<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IBM&#8217;s New Servers for Cloud Computing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/04/23/ibms-new-servers-for-cloud-computing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/23/ibms-new-servers-for-cloud-computing/</link>
	<description>The Business of Technology</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 11:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: HP Weds Cloud and High-performance Computing - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/23/ibms-new-servers-for-cloud-computing/#comment-880523</link>
		<dc:creator>HP Weds Cloud and High-performance Computing - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 11:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=12249#comment-880523</guid>
		<description>[...] don&#8217;t know how important it is to build out scalable computing efforts with IBM&#8217;s iDataPlex or HP&#8217;s offerings rather than an array of commodity x86 boxes, but the merging of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] don&#8217;t know how important it is to build out scalable computing efforts with IBM&#8217;s iDataPlex or HP&#8217;s offerings rather than an array of commodity x86 boxes, but the merging of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The &#8220;cloud&#8221; in the spotlight : business&#124;bytes&#124;genes&#124;molecules</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/23/ibms-new-servers-for-cloud-computing/#comment-872694</link>
		<dc:creator>The &#8220;cloud&#8221; in the spotlight : business&#124;bytes&#124;genes&#124;molecules</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 21:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=12249#comment-872694</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Ray Ozzie about Live Mesh Bungee Labs evolves to compete with Salesforce, Oracle, &#38; others IBM&#8217;s new servers for cloud computing Data center [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ray Ozzie about Live Mesh Bungee Labs evolves to compete with Salesforce, Oracle, &#38; others IBM&#8217;s new servers for cloud computing Data center [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nortel Spinoff Blade Network Technologies Aims To Virtualize Datacenter Racks &#124; Virtualization.com</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/23/ibms-new-servers-for-cloud-computing/#comment-872684</link>
		<dc:creator>Nortel Spinoff Blade Network Technologies Aims To Virtualize Datacenter Racks &#124; Virtualization.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 21:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=12249#comment-872684</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] innovations in cooling and efficiency to address Web 2.0-style computing (see iDataPlex coverage on GigaOM and Ars [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] innovations in cooling and efficiency to address Web 2.0-style computing (see iDataPlex coverage on GigaOM and Ars [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken O</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/23/ibms-new-servers-for-cloud-computing/#comment-872666</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=12249#comment-872666</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This signals a desperate attempt by IBM to create "specialized" hardware for cloud computing. The amusing contradiction is that a value proposition of cloud computing is to completely commoditize hardware. What firms should be focusing on is how to use &lt;em&gt;existing&lt;/em&gt; commodity hardware (mutli-vendor, at that) to create their own "cloud" environments.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This signals a desperate attempt by IBM to create &#8220;specialized&#8221; hardware for cloud computing. The amusing contradiction is that a value proposition of cloud computing is to completely commoditize hardware. What firms should be focusing on is how to use <em>existing</em> commodity hardware (mutli-vendor, at that) to create their own &#8220;cloud&#8221; environments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Wilensky</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/23/ibms-new-servers-for-cloud-computing/#comment-872642</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Wilensky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 14:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=12249#comment-872642</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Getting rid of the Power Supply per Box is one step - although blades do this, its not a strategy made in heaven for commercial data centers. Centralized DC power distribution can eliminate up to 30% of the Hysteresis losses in a large server farm. A badly designed DC distribution layout can be a major drag on power, reliability and safety.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I've been out the bi Iron business for a few years now; does anyone out there know if the current server offerings can have centralized DC? I know that Dell, HP, Sun probably so not, even very large configurations. I know that IBM's iron system (main frames) this is a default.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Getting rid of the Power Supply per Box is one step - although blades do this, its not a strategy made in heaven for commercial data centers. Centralized DC power distribution can eliminate up to 30% of the Hysteresis losses in a large server farm. A badly designed DC distribution layout can be a major drag on power, reliability and safety.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been out the bi Iron business for a few years now; does anyone out there know if the current server offerings can have centralized DC? I know that Dell, HP, Sun probably so not, even very large configurations. I know that IBM&#8217;s iron system (main frames) this is a default.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
