<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AT&#038;T&#8217;s 700 MHz Strategy: LTE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/04/03/open-access-restrictions-may-have-undervalued-spectrum/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/03/open-access-restrictions-may-have-undervalued-spectrum/</link>
	<description>Tracking the Internet Evolution</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 22:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Amitabh Kumar</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/03/open-access-restrictions-may-have-undervalued-spectrum/#comment-870243</link>
		<dc:creator>Amitabh Kumar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 05:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=12040#comment-870243</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Do US 700 MHz Spectrum Auctions Tilt the Scale in Favor of  LTE?
The results of the US spectrum auctions in the 700 Mhz band are out, as are the plans of some of the major players which have won the auctions.
Verizon and AT&#38;T have been the largest two successful bidders. AT&#38;T has already announced plans for using this spectrum for LTE. Verizon could also be looking at similar use. Echostar, the fourth largest bidder has also given signals that the spectrum may be used for Mobile TV extensions of the Dish Network.
Where does this leave WiMAX where the WiMAX forum had given signals to develop profiles in the 700 MHz band. In fact the WiMAX Congress Asia 2008 ( 9-10 April Singapore) is set to discuss the policies of 700 MHz use in its regulatory sessions.
It also raises questions on how the digital dividend will be treated in Europe and Asia? Will it also be used for LTE? Quite unlikely considering the state of broadcast networks and the need for future requirements. This leads to a risk that LTE technologies may also develop in incompatible bands globally. If AWS band used for mobile phone use is not enough, we have another case here.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do US 700 MHz Spectrum Auctions Tilt the Scale in Favor of  LTE?<br />
The results of the US spectrum auctions in the 700 Mhz band are out, as are the plans of some of the major players which have won the auctions.<br />
Verizon and AT&amp;T have been the largest two successful bidders. AT&amp;T has already announced plans for using this spectrum for LTE. Verizon could also be looking at similar use. Echostar, the fourth largest bidder has also given signals that the spectrum may be used for Mobile TV extensions of the Dish Network.<br />
Where does this leave WiMAX where the WiMAX forum had given signals to develop profiles in the 700 MHz band. In fact the WiMAX Congress Asia 2008 ( 9-10 April Singapore) is set to discuss the policies of 700 MHz use in its regulatory sessions.<br />
It also raises questions on how the digital dividend will be treated in Europe and Asia? Will it also be used for LTE? Quite unlikely considering the state of broadcast networks and the need for future requirements. This leads to a risk that LTE technologies may also develop in incompatible bands globally. If AWS band used for mobile phone use is not enough, we have another case here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DailyWireless &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Friday Links: LTE, Good Mobile Apps</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/03/open-access-restrictions-may-have-undervalued-spectrum/#comment-869472</link>
		<dc:creator>DailyWireless &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Friday Links: LTE, Good Mobile Apps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 11:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=12040#comment-869472</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Engadget has details for AT&#38;T&#8217;s plans for the B Block and Aloha Spectrum that they recently purchased. It will be used for LTE 4G. Read about it here. Gigaom also wonders if the open access restriction might have undervalued the spectrum. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Engadget has details for AT&amp;T&#8217;s plans for the B Block and Aloha Spectrum that they recently purchased. It will be used for LTE 4G. Read about it here. Gigaom also wonders if the open access restriction might have undervalued the spectrum. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Compaholic</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/03/open-access-restrictions-may-have-undervalued-spectrum/#comment-869451</link>
		<dc:creator>Compaholic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 05:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=12040#comment-869451</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Additionally, as I posted on my blog at http://blog.compaholics.com/2008/04/04/verizon-to-rollout-4g-network-by-2010-maybe/ Verizon said that LTE/4G might rollout in 2010 along with AT&#38;T in 2012.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Additionally, as I posted on my blog at <a href="http://blog.compaholics.com/2008/04/04/verizon-to-rollout-4g-network-by-2010-maybe/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.compaholics.com/2008/04/04/verizon-to-rollout-4g-network-by-2010-maybe/</a> Verizon said that LTE/4G might rollout in 2010 along with AT&amp;T in 2012.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vinnie mirchandani</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/03/open-access-restrictions-may-have-undervalued-spectrum/#comment-869435</link>
		<dc:creator>vinnie mirchandani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 02:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=12040#comment-869435</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Om, now that the participants can talk more openly, I think there was enough drama in the auction to warrant a movie like I wrote below&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://dealarchitect.typepad.com/deal_architect/2008/04/auction-73---th.html&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Om, now that the participants can talk more openly, I think there was enough drama in the auction to warrant a movie like I wrote below</p>
<p><a href="http://dealarchitect.typepad.com/deal_architect/2008/04/auction-73---th.html" rel="nofollow">http://dealarchitect.typepad.com/deal_architect/2008/04/auction-73&#8212;th.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/03/open-access-restrictions-may-have-undervalued-spectrum/#comment-869408</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 22:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=12040#comment-869408</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I have to think that 87% of America is a lot of CRAP.. 1000% hogwash. ATT has Hi Speed 24 miles north of me... 45 miles East of me, and has promised for the past 7 years, (When we can afford to) they allow some less than Hi Speed, charge $49.95 a month for 128 to 256 kbps average.
and They can not afford...10 years ago they layed FIBER OPTIC across the street. The local telephone repair people, can verify the telephone system locally here is just over 30 yrs old (that suks also)... when it sprinkles (rain) over 20% of town looses telephone for 1 to 3 days.. depends on amount. ATT suks and they know it...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to think that 87% of America is a lot of CRAP.. 1000% hogwash. ATT has Hi Speed 24 miles north of me&#8230; 45 miles East of me, and has promised for the past 7 years, (When we can afford to) they allow some less than Hi Speed, charge $49.95 a month for 128 to 256 kbps average.<br />
and They can not afford&#8230;10 years ago they layed FIBER OPTIC across the street. The local telephone repair people, can verify the telephone system locally here is just over 30 yrs old (that suks also)&#8230; when it sprinkles (rain) over 20% of town looses telephone for 1 to 3 days.. depends on amount. ATT suks and they know it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ProCookie Technology Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Gag on Wireless 700 Mhz- USA lifted</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/03/open-access-restrictions-may-have-undervalued-spectrum/#comment-869406</link>
		<dc:creator>ProCookie Technology Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Gag on Wireless 700 Mhz- USA lifted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 22:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=12040#comment-869406</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] now, AT&#38;T plans to deliver 3G services to 350 markets by the end of 2008. Om Malik has more on the AT&#38;T angle.  Verizon also talked up its broadband strategy and said the 700 Mhz auction win, which will cost the [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] now, AT&amp;T plans to deliver 3G services to 350 markets by the end of 2008. Om Malik has more on the AT&amp;T angle.  Verizon also talked up its broadband strategy and said the 700 Mhz auction win, which will cost the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jmurley</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/03/open-access-restrictions-may-have-undervalued-spectrum/#comment-869351</link>
		<dc:creator>jmurley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 17:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=12040#comment-869351</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;To bad AT&#38;T cant even get cellular coverage in a great deal of my state. This will work in 100 percent of cities, but I call bullshit on 87% of America covered. I am literally sitting here cracking up.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To bad AT&amp;T cant even get cellular coverage in a great deal of my state. This will work in 100 percent of cities, but I call bullshit on 87% of America covered. I am literally sitting here cracking up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Between the Lines mobile edition</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/03/open-access-restrictions-may-have-undervalued-spectrum/#comment-869338</link>
		<dc:creator>Between the Lines mobile edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 16:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=12040#comment-869338</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] now, AT&#38;T plans to deliver 3G services to 350 markets by the end of 2008. Om Malik has more on the AT&#38;T angle. Verizon also talked up its broadband strategy and said the 700 Mhz auction win, which will cost the [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] now, AT&amp;T plans to deliver 3G services to 350 markets by the end of 2008. Om Malik has more on the AT&amp;T angle. Verizon also talked up its broadband strategy and said the 700 Mhz auction win, which will cost the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steveballmer</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/03/open-access-restrictions-may-have-undervalued-spectrum/#comment-869314</link>
		<dc:creator>steveballmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 14:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=12040#comment-869314</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;ATT has got more up their sleeves than that! You don't know the exec's over there like I do, those guys are totally ruthless!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ATT has got more up their sleeves than that! You don&#8217;t know the exec&#8217;s over there like I do, those guys are totally ruthless!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ajay</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/03/open-access-restrictions-may-have-undervalued-spectrum/#comment-869286</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 10:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=12040#comment-869286</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;AT&#38;T has taken a better decision and judgement for the benifit of their customers.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AT&amp;T has taken a better decision and judgement for the benifit of their customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Petabro</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/03/open-access-restrictions-may-have-undervalued-spectrum/#comment-869275</link>
		<dc:creator>Petabro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 08:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=12040#comment-869275</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Om,
You should not fuel the HSPA hype on theoretical speeds - ~14 mbs shared in a sector - that b/w will be shared.
Anyhow, I have used HSDPA for 18 months - I am generally pleased. Makes me wonder WhyMax?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Om,<br />
You should not fuel the HSPA hype on theoretical speeds - ~14 mbs shared in a sector - that b/w will be shared.<br />
Anyhow, I have used HSDPA for 18 months - I am generally pleased. Makes me wonder WhyMax?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lozano Garrote Juan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/03/open-access-restrictions-may-have-undervalued-spectrum/#comment-869273</link>
		<dc:creator>Lozano Garrote Juan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 08:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=12040#comment-869273</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The most intriguing part of the auction is the fact that Qualcomm won licenses. I believe Qualcomm is hedging its bets. If for some reason it is not able to get a royalty payment for its patent portfolio do not be surprised if Qualcomm becomes a operator.
You must read this blog, because is the most popular website in spain:
http://articuloslibres.wordpress.com/&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most intriguing part of the auction is the fact that Qualcomm won licenses. I believe Qualcomm is hedging its bets. If for some reason it is not able to get a royalty payment for its patent portfolio do not be surprised if Qualcomm becomes a operator.<br />
You must read this blog, because is the most popular website in spain:<br />
<a href="http://articuloslibres.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">http://articuloslibres.wordpress.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/03/open-access-restrictions-may-have-undervalued-spectrum/#comment-869253</link>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 05:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=12040#comment-869253</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@ Shane&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Both me and Stacey are going to do a CTIA wrap up. Mine will be a slightly longer thought piece but stacey is going to do a reported wrap up. I am trying to get back to speed, but I haven't hit the stride just yet. Hang in there for a few weeks to get me back to normal. or almost normal.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Shane</p>
<p>Both me and Stacey are going to do a CTIA wrap up. Mine will be a slightly longer thought piece but stacey is going to do a reported wrap up. I am trying to get back to speed, but I haven&#8217;t hit the stride just yet. Hang in there for a few weeks to get me back to normal. or almost normal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/03/open-access-restrictions-may-have-undervalued-spectrum/#comment-869245</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 04:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=12040#comment-869245</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Om,
For the sake of your ardent fan-following, can you write a CTIA 2008 summary? We are interested in your take on products, new deals, announcements, rumors, speeches, discussions and the fun.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Looking forward to your CTIA notes,&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Om,<br />
For the sake of your ardent fan-following, can you write a CTIA 2008 summary? We are interested in your take on products, new deals, announcements, rumors, speeches, discussions and the fun.</p>
<p>Looking forward to your CTIA notes,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Petabro</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/03/open-access-restrictions-may-have-undervalued-spectrum/#comment-869229</link>
		<dc:creator>Petabro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 02:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=12040#comment-869229</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Om,
The most intriguing part of the auction is the fact that Qualcomm won licenses. I believe Qualcomm is hedging its bets. If for some reason it is not able to get a royalty payment for its patent portfolio do not be surprised if Qualcomm becomes a operator&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Om,<br />
The most intriguing part of the auction is the fact that Qualcomm won licenses. I believe Qualcomm is hedging its bets. If for some reason it is not able to get a royalty payment for its patent portfolio do not be surprised if Qualcomm becomes a operator</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
