<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 60 GHz Chipmaker Phiar Fizzles &#038; Shuts Down</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/04/16/phiar-shuts-down/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/16/phiar-shuts-down/</link>
	<description>The Business of Technology</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 10:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Exclusive: IBM to Partner With Chip Startups to Cut Costs - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/16/phiar-shuts-down/#comment-907116</link>
		<dc:creator>Exclusive: IBM to Partner With Chip Startups to Cut Costs - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=12174#comment-907116</guid>
		<description>[...] and $55 million after that recap, was acquired out of bakruptcy by Intel for just $8 million. Those kinds of losses aren&#8217;t uncommon, and can deter [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and $55 million after that recap, was acquired out of bakruptcy by Intel for just $8 million. Those kinds of losses aren&#8217;t uncommon, and can deter [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phiar, a first alternative to the semiconductor industry &#187; VentureBeat</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/16/phiar-shuts-down/#comment-885133</link>
		<dc:creator>Phiar, a first alternative to the semiconductor industry &#187; VentureBeat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 18:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=12174#comment-885133</guid>
		<description>[...] Update: Phiar has shut its doors, according to GigaOm. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Update: Phiar has shut its doors, according to GigaOm. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forget GHz and Think THz for Wireless Chips - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/16/phiar-shuts-down/#comment-872728</link>
		<dc:creator>Forget GHz and Think THz for Wireless Chips - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 23:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=12174#comment-872728</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] when using 60 GHz. Reading about this effort, however, left me with a feeling of déjà vu, as recently defunct chip company Phiar was able to achieve speeds of up to 3 THz using its metal-on insulater technology and quantum [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] when using 60 GHz. Reading about this effort, however, left me with a feeling of déjà vu, as recently defunct chip company Phiar was able to achieve speeds of up to 3 THz using its metal-on insulater technology and quantum [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacey Higginbotham</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/16/phiar-shuts-down/#comment-871593</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacey Higginbotham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 20:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=12174#comment-871593</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Chris, Thanks, and I too wish they could have kept plugging along. I guess not all revolutions succeed.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chris, Thanks, and I too wish they could have kept plugging along. I guess not all revolutions succeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Morrison</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/16/phiar-shuts-down/#comment-871582</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Morrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=12174#comment-871582</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Very nice catch, Stacey -- I'm also really sorry to see this company go. The technology was a gamble, but it would have been great to see it take off.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice catch, Stacey &#8212; I&#8217;m also really sorry to see this company go. The technology was a gamble, but it would have been great to see it take off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
