<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will the DoD Fight Apple Over P.A. Semi?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/04/24/will-dod-fight-apple-over-pa-semi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/24/will-dod-fight-apple-over-pa-semi/</link>
	<description>Tracking the Internet Evolution</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 11:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Apple iPhone SDK - Department of Defense Unhappy With Apple Chip Company Purchase &#124; iFones.com - Apple iPhone App Reviews</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/24/will-dod-fight-apple-over-pa-semi/#comment-876632</link>
		<dc:creator>Apple iPhone SDK - Department of Defense Unhappy With Apple Chip Company Purchase &#124; iFones.com - Apple iPhone App Reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 09:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/04/24/will-dod-fight-apple-over-pa-semi/#comment-876632</guid>
		<description>[...] It&#8217;s possible the licensing issues could get worked out to maintain supply &#8220;on an end-of-life basis&#8221; but in that same statement, P.A. noted that their buyer (Apple) wasn&#8217;t interested in their products or roadmap, just their IP and engineering skills. Which means Apple has no interest in anything their currently making or about to make, despite Blam&#8217;s reasonable assumption that was the case. So it&#8217;s all about their design chops, or they really are just a bargaining chip. [EETimes via GigaOM] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It&#8217;s possible the licensing issues could get worked out to maintain supply &#8220;on an end-of-life basis&#8221; but in that same statement, P.A. noted that their buyer (Apple) wasn&#8217;t interested in their products or roadmap, just their IP and engineering skills. Which means Apple has no interest in anything their currently making or about to make, despite Blam&#8217;s reasonable assumption that was the case. So it&#8217;s all about their design chops, or they really are just a bargaining chip. [EETimes via GigaOM] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Wilensky</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/24/will-dod-fight-apple-over-pa-semi/#comment-872901</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Wilensky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 22:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/04/24/will-dod-fight-apple-over-pa-semi/#comment-872901</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Since all of the PA Semi finished units are produced by outside fabs, existing products will surely be available under license.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since all of the PA Semi finished units are produced by outside fabs, existing products will surely be available under license.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
