<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 700 MHz Nets Feds $19.59B</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/03/19/700-mhz-nets-feds-1959b/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/19/700-mhz-nets-feds-1959b/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:01:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The New FCC and a Small Reality Check &#8211; GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/19/700-mhz-nets-feds-1959b/#comment-196612</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The New FCC and a Small Reality Check &#8211; GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 02:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11874#comment-196612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] is a government resource that private companies will pay dearly for (the 700 MHz auction generated more than $19 billion), Congress may be loathe to give up that source of revenue. The staffer said he thinks getting more [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is a government resource that private companies will pay dearly for (the 700 MHz auction generated more than $19 billion), Congress may be loathe to give up that source of revenue. The staffer said he thinks getting more [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fox-TWC Fight Could Weaken Broadcasters&#8217; Hold on Spectrum &#8211; GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/19/700-mhz-nets-feds-1959b/#comment-196611</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fox-TWC Fight Could Weaken Broadcasters&#8217; Hold on Spectrum &#8211; GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 20:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11874#comment-196611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] all, the spectrum in the 700 MHz auction went for a total of $19.59 billion. Could the broadcast spectrum be as valuable as that? Naysayers point out this is unlikely given [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] all, the spectrum in the 700 MHz auction went for a total of $19.59 billion. Could the broadcast spectrum be as valuable as that? Naysayers point out this is unlikely given [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internet. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Verizon and AT&#38;T Score in 700Mhz Auction</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/19/700-mhz-nets-feds-1959b/#comment-196610</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Internet. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Verizon and AT&#38;T Score in 700Mhz Auction]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 20:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11874#comment-196610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] to the nation&#8217;s wireless infrastructure, the 700MHz auction came to a close this week after raising $19.59 billion. Much like a political election, the incumbents won, and talk of change will likely remain just [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to the nation&#8217;s wireless infrastructure, the 700MHz auction came to a close this week after raising $19.59 billion. Much like a political election, the incumbents won, and talk of change will likely remain just [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Verizon and AT&#38;T Score in 700Mhz Auction - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/19/700-mhz-nets-feds-1959b/#comment-196609</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Verizon and AT&#38;T Score in 700Mhz Auction - GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11874#comment-196609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] to the nation&#8217;s wireless infrastructure, the 700MHz auction came to a close this week after raising $19.59 billion. Much like a political election, the incumbents won, and talk of change will likely remain just [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to the nation&#8217;s wireless infrastructure, the 700MHz auction came to a close this week after raising $19.59 billion. Much like a political election, the incumbents won, and talk of change will likely remain just [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Verizon and AT&#38;T Score in 700Mhz Auction - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/19/700-mhz-nets-feds-1959b/#comment-210696</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Verizon and AT&#38;T Score in 700Mhz Auction - GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11874#comment-210696</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] to the nation&#8217;s wireless infrastructure, the 700MHz auction came to a close this week after raising $19.59 billion. Much like a political election, the incumbents won, and talk of change will likely remain just [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to the nation&#8217;s wireless infrastructure, the 700MHz auction came to a close this week after raising $19.59 billion. Much like a political election, the incumbents won, and talk of change will likely remain just [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Wireless Spectrum Auction Has Ended</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/19/700-mhz-nets-feds-1959b/#comment-196608</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Wireless Spectrum Auction Has Ended]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 18:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11874#comment-196608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] And simply to quote one of the folks who&#8217;ve reported it, Stacey Higginbotham at GigaOm; [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And simply to quote one of the folks who&#8217;ve reported it, Stacey Higginbotham at GigaOm; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

