6 Comments

Summary:

Vudu was the audience favorite at a panel I moderated last night for the MIT/Stanford Venture Lab. CEO Mark Jung shared some of his ideas for the set-top box company — which he said isn’t really a set-top box company. According to Jung, Vudu is willing […]

Vudu was the audience favorite at a panel I moderated last night for the MIT/Stanford Venture Lab. CEO Mark Jung shared some of his ideas for the set-top box company — which he said isn’t really a set-top box company. According to Jung, Vudu is willing to experiment with everything, save just two core things: the user interface and the ability to transmit high-quality video on the turn of a dime. He’s also unwavering in his belief that the future of content consumption will remain in the living room, on a big-screen TV.

Vudu is not the bastion of paid video some would assume; the company plans to experiment with ad-supported content as well, according to Jung. Not because its paid model isn’t starting to work: The service is notching an average of five transactions per month per user, he said. One particular customer spent $800 in a month on Vudu content! The company is also trying to eliminate the $295 it currently charges for its box by cutting deals to place them in hotels and elsewhere. And Jung said Vudu is also exploring deals to put its software into other companies’ hardware.

Vudu will also open its platform, allowing outside developers and filmmakers on board. Careful not to alienate the Hollywood moguls he’s trying to corral, however, Jung allowed that “in some cases the role of a studio is becoming undefined.”

But Vudu’s platform won’t be that open — the company will always manually moderate the content it transmits. Jung (who was formerly COO of News Corp.’s Fox Interactive Media) justified the decision by telling a very funny story about when he worked with MySpace and asked every research outfit he could find to reliably differentiate between a peach and a certain anatomical part. His conclusion: Science just isn’t good enough.

Jung’s far-flinging promises of flexibility might smack of desperation, but it’s a hard market Vudu’s trying to get a foothold in. Despite audience enthusiasm, none of the VCs on the panel was sure Vudu was a good investment.

Jung, along with other panelists, said he sees only marginal opportunities for live and interactive video. Across the board, panelists said they thought on-demand was the inevitable future.

Apologies for the imprecise notes — I was caught up moderating the panel. But it was pretty interesting to see the impact Jung’s demo had on the audience, many of whom, when I subsequently asked if they would buy a Vudu device, raised their hands. Too bad Jung didn’t have the credit-card processor available right then and there.

You’re subscribed! If you like, you can update your settings

Related research

Subscriber Content

Subscriber content comes from Gigaom Research, bridging the gap between breaking news and long-tail research. Visit any of our reports to learn more and subscribe.

You're subscribed! If you like, you can update your settings

  1. Another box to buy? No thanks. The PC and TV will eventually come together (isn’t someone working on this?). Then it’ll just be a mad race to become the dominant viewing platform (Joost? Veoh?).

  2. @rsstv HP already have a Media center TV.

    http://h71036.www7.hp.com/hho/cache/366142-0-0-225-121.html

    Other Consumer Electronics Companies are looking at TVs that have browsers and a internet connection expect to see them at next years CES .

    Then theres the game consoles that have browsers and internet services like the weather,news channel like the Wii and PS3 people don’t seem to mind buying those as an extra box .

  3. I was hoping to hear something about the effects on the panelist’s businesses from video search engines like Google/YouTube and the search specialists.

    Search can bing to audiences the millions and billions of user and professional media out there, maybe all of it, at different qualities of user experience. Also, the presenters could be in position to become channels for a range of user experiences from high-def/high-touch to iPod, with huge access potential.

    ‘TV’ and Video Search touch in several areas. Balance of user experience and access to content is key to the market. The Future of Content Creation directly affects multimedia access needs. So what is the next end-game for moving image (TV or video)? If the medium is the message, let the message fit the medium?

  4. @Matt_ – Looks like the HP SmartMedia TV has the ability to access content on your PC; but you can’t surf the web. What we need is a way to wirelessly display the PC on the TV – this will bring internet media into the living room. I think in a few years new PCs and TVs will have this ability built in.

  5. GerardoB, I’m increasingly convinced that video search isn’t that relevant. It’s all about browsing and recommendations. What do you use video search for?

  6. Rumor: Has Vudu raised more than $40M? » VentureBeat Tuesday, April 8, 2008

    [...] video on the turn of a dime,” and that Vudu will be trying out ad-supported content soon, according to NewTeeVee. Tags: co:Vudu SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: “Rumor: Has Vudu raised more than $40M?”, url: [...]

Comments have been disabled for this post