Now Verizon Wants Cable TV Portability. No Really!

Om Malik, Wednesday, March 26, 2008 at 12:05 PM PT Comments (6)

With the clock ticking on FCC Chairman Kevin Martin’s tenure, his special friends in the phone business are asking him to give them the moon, the stars and the sun: In other words, a cable TV version of number portability.

Verizon today asked the Federal Communications Commission to require the cable industry to make it as easy for consumers to choose a new video provider as it already is for them to switch voice providers. The process to switch video providers is more cumbersome for consumers…Cable incumbents do not accept disconnect orders from the new provider; instead, they require the customer to contact them directly to cancel service after choosing a new video provider and to return equipment. (press release)

Verizon’s arguments and press release may seem consumer-friendly, but one has to take all of it with a barrel of salt. Now, as you well know, I am no fan of cable companies — who apparently want to watch what you are doing inside your living room — but it’s hard to believe Verizon.

Even despite all the legal and other hassles, the satellite guys have been competing with cable companies for video customers — and they didn’t need a sugar daddy (aka the FCC) to help them out. Verizon should learn to compete in the open market.

Must I remind you that Verizon is the same company that rips out copper cables in favor of its own fiber, thereby taking away your ability to switch your broadband or voice service to another provider? Verizon itself delayed the switching of “broadband” service when customers wanted to buy DSL from another company, thus driving many of them out of business. In fact, incumbent phone companies indulge in such delays even now.

I think both incumbents — the cable and phone operators — are waging a war of words, and none of them, including the newly “open” Verizon, have consumers’ best interests in mind.

The P2P arguments, open networks, and now video portability all seem to be part of a calculated image makeover for Verizon. But as my granddaddy used to say: Just because you paint stripes on a donkey, it doesn’t make it a zebra.

6 comments so far

March 26th, 2008
12:33 PM PT
brian said:

I think the Hypocrites Verizon need to change there Cellphone charge to get out of cellphone contracts before they start on cable issues. You can’t leave a verizon contract unless you are dead or pay like 175 dollars…

March 26th, 2008
12:54 PM PT
Justin Lorry said:

You did not mention that the CABLE monopolists are asking the FCC for similar help against Verizon when they capture a phone customer. In the phone market, a service provider can switch the service for a comsumer upon request. Try that same manuever with your cable service and COMCAST will make you call them first and try to stop the switch.

Video service portablity is an idea whose time has come!!!!!!!!!!!

March 26th, 2008
2:37 PM PT
Matt M. said:

Although the idea is great for video portability the whole phone number portability thing didn’t work out so well for me…

http://www.verizonfioshelp.com/verizon-fios-sucks/about/

March 26th, 2008
5:08 PM PT
John Thacker said:

So Om, you can’t find anything to actually criticize in the proposal, so you settle for not liking Verizon as a reason to be against it?

Verizon is a nasty monopolist when it comes to phone service– and the cable companies are the reverse on cable TV. Both plead for open access when trying to offer competition on the other guy’s home turf, and oppose it on their own.

None of that makes for a reason to oppose a policy. I can support a policy without worrying about my allies of convenience.

March 27th, 2008
12:00 AM PT

[...] Read the rest of this post Print all_things_di220:http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080327/om-3/ Sphere Comment Tagged: FCC, cable portability, GigaOm, Kevin Martin, Voices, Om Malik, Verizon | permalink [...]

March 27th, 2008
8:32 AM PT
Dan said:

I am on Verizon FIOS for my cable and, thus far, it has been a disaster. They seemed to have rushed into the cable TV business without getting all their ducks in a row first.

The worst part is they recently upgraded their menu system and the new menu is the buggiest and slowest thing I’ve ever seen. It’s great when a company that can provide fiber optic internet cannot create a menu system that shows the text descriptions of movies without having it pause for 10+ seconds frequently as you try to use it.

So, you’ll have to pardon me if I get a little chuckle out of them wanting to make it easier for people to switch to them.

Leave a Comment

Get the comments RSS feed, instant notification of new comments

Most Comments

The 5 Stages of a Consumer Web Startup
Stacey Higginbotham, May 9, 31 comments
HP-EDS: It’s About The Clouds, Baby!
Om Malik, May 13, 28 comments
Xobni: Our Path from ‘Wrong Product’ to Killer App
Gabor Cselle, May 11, 21 comments
Off Topic: Now This Is Good Stuff
Om Malik, May 11, 21 comments
Prying Open the Social Graph
Stacey Higginbotham, May 12, 20 comments

Highest Rated

HP-EDS: It’s About The Clouds, Baby!
Om Malik, May 13, 142%
Off Topic: Now This Is Good Stuff
Om Malik, May 11, 71%
Prying Open the Social Graph
Stacey Higginbotham, May 12, 68%
Plazes Builds an iPhone Plazer
Om Malik, May 13, 75%
GSP East ticket discount
Edit Staff, May 9, 64%
Close
E-mail It