<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Browser Wars, Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/04/01/browser-wars-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/01/browser-wars-again/</link>
	<description>The Business of Technology</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 10:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/01/browser-wars-again/#comment-900655</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 13:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11972#comment-900655</guid>
		<description>Alistair - Actually most SaaS project software achieve the same functionality. All without Flash. This &lt;a href="http://www.Clarizen.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Project Software&lt;/a&gt; for example. I wonder how these PM software will perform on Google Chrome, one of the reasons that I hesitate to use web based Project software is that the performance is NEVER good. There is always a delay on every action.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alistair - Actually most SaaS project software achieve the same functionality. All without Flash. This <a href="http://www.Clarizen.com/" rel="nofollow">Project Software</a> for example. I wonder how these PM software will perform on Google Chrome, one of the reasons that I hesitate to use web based Project software is that the performance is NEVER good. There is always a delay on every action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mozilla Not Worried About Google Browser - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/01/browser-wars-again/#comment-896980</link>
		<dc:creator>Mozilla Not Worried About Google Browser - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 23:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11972#comment-896980</guid>
		<description>[...] GigaOM Interview with John Lilly, CEO, Mozilla Corp. * Browser wars again. * John Lilly on The GigaOM [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] GigaOM Interview with John Lilly, CEO, Mozilla Corp. * Browser wars again. * John Lilly on The GigaOM [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skyfire Gets $13 Million To Fight Mobile Browser Wars - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/01/browser-wars-again/#comment-880512</link>
		<dc:creator>Skyfire Gets $13 Million To Fight Mobile Browser Wars - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 10:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11972#comment-880512</guid>
		<description>[...] Explorer and Apple&#8217;s Safari looking to one-up each other. While that certainly is true, the browser wars on the desktop are not as interesting as the sudden explosion of interest in the browsers on mobile [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Explorer and Apple&#8217;s Safari looking to one-up each other. While that certainly is true, the browser wars on the desktop are not as interesting as the sudden explosion of interest in the browsers on mobile [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Get ready to manage Silverlight, as MS takes the gloves off &#124; Bitcurrent</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/01/browser-wars-again/#comment-879358</link>
		<dc:creator>Get ready to manage Silverlight, as MS takes the gloves off &#124; Bitcurrent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 14:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11972#comment-879358</guid>
		<description>[...] Want to see a great example of monopolistic practices? It&#8217;s playing out in Browser Wars 2.0. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Want to see a great example of monopolistic practices? It&#8217;s playing out in Browser Wars 2.0. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GigaOM Interview: John Lilly, CEO of Mozilla Corp. - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/01/browser-wars-again/#comment-879167</link>
		<dc:creator>GigaOM Interview: John Lilly, CEO of Mozilla Corp. - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 12:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11972#comment-879167</guid>
		<description>[...] did, discussing everything from shortcomings of today&#8217;s browsers, Mozilla&#8217;s late entry into the world of mobiles, and the Firefox 3.0, which according to him will go final and be ready to download in June 2008. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] did, discussing everything from shortcomings of today&#8217;s browsers, Mozilla&#8217;s late entry into the world of mobiles, and the Firefox 3.0, which according to him will go final and be ready to download in June 2008. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alistair Croll</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/01/browser-wars-again/#comment-871976</link>
		<dc:creator>Alistair Croll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 00:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11972#comment-871976</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Charles: Wow, you guys did that without Flash? Color me impressed. That's a lot of functionality to squeeze into a browser.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Charles: Wow, you guys did that without Flash? Color me impressed. That&#8217;s a lot of functionality to squeeze into a browser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/01/browser-wars-again/#comment-871969</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 23:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11972#comment-871969</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Alistair - You can say that again! LiquidPlanner (which actually is pure browser, no Flash) pushes the limits of the browser hard. In our early testing with Firefox 3 we've seen really impressive gains in raw performance. With a project management application that does scheduling, it's really easy to produce some big complicated pages. The schedule view is a combination of task grids and schedule bars with even more things like "uncertainty" overlays and dependancy graphics layered on. Add to that all the Javascript for things like drag and drop and suddenly memory and object management is a big deal.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Alistair - You can say that again! LiquidPlanner (which actually is pure browser, no Flash) pushes the limits of the browser hard. In our early testing with Firefox 3 we&#8217;ve seen really impressive gains in raw performance. With a project management application that does scheduling, it&#8217;s really easy to produce some big complicated pages. The schedule view is a combination of task grids and schedule bars with even more things like &#8220;uncertainty&#8221; overlays and dependancy graphics layered on. Add to that all the Javascript for things like drag and drop and suddenly memory and object management is a big deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: O.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/01/browser-wars-again/#comment-868979</link>
		<dc:creator>O.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 20:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11972#comment-868979</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;From a Windows systems/network management perspective, it would be nice to see non-Microsoft browsers integrate with Group Policies in an Active Directory environment.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I believe that alternative browsers would be adopted much more quickly in some of the larger shops if they could provide the same integration and management features to administrators that MS broswers so, in this regard.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Just my 2c&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From a Windows systems/network management perspective, it would be nice to see non-Microsoft browsers integrate with Group Policies in an Active Directory environment.</p>
<p>I believe that alternative browsers would be adopted much more quickly in some of the larger shops if they could provide the same integration and management features to administrators that MS broswers so, in this regard.</p>
<p>Just my 2c</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El blog de Martín Arnedo &#187; Blog Archive &#187; La guerra de los navegadores v2.0</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/01/browser-wars-again/#comment-868919</link>
		<dc:creator>El blog de Martín Arnedo &#187; Blog Archive &#187; La guerra de los navegadores v2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 16:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11972#comment-868919</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] años despues del fin oficial de la guerra, parece que podría reabrirse de nuevo el frente, con actores y estrategias por supuesto diferentes. Por un lado, un Firefox heredero natural del [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] años despues del fin oficial de la guerra, parece que podría reabrirse de nuevo el frente, con actores y estrategias por supuesto diferentes. Por un lado, un Firefox heredero natural del [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vuelve la guerra de los navegadores &#171; nibarcomblog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/01/browser-wars-again/#comment-868910</link>
		<dc:creator>Vuelve la guerra de los navegadores &#171; nibarcomblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 14:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11972#comment-868910</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] años despues del fin oficial de la guerra, parece que podría reabrirse de nuevo el frente, con actores y estrategias por supuesto diferentes. Por un lado, un Firefox heredero natural del [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] años despues del fin oficial de la guerra, parece que podría reabrirse de nuevo el frente, con actores y estrategias por supuesto diferentes. Por un lado, un Firefox heredero natural del [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vuelve la guerra de los navegadores &#187; El Blog de Enrique Dans</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/01/browser-wars-again/#comment-868889</link>
		<dc:creator>Vuelve la guerra de los navegadores &#187; El Blog de Enrique Dans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 11:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11972#comment-868889</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] años despues del fin oficial de la guerra, parece que podría reabrirse de nuevo el frente, con actores y estrategias por supuesto diferentes. Por un lado, un Firefox heredero natural del [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] años despues del fin oficial de la guerra, parece que podría reabrirse de nuevo el frente, con actores y estrategias por supuesto diferentes. Por un lado, un Firefox heredero natural del [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arjwdotcom</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/01/browser-wars-again/#comment-868804</link>
		<dc:creator>arjwdotcom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 01:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11972#comment-868804</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I agree that the wars that browsers are waging now are much harsher than those in the past. But its not just memory management; its making sure that the web remains usable. Meaning everything from semantics, to memory management, to just being transparent to the end user. The browser that does this best wins the better battle.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But if developers don't code things nicely, no amount of fudging by the browser will be able to make up for that.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the wars that browsers are waging now are much harsher than those in the past. But its not just memory management; its making sure that the web remains usable. Meaning everything from semantics, to memory management, to just being transparent to the end user. The browser that does this best wins the better battle.</p>
<p>But if developers don&#8217;t code things nicely, no amount of fudging by the browser will be able to make up for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lionheart</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/01/browser-wars-again/#comment-868699</link>
		<dc:creator>lionheart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 15:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11972#comment-868699</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Lilly is the Hillary Clinton of tech.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lilly is the Hillary Clinton of tech.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saptarshi</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/01/browser-wars-again/#comment-868681</link>
		<dc:creator>Saptarshi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11972#comment-868681</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;There is also browser war going on between javascript performance. I compared the browsers using Mozilla's newly released test called &lt;a href="http://www.dromaeo.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Dromaeo.&lt;/a&gt; You can compare the results of different &lt;a href="http://sunnytalkstech.blogspot.com/2008/03/webkit-winning-in-dromaeo-mozilla.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;browsers here.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is also browser war going on between javascript performance. I compared the browsers using Mozilla&#8217;s newly released test called <a href="http://www.dromaeo.com" rel="nofollow">Dromaeo.</a> You can compare the results of different <a href="http://sunnytalkstech.blogspot.com/2008/03/webkit-winning-in-dromaeo-mozilla.html" rel="nofollow">browsers here.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Marktl</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/04/01/browser-wars-again/#comment-868650</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Marktl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 08:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11972#comment-868650</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hopefully that fight around better implementing standards. Nobody wants another IE6 as the end result...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully that fight around better implementing standards. Nobody wants another IE6 as the end result&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
