<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Takes on OpenX</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/03/13/google-takes-on-openx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/13/google-takes-on-openx/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:23:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Tsieh</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/13/google-takes-on-openx/#comment-951345</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Tsieh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 19:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11798#comment-951345</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;OpenX and Google Ad Manager are both OK for large and bureaucratic organizations, such as newspapers.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For most individuals and small to medium sized businesses, either of these solutions is way too complex and labour-intensive to be practical. Not to mention the fact that you&#039;ll be locked out of Goolge Ad Manager if your AdSense account is disabled.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.uniqlicks.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;uniQlicks&lt;/a&gt; is much better. There is no learning curve, and it makes inserting and switching ads easy for those people who need that ease the most - bloggers, work-at-home site owners, etc.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OpenX and Google Ad Manager are both OK for large and bureaucratic organizations, such as newspapers.</p>

<p>For most individuals and small to medium sized businesses, either of these solutions is way too complex and labour-intensive to be practical. Not to mention the fact that you&#8217;ll be locked out of Goolge Ad Manager if your AdSense account is disabled.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.uniqlicks.com/" rel="nofollow">uniQlicks</a> is much better. There is no learning curve, and it makes inserting and switching ads easy for those people who need that ease the most &#8211; bloggers, work-at-home site owners, etc.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OpenX Aims to Hold Off Google, Takes $10.4M Third Round</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/13/google-takes-on-openx/#comment-946905</link>
		<dc:creator>OpenX Aims to Hold Off Google, Takes $10.4M Third Round</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 12:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11798#comment-946905</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Calif.-based startup a war chest with which it hopes to fend off competition from Google, which introduced a competing free ad server product last year. DAG Ventures of Palo Alto, Calif., led the [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Calif.-based startup a war chest with which it hopes to fend off competition from Google, which introduced a competing free ad server product last year. DAG Ventures of Palo Alto, Calif., led the [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OpenX - free open source ad server software solution &#124; MyTestBox.com :: web software reviews, news, tips and tricks</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/13/google-takes-on-openx/#comment-932145</link>
		<dc:creator>OpenX - free open source ad server software solution &#124; MyTestBox.com :: web software reviews, news, tips and tricks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11798#comment-932145</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] about OpenX - Google takes on OpenX (Gigaom) - Advertising the open source way with OpenAds (CNET) - Scott Switzer, CTO &amp; Founder [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] about OpenX &#8211; Google takes on OpenX (Gigaom) &#8211; Advertising the open source way with OpenAds (CNET) &#8211; Scott Switzer, CTO &amp; Founder [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: djniyi</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/13/google-takes-on-openx/#comment-892541</link>
		<dc:creator>djniyi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 16:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11798#comment-892541</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;OpenX has advantages over a hosted solution - namely an Open API, which allows for customization. I don’t see anyone that is serving ad volume at a rate where they have resources to run there own server, not wanting to do so&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Hi Andrew,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Good comment. However, I don&#039;t think &quot;control&quot; and &quot;hosted solution&quot; are mutually exclusive. After all, Salesforce.com provides control and hosting as a joint benefit.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Frankly, I think our company - Trafficspaces - is going to be better than OpenX and Google Ad Manager simply because we provide a hosted ad manager/server that also includes a branded, self-service interface for advertisers.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;These are the real benefits that publishers are screaming for. Don&#039;t you think?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;www.trafficspaces.com&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;OpenX has advantages over a hosted solution &#8211; namely an Open API, which allows for customization. I don’t see anyone that is serving ad volume at a rate where they have resources to run there own server, not wanting to do so&#8221;</p>

<p>Hi Andrew,</p>

<p>Good comment. However, I don&#8217;t think &#8220;control&#8221; and &#8220;hosted solution&#8221; are mutually exclusive. After all, Salesforce.com provides control and hosting as a joint benefit.</p>

<p>Frankly, I think our company &#8211; Trafficspaces &#8211; is going to be better than OpenX and Google Ad Manager simply because we provide a hosted ad manager/server that also includes a branded, self-service interface for advertisers.</p>

<p>These are the real benefits that publishers are screaming for. Don&#8217;t you think?</p>

<p><a href="http://www.trafficspaces.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.trafficspaces.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Betto</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/13/google-takes-on-openx/#comment-867588</link>
		<dc:creator>Betto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 13:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11798#comment-867588</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Il 4 aprile ad Ancona un seminario gratuito su OpenX. Interverranno dal Londra i responsabili di OpenX. Tutti i dettagli qui http://www.anso.it/openx/&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Il 4 aprile ad Ancona un seminario gratuito su OpenX. Interverranno dal Londra i responsabili di OpenX. Tutti i dettagli qui <a href="http://www.anso.it/openx/" rel="nofollow">http://www.anso.it/openx/</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc&#8217;s Voice &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Now I GOTTA blog - dammit - there are too many stupid things going on!</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/13/google-takes-on-openx/#comment-865732</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc&#8217;s Voice &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Now I GOTTA blog - dammit - there are too many stupid things going on!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11798#comment-865732</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] There&#8217;s a battle brewing around open source ad servers.  Coolio! [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There&#8217;s a battle brewing around open source ad servers.  Coolio! [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacey Higginbotham</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/13/google-takes-on-openx/#comment-865717</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacey Higginbotham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11798#comment-865717</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Adam and David, you are both right. And now that I realize it&#039;s not the standard, I will never ever use nonplussed in that way again. He&#039;s unperturbed by the announcement, which I&#039;ve now fixed. Thanks for keeping me comprehensible.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam and David, you are both right. And now that I realize it&#8217;s not the standard, I will never ever use nonplussed in that way again. He&#8217;s unperturbed by the announcement, which I&#8217;ve now fixed. Thanks for keeping me comprehensible.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/13/google-takes-on-openx/#comment-865682</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 10:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11798#comment-865682</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Stacey seems to be using a new North American definition of &quot;nonplussed&quot; meaning &#039;not disconcerted; unperturbed&#039;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/nonplussed?view=uk&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stacey seems to be using a new North American definition of &#8220;nonplussed&#8221; meaning &#8216;not disconcerted; unperturbed&#8217;.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/nonplussed?view=uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/nonplussed?view=uk</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/13/google-takes-on-openx/#comment-865647</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 01:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11798#comment-865647</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m confused. Bilefield is nonplussed -- which means surprised and confused; is that how you meant it? -- by his own argument?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m confused. Bilefield is nonplussed &#8212; which means surprised and confused; is that how you meant it? &#8212; by his own argument?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/13/google-takes-on-openx/#comment-865642</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 00:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11798#comment-865642</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;A great use of OpenX is to have an independent accounting of impressions and click throughs for Google and other ad networks.  With ad manager you&#039;ll use Google (ad manager) to verify that Google (adsense) matches Google (analytics).  You&#039;ll also be feeding Google all your info about any other ad networks you&#039;re using.  x = eggs==&gt;1 basket&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A great use of OpenX is to have an independent accounting of impressions and click throughs for Google and other ad networks.  With ad manager you&#8217;ll use Google (ad manager) to verify that Google (adsense) matches Google (analytics).  You&#8217;ll also be feeding Google all your info about any other ad networks you&#8217;re using.  x = eggs==&gt;1 basket</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/13/google-takes-on-openx/#comment-865619</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11798#comment-865619</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;OpenX has advantages over a hosted solution - namely an Open API, which allows for customization.  I don&#039;t see anyone that is serving ad volume at a rate where they have resources to run there own server, not wanting to do so.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OpenX has advantages over a hosted solution &#8211; namely an Open API, which allows for customization.  I don&#8217;t see anyone that is serving ad volume at a rate where they have resources to run there own server, not wanting to do so.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
