Off Topic: Blockbuster Bids for Circuit City

So, Blockbuster’s genius CEO, Jim Keyes, wants to combine his struggling retail giant with Circuit City. WHY? It’s the kind of deal you can only justify if you’re coming off a major spring break bender. Otherwise, I don’t see how two blocks of lead can float. Why? First, Netflix and Amazon are, respectively, eating each company’s lunch. Second, a successful retail experience is now either big box (Wal-Mart) or deluxe (Apple).

Comments (9)

Rating: 60% Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
Print

1 trackback so far

April 17th, 2008
5:37 PM PT

8 comments so far

April 14th, 2008
9:59 AM PT
Gee said:

Maybe the grand idea is to obliterate CC as we know it, and transform the existing Blockbuster retail locations into GET YOUR MEDIA AND YOUR MEDIA PLAYER TOO shops…

April 14th, 2008
10:09 AM PT
Om Malik said:

@ Gee,

And what are the odds that this would actually work. Paidcontent puts it best when it poses the question: haven’t we seen this movie before. The CC+Napster deal didn’t exactly set the world on fire.

April 14th, 2008
10:13 AM PT
Salim Ismail said:

Om, I’d say there are two possible reasons:

1 - Buying CC might get him retail outlets on the cheap which could be converted to Blockbusters or have video rental embedded inside the stores. Blockbuster superstores that offer much more than video rentals might provide excellent shopper metrics (time in store, $$ per purchase, etc)

2 - The product lines in CC are complementary to BB and it could simply be a value play. (Which, to your point, could also be a distraction)

April 14th, 2008
10:31 AM PT
Om Malik said:

Good point Salim, but the big issue, is how to maximize return per squarefoot. I think video rentals are clearly not the way to go. As netflix has shown, physical space can kill the margins. I think taking BBuster and rolling into CC sores and shutting down BB stores might make a lot of sense. But that’s about it. I think such big box stores and the mergers never really work out properly.

April 14th, 2008
10:50 AM PT
Salim Ismail said:

Very true. I’m amazed they took so long to get online and have essentially lost that race to NetFlix. It’s one of those “stitching two corpses together doesn’t make one live person”.

April 14th, 2008
10:58 AM PT

I doesn’t really make sense just about anyway you look at it, however CNBC is reporting that Carl Ichan has agreed to bankroll -at least part- of the acquisition price.

…and we know that Mr. Ichan is usually a good poker player…

April 14th, 2008
12:33 PM PT
Om Malik said:

@ Nitin

I missed that bit about Icahn. Did he say why he was willing to bankroll the deal? Agreed he is a good poker player, but are the stakes big enough to play in this case?

April 14th, 2008
1:44 PM PT

Om,

I didn’t get the Icahn angle myself, since the whole thing just looks like a deadly embrace to me.

Anyway, here’s the link:

(link)

Leave a Comment

Get the comments RSS feed, instant notification of new comments

Most Comments

Is There Money in Voice APIs?
Dameon Welch-Abernathy, July 15, 39 comments
What Getting Buzzed Says About Yahoo
Om Malik, July 16, 30 comments
GigaOM Network Content to be Featured on BusinessWeek.com
Om Malik, July 14, 28 comments
New iPhone Will Jumpstart Demand for Wireless Broadband
Om Malik, July 13, 26 comments
Why Silicon Valley Should Be Worried
Om Malik, July 17, 26 comments
Close
E-mail It