6 Comments

Summary:

The web continues to quake with aftershocks of “Safari-gate”: the Apple Software Update that installs Safari 3.1 for Windows by default. I tend to side with the folks that claim this practice isn’t the most forthcoming, but there are numerous examples of other companies doing the […]

Mwsfdotmac_2The web continues to quake with aftershocks of “Safari-gate”: the Apple Software Update that installs Safari 3.1 for Windows by default. I tend to side with the folks that claim this practice isn’t the most forthcoming, but there are numerous examples of other companies doing the same thing for years. In the end, it’s up to each individual user to actually examine which check-boxes are activated and therefore, which applications are installed.Having said that, I started thinking about Safari 3.1 on PCs. Maybe I’ve been spending too much time writing about file synchronization applications lately, but it got me wondering if Apple is working on a “.Mac lite” service for Windows PCs. We’re getting to the point where assuming there are PCs and Mac co-existing in the same household isn’t that far-fetched.

The immediate benefit is to leverage the Sync functionality of .Mac. No, you wouldn’t want to sync your Dashboard widgets and your Leopard Dock settings, but there’s a good bit of information you might want in sync. How about Safari bookmarks? Contacts and calendars? Will we eventually see Address Book and Mail apps for PCs out of Cupertino?Then there’s the 10 GB iDisk that .Mac offers. That’s twice the storage capacity of Windows Live SkyDrive, although that Microsoft service is currently free of charge. SkyDrive can’t be mapped as a network drive however; the iDisk appears in the Mac Finder as if it were a mapped drive for intents and purposes from an end-user point of view. And if AOL can get their Xdrive mapped in Internet Explorer, I’m thinking Apple could replicate that feat.Online backup is also in the .Mac package. Show me a PC user that doesn’t want their data backed up and I’ll show you a PC user that is bound to lose data and then complain about it. [Sorry folks, you'll get no sympathy from me].Mac also has that nifty “Back to my Mac” feature allowing you to control your Mac from another Mac. It’s a nice implementation, but when you peel off the PR spin and the simple UI, you’re left with a Remote Desktop client. Guess what, Windows has that functionality built-in as an optionally installed component and I’ve used similar functionality in Linux on my Eee PC.Maybe I’m pipe-dreaming or maybe I’ve had one too many cups of coffee this morning. By and large, I could see this happen now that Apple is pushing Safari for Windows out there. I think the browser was just the beginning and Apple is poised to leverage “switcher” households and homes that have both PCs and Macs playing nicely. I realize how much .Mac integrates into the OS, but I think there’s a case to be made here. Especially when .Mac earns Apple $99 a year in revenue per user.

  1. This would be so cool because when I use my PC I miss my mac. Is this a rumor or just a speculation? Eitherway, thanks for the heads up! This is beceoming my favorite Apple site! I really appreciate the shift away from mobile computing onto what people care about.

  2. Kevin C. Tofel Tuesday, March 25, 2008

    TrishaTT: this is simply why I think we’ll see such a service. There’s no factual evidence that Apple is working on it, but I see a market for it. Pure speculation on my part although I think this *IS* related to mobile computing. ;)

  3. Do that many people really pony up the cash for .mac? I’d like to see their subscriber numbers.

    I’ve always thought it’s a bit overpriced.

  4. Bah…it’s just webdav. You can ALREADY connect to your iDisk from Windows machines. I did it when I had a trial on my old Powerbook. It’s just a webdav server. In fact, here’s the Apple Knowledge base on doing just that:

    http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=52384

    The only piece missing is syncing bookmarks and whatnot across it.

  5. Nate: I agree…. .Mac is WAYYYY over priced. I get more space for podcasting on Libsyn then you would on .Mac. Granted, Libsyn is typically ONLY podcasting, but I see nothing preventing you from photocasting with it.

  6. We are one of those “mixed” households. Two Macs, Three PC’s (not including a 4th work related laptop). .Mac for Windows would be a good thing and likely continue to help bring Windows users into the Apple fold.

    ..and yes the .Mac thing works fine with Windows today. I access it from work and on the road, hit the iDisk, photo gallery etc.

    They could definitely do some interesting integration with it in Windows using Safari.

Comments have been disabled for this post