#comment-200487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] said, the deal is not without its problems–top among them WiMax itself. As Craig Moffett, an analyst with Bernstein Research, explained in a note to clients earlier this [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] said, the deal is not without its problems–top among them WiMax itself. As Craig Moffett, an analyst with Bernstein Research, explained in a note to clients earlier this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sprint, Clearwire Mull $12 Billion Joint-&#8221;Miserable Failure&#8221; &#124; John Paczkowski &#124; Digital Daily &#124; AllThingsD</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/02/sprints-xohm-and-backhaul-bottleneck/#comment-200486</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sprint, Clearwire Mull $12 Billion Joint-&#8221;Miserable Failure&#8221; &#124; John Paczkowski &#124; Digital Daily &#124; AllThingsD]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 23:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13294#comment-200486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] said, the deal is not without its problems&#8211;top among them WiMax itself. As Craig Moffett, an analyst with Bernstein Research, explained in a research note to clients [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] said, the deal is not without its problems&#8211;top among them WiMax itself. As Craig Moffett, an analyst with Bernstein Research, explained in a research note to clients [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: techboy2000</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/05/02/sprints-xohm-and-backhaul-bottleneck/#comment-200485</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[techboy2000]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 04:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13294#comment-200485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Business is so strange today.  Math and due diligence seems passé.

Each base station usually has a couple stinking T1s for backhaul (Not good enough for WiMax broadband).
The upgrade will be:
    Expensive
    Will take a long time to provision the new backhaul lines
    Will require configuration (more time delay)

Ok, now we have our network up and enormous new costs but NO CUSTOMERS.  Adding a handful of business customers with WiMax laptop data cards will not pay for the network.  You still need a lot of handsets on the network.  I have not seen a single WiMax handset.

Solution:
    Beg Verizon to buy Sprint
    Fire the employees/consultants that created the farcical spreadsheets showing WiMax short term profitability
    Fire management that believed the spreadsheets
    Hire a new outside management team who can actually implement the transfer of Nextel customers to Sprint
    Punt and go to LTE in a few years]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Business is so strange today.  Math and due diligence seems passé.</p>
<p>Each base station usually has a couple stinking T1s for backhaul (Not good enough for WiMax broadband).<br />
The upgrade will be:<br />
    Expensive<br />
    Will take a long time to provision the new backhaul lines<br />
    Will require configuration (more time delay)</p>
<p>Ok, now we have our network up and enormous new costs but NO CUSTOMERS.  Adding a handful of business customers with WiMax laptop data cards will not pay for the network.  You still need a lot of handsets on the network.  I have not seen a single WiMax handset.</p>
<p>Solution:<br />
    Beg Verizon to buy Sprint<br />
    Fire the employees/consultants that created the farcical spreadsheets showing WiMax short term profitability<br />
    Fire management that believed the spreadsheets<br />
    Hire a new outside management team who can actually implement the transfer of Nextel customers to Sprint<br />
    Punt and go to LTE in a few years</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
