<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Time Warner Begins Death by 1,000 Cuts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/04/30/time-warner-begins-death-by-1000-cuts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/30/time-warner-begins-death-by-1000-cuts/</link>
	<description>Tracking the Internet Evolution</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 03:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Time Warner Reaps $9.25B From Cable Split - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/30/time-warner-begins-death-by-1000-cuts/#comment-879343</link>
		<dc:creator>Time Warner Reaps $9.25B From Cable Split - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 13:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13252#comment-879343</guid>
		<description>[...] May 21, 2008 at 6:49 AM PT Comments (0)    Executives at Time Warner concerned with how to spin out its Time Warner Cable division seemed to believe that saddling a cash-generating business in an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] May 21, 2008 at 6:49 AM PT Comments (0)    Executives at Time Warner concerned with how to spin out its Time Warner Cable division seemed to believe that saddling a cash-generating business in an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why the Job Cuts at Fortune Are More Shocking Than Usual / Jossip</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/30/time-warner-begins-death-by-1000-cuts/#comment-878123</link>
		<dc:creator>Why the Job Cuts at Fortune Are More Shocking Than Usual / Jossip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 13:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13252#comment-878123</guid>
		<description>[...] there, after cutting 450 New Line jobs as it folds the brand into Warner Bros. Jeff Bewkes is also splitting from its cable division. And the company&#8217;s HBO unit is even hiking prices on iTunes downloads to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] there, after cutting 450 New Line jobs as it folds the brand into Warner Bros. Jeff Bewkes is also splitting from its cable division. And the company&#8217;s HBO unit is even hiking prices on iTunes downloads to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Between the Lines mobile edition</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/30/time-warner-begins-death-by-1000-cuts/#comment-876362</link>
		<dc:creator>Between the Lines mobile edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 10:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13252#comment-876362</guid>
		<description>[...] GigaOm: Time Warner Begins Death by 1,000 Cuts [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] GigaOm: Time Warner Begins Death by 1,000 Cuts [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Hatch&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2008-05-01</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/30/time-warner-begins-death-by-1000-cuts/#comment-876345</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Hatch&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2008-05-01</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 05:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13252#comment-876345</guid>
		<description>[...] Time Warner Begins Death by 1,000 Cuts - GigaOM &#8220;Like an aging matron, Time Warner appears to be taking refuge in the arms of old Hollywood.&#8221; (tags: time media business enterprise internet AOL) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Time Warner Begins Death by 1,000 Cuts - GigaOM &#8220;Like an aging matron, Time Warner appears to be taking refuge in the arms of old Hollywood.&#8221; (tags: time media business enterprise internet AOL) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Desmond Haynes, Jr.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/30/time-warner-begins-death-by-1000-cuts/#comment-876289</link>
		<dc:creator>Desmond Haynes, Jr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 18:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13252#comment-876289</guid>
		<description>"flailing Platform A advertising business"? Come on, don't shoot just coz you have to! Give the company some time to get its act together in the ad space? How long did it take google to get Adsense going completely well?

AOL has TW legacy and bosses to please. Pity the 2001 merger even happened!

AOL is in the right track. Just give them time. And with MicroHoo happening, it is a good opp for them to shape up too!

I, for one, would wait and watch.
-D
http://techwatch.reviewk.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;flailing Platform A advertising business&#8221;? Come on, don&#8217;t shoot just coz you have to! Give the company some time to get its act together in the ad space? How long did it take google to get Adsense going completely well?</p>
<p>AOL has TW legacy and bosses to please. Pity the 2001 merger even happened!</p>
<p>AOL is in the right track. Just give them time. And with MicroHoo happening, it is a good opp for them to shape up too!</p>
<p>I, for one, would wait and watch.<br />
-D<br />
 (<a href="http://techwatch.reviewk.com/" rel="nofollow">link</a>) </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Time Warner Defies Subscriber Expectations &#171; NewTeeVee</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/30/time-warner-begins-death-by-1000-cuts/#comment-876265</link>
		<dc:creator>Time Warner Defies Subscriber Expectations &#171; NewTeeVee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13252#comment-876265</guid>
		<description>[...] largest in the country (our pal Stacey at GigaOM says its the beginning of Time Warner&#8217;s death by 1,000 cuts). But the other, not-quite-as-big-but-still-big news from the earnings call was that Time Warner [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] largest in the country (our pal Stacey at GigaOM says its the beginning of Time Warner&#8217;s death by 1,000 cuts). But the other, not-quite-as-big-but-still-big news from the earnings call was that Time Warner [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Leebow</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/30/time-warner-begins-death-by-1000-cuts/#comment-876264</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Leebow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13252#comment-876264</guid>
		<description>Way back in 1997, I thought TW would "own" the Internet. If you look at its site: http://www.pathfinder.com (at one time it was operational), you'll see TW has a lot of content. Unfortunately, it never parlayed it into an Internet powerhouse. 

I guess this proves that content is not necessarily King.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way back in 1997, I thought TW would &#8220;own&#8221; the Internet. If you look at its site:  (<a href="http://www.pathfinder.com" rel="nofollow">link</a>)  (at one time it was operational), you&#8217;ll see TW has a lot of content. Unfortunately, it never parlayed it into an Internet powerhouse. </p>
<p>I guess this proves that content is not necessarily King.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/30/time-warner-begins-death-by-1000-cuts/#comment-876263</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 14:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=13252#comment-876263</guid>
		<description>Don't understand why "the logical next step" is to divest magazines (pure content biz with strong online presence). Big difference between that and access (cable/dialup).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t understand why &#8220;the logical next step&#8221; is to divest magazines (pure content biz with strong online presence). Big difference between that and access (cable/dialup).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
