<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 4G Wireless &#038; the Ensuing Bandwidth Boom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/04/11/4g-wireless-the-ensuing-bandwidth-boom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/11/4g-wireless-the-ensuing-bandwidth-boom/</link>
	<description>The Business of Technology</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 10:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Is 3G Ready For The iPhone Stress Test? - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/11/4g-wireless-the-ensuing-bandwidth-boom/#comment-882818</link>
		<dc:creator>Is 3G Ready For The iPhone Stress Test? - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 12:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=12122#comment-882818</guid>
		<description>[...] of between 10-to-15 megabits per second, that is enough for the very short term, but it can become a big issue as more and more 3G iPhones and other new 3G phones go online. Bandwidth at the backend is going to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of between 10-to-15 megabits per second, that is enough for the very short term, but it can become a big issue as more and more 3G iPhones and other new 3G phones go online. Bandwidth at the backend is going to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: This August, Get Up &#38; Mobilize - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/11/4g-wireless-the-ensuing-bandwidth-boom/#comment-879866</link>
		<dc:creator>This August, Get Up &#38; Mobilize - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 22:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=12122#comment-879866</guid>
		<description>[...] technologies. But just like the world of wireless, that is all set to change, as many wireless industry insiders believe that 4G Wireless (also known as LTE or WiMAX) might arrive faster than [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] technologies. But just like the world of wireless, that is all set to change, as many wireless industry insiders believe that 4G Wireless (also known as LTE or WiMAX) might arrive faster than [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: When It Comes to Broadband, There&#8217;s Never Enough - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/11/4g-wireless-the-ensuing-bandwidth-boom/#comment-878175</link>
		<dc:creator>When It Comes to Broadband, There&#8217;s Never Enough - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 17:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=12122#comment-878175</guid>
		<description>[...] Higginbotham, Tuesday, May 13, 2008 at 10:39 AM PT Comments (0)    Anyone questioning the need for more fiber or wireless backhaul, or even 4G wireless broadband, need only look at a recent survey from IDC that finds that a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Higginbotham, Tuesday, May 13, 2008 at 10:39 AM PT Comments (0)    Anyone questioning the need for more fiber or wireless backhaul, or even 4G wireless broadband, need only look at a recent survey from IDC that finds that a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mobile Back Haul Equals Big Money Opportunity - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/11/4g-wireless-the-ensuing-bandwidth-boom/#comment-878081</link>
		<dc:creator>Mobile Back Haul Equals Big Money Opportunity - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 05:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=12122#comment-878081</guid>
		<description>[...] are all building IP/Ethernet based backhaul networks. If you want to know more, please check out our conversation with Nortel CTO John Roese about 4G &#38; Wireless backhaul [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are all building IP/Ethernet based backhaul networks. If you want to know more, please check out our conversation with Nortel CTO John Roese about 4G &#38; Wireless backhaul [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sprint&#8217;s Xohm and Backhaul Bottleneck - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/11/4g-wireless-the-ensuing-bandwidth-boom/#comment-876523</link>
		<dc:creator>Sprint&#8217;s Xohm and Backhaul Bottleneck - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 14:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=12122#comment-876523</guid>
		<description>[...] after having a conversation with John Roese, chief technology officer of Nortel, about 4G Wireless, I came away with the conclusion that as 4G wireless broadband spreads, the biggest bottleneck &#8212; and thus [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] after having a conversation with John Roese, chief technology officer of Nortel, about 4G Wireless, I came away with the conclusion that as 4G wireless broadband spreads, the biggest bottleneck &#8212; and thus [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NextWave Plays Flip That Spectrum - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/11/4g-wireless-the-ensuing-bandwidth-boom/#comment-872902</link>
		<dc:creator>NextWave Plays Flip That Spectrum - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 22:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=12122#comment-872902</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] are the keys to making sure the next generation of wireless services measures up to the hype, as many of our readers have pointed out &#8212; and Sprint has learned with its Xohm WiMAX [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are the keys to making sure the next generation of wireless services measures up to the hype, as many of our readers have pointed out &#8212; and Sprint has learned with its Xohm WiMAX [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Roese&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Public and Private Networks: One or Both in the Future?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/11/4g-wireless-the-ensuing-bandwidth-boom/#comment-872533</link>
		<dc:creator>John Roese&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Public and Private Networks: One or Both in the Future?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 20:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=12122#comment-872533</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] all found the guest blog from Andy Lippman interesting and had a chance to see some of the recent dialog I have had with other bloggers, such as Om Malik (GigaOM). One of the challenges of blogging when you have a [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] all found the guest blog from Andy Lippman interesting and had a chance to see some of the recent dialog I have had with other bloggers, such as Om Malik (GigaOM). One of the challenges of blogging when you have a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dimitrios Matsoulis</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/11/4g-wireless-the-ensuing-bandwidth-boom/#comment-872205</link>
		<dc:creator>Dimitrios Matsoulis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=12122#comment-872205</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;At the end of the day fiber is the answer to so many network problems. 4G and its needs is yet another confirmation of that fact...
http://electronrun.com/&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the end of the day fiber is the answer to so many network problems. 4G and its needs is yet another confirmation of that fact&#8230;<br />
 (<a href="http://electronrun.com/" rel="nofollow">link</a>) </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DailyWireless &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Friday Links: PS3 Laptop, 4G, Gmail on Blackberry</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/11/4g-wireless-the-ensuing-bandwidth-boom/#comment-870998</link>
		<dc:creator>DailyWireless &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Friday Links: PS3 Laptop, 4G, Gmail on Blackberry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 11:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=12122#comment-870998</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] has a post up on 4G wireless and a broadband boom . . . click here to check it [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has a post up on 4G wireless and a broadband boom . . . click here to check it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/11/4g-wireless-the-ensuing-bandwidth-boom/#comment-870827</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 00:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=12122#comment-870827</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;While Verizon and AT&#38;T may well rely in part on their own fiber networks in certain parts of the US, there are clearly many, many areas where the only fiber close to the cell site belongs to a cable operator.  Expect A&#38;TT and Verizon (and of course Sprint and T-Mo, who won't feel the competitive queasiness) to strike deals with the MSOs for backhaul.  They won't want to do it, but they'll do it just the same.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Verizon and AT&amp;T may well rely in part on their own fiber networks in certain parts of the US, there are clearly many, many areas where the only fiber close to the cell site belongs to a cable operator.  Expect A&amp;TT and Verizon (and of course Sprint and T-Mo, who won&#8217;t feel the competitive queasiness) to strike deals with the MSOs for backhaul.  They won&#8217;t want to do it, but they&#8217;ll do it just the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rafa</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/11/4g-wireless-the-ensuing-bandwidth-boom/#comment-870813</link>
		<dc:creator>rafa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 23:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=12122#comment-870813</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;hola gigaom&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hola gigaom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: don juan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/11/4g-wireless-the-ensuing-bandwidth-boom/#comment-870796</link>
		<dc:creator>don juan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 21:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=12122#comment-870796</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;yes, nortel is known for its genius
especially in accounting
you need a criminal record to be considered for employment&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, nortel is known for its genius<br />
especially in accounting<br />
you need a criminal record to be considered for employment</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor Blake</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/11/4g-wireless-the-ensuing-bandwidth-boom/#comment-870774</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 17:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=12122#comment-870774</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;With 1Gbps today and 10Gbps in the future, EPON is the perfect fit for cell backhaul requiring GigE. It's a much lower cost technolgy than SONET or dedicated Ethernet (for the operators running the backhaul). It will provide the best bandwidth/cost for cell operators. Some operators that have their own wireline networks (such as Verizon) are already using PON (in their case GPON)) for cell backhaul. Redundancy in these networks is provided by a cominbation of multi-tier wireless backhaul and overlapping coverage from adjacent cells (the same way as it is done today).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Of course Nortel isn't in the PON access business so it wouldn't occur to them. But it makes perfect sense to run the towers on the SAME access network with other commercial and residential customers in the same geographies.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With 1Gbps today and 10Gbps in the future, EPON is the perfect fit for cell backhaul requiring GigE. It&#8217;s a much lower cost technolgy than SONET or dedicated Ethernet (for the operators running the backhaul). It will provide the best bandwidth/cost for cell operators. Some operators that have their own wireline networks (such as Verizon) are already using PON (in their case GPON)) for cell backhaul. Redundancy in these networks is provided by a cominbation of multi-tier wireless backhaul and overlapping coverage from adjacent cells (the same way as it is done today).</p>
<p>Of course Nortel isn&#8217;t in the PON access business so it wouldn&#8217;t occur to them. But it makes perfect sense to run the towers on the SAME access network with other commercial and residential customers in the same geographies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
