<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 60 GHz Chipmaker Phiar Fizzles &amp; Shuts Down</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/04/16/phiar-shuts-down/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/16/phiar-shuts-down/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:05:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jon Leitner</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/16/phiar-shuts-down/#comment-929058</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Leitner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 23:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=12174#comment-929058</guid>
		<description>One of the problems with Phiar was that their technology is good for discrete devices, but with monolithic MMIC/RFIC designs now standard for 60 GHz (IBM, VubIQ, SiBeam...), there is an issue to incorporate their M-I-M technology on the chip with the other circuitry. Just look at the excellent performance with SiGe and even now CMOS. Their qtm tunneling with M-I-M technology should still be applicable and good for niche military, space, radio astronomy applications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the problems with Phiar was that their technology is good for discrete devices, but with monolithic MMIC/RFIC designs now standard for 60 GHz (IBM, VubIQ, SiBeam&#8230;), there is an issue to incorporate their M-I-M technology on the chip with the other circuitry. Just look at the excellent performance with SiGe and even now CMOS. Their qtm tunneling with M-I-M technology should still be applicable and good for niche military, space, radio astronomy applications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brave New Chip For a Brave New Wireless Future</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/16/phiar-shuts-down/#comment-925513</link>
		<dc:creator>Brave New Chip For a Brave New Wireless Future</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 18:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=12174#comment-925513</guid>
		<description>[...] aimed at televisions and AV equipment. Phiar, another company attempting to build a 60 GHz chip, shut down last year.    [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] aimed at televisions and AV equipment. Phiar, another company attempting to build a 60 GHz chip, shut down last year.    [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Exclusive: IBM to Partner With Chip Startups to Cut Costs - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/16/phiar-shuts-down/#comment-907116</link>
		<dc:creator>Exclusive: IBM to Partner With Chip Startups to Cut Costs - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=12174#comment-907116</guid>
		<description>[...] and $55 million after that recap, was acquired out of bakruptcy by Intel for just $8 million. Those kinds of losses aren&#8217;t uncommon, and can deter [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and $55 million after that recap, was acquired out of bakruptcy by Intel for just $8 million. Those kinds of losses aren&#8217;t uncommon, and can deter [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phiar, a first alternative to the semiconductor industry &#187; VentureBeat</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/16/phiar-shuts-down/#comment-885133</link>
		<dc:creator>Phiar, a first alternative to the semiconductor industry &#187; VentureBeat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 18:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=12174#comment-885133</guid>
		<description>[...] Update: Phiar has shut its doors, according to GigaOm. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Update: Phiar has shut its doors, according to GigaOm. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forget GHz and Think THz for Wireless Chips - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/16/phiar-shuts-down/#comment-872728</link>
		<dc:creator>Forget GHz and Think THz for Wireless Chips - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 23:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=12174#comment-872728</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] when using 60 GHz. Reading about this effort, however, left me with a feeling of déjà vu, as recently defunct chip company Phiar was able to achieve speeds of up to 3 THz using its metal-on insulater technology and quantum [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] when using 60 GHz. Reading about this effort, however, left me with a feeling of déjà vu, as recently defunct chip company Phiar was able to achieve speeds of up to 3 THz using its metal-on insulater technology and quantum [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacey Higginbotham</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/16/phiar-shuts-down/#comment-871593</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacey Higginbotham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 20:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=12174#comment-871593</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Chris, Thanks, and I too wish they could have kept plugging along. I guess not all revolutions succeed.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chris, Thanks, and I too wish they could have kept plugging along. I guess not all revolutions succeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Morrison</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/16/phiar-shuts-down/#comment-871582</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Morrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=12174#comment-871582</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Very nice catch, Stacey -- I&#039;m also really sorry to see this company go. The technology was a gamble, but it would have been great to see it take off.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice catch, Stacey &#8212; I&#8217;m also really sorry to see this company go. The technology was a gamble, but it would have been great to see it take off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
