Google Takes on OpenX

Stacey Higginbotham, Thursday, March 13, 2008 at 1:30 PM PT Comments (7)

This morning, Google said it was launching a hosted ad server program for small- to medium-sized web publishers called Ad Manager. As it happens, I was on the phone with James Bilefield, CEO of open-source ad-serving company OpenX (formerly Openads). Bilefield gave the usual this-validates-our-market spiel heard from entrepreneurs whenever a large competitor enters his company’s space, but he was also eager to point out that Google’s version is hosted, whereas OpenX can be downloaded and run on a publisher’s own servers — keeping their revenue and ad information in-house.

Right now, OpenX serves about 30,000 mostly small- to medium-sized publishers with “billions of ads per day,” according to Bilefield. Google’s recent buy of DoubleClick gives it an ad server for the large sites, but Bilefield says that now that the deal has closed, OpenX is winning a few customers based on worries that Google, which is both a publisher and an ad server, might compete against some of DoubleClick’s clients. It’s a similar argument made in the OpenX blog today.

Bilefield is nonplussed by this argument announcement, noting that Ad Manager has been in trials for a year and is now opening up only in public beta (to be fair, that’s how Google does things). OpenX recently scored $15.5 million in a second round of funding, and announced its own hosted ad server. OpenX makes most of its money helping ad networks source publishers. If Google Ad Manager takes off in the smaller publisher markets that OpenX services, advertisers may turn to Google for that service, or see OpenX as second-tier.

Rating: 50% Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
Print

7 comments so far

March 13th, 2008
2:39 PM PT
Andrew said:

OpenX has advantages over a hosted solution - namely an Open API, which allows for customization. I don’t see anyone that is serving ad volume at a rate where they have resources to run there own server, not wanting to do so.

March 13th, 2008
5:46 PM PT
Andy said:

A great use of OpenX is to have an independent accounting of impressions and click throughs for Google and other ad networks. With ad manager you’ll use Google (ad manager) to verify that Google (adsense) matches Google (analytics). You’ll also be feeding Google all your info about any other ad networks you’re using. x = eggs==>1 basket

March 13th, 2008
6:07 PM PT
Adam said:

I’m confused. Bilefield is nonplussed — which means surprised and confused; is that how you meant it? — by his own argument?

March 14th, 2008
3:35 AM PT
David said:

Stacey seems to be using a new North American definition of “nonplussed” meaning ‘not disconcerted; unperturbed’.

http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/nonplussed?view=uk

March 14th, 2008
8:24 AM PT
Stacey Higginbotham said:

Adam and David, you are both right. And now that I realize it’s not the standard, I will never ever use nonplussed in that way again. He’s unperturbed by the announcement, which I’ve now fixed. Thanks for keeping me comprehensible.

March 14th, 2008
9:58 AM PT

[...] There’s a battle brewing around open source ad servers. Coolio! [...]

March 27th, 2008
6:17 AM PT
Betto said:

Il 4 aprile ad Ancona un seminario gratuito su OpenX. Interverranno dal Londra i responsabili di OpenX. Tutti i dettagli qui http://www.anso.it/openx/

Leave a Comment

Get the comments RSS feed, instant notification of new comments

Most Comments

10 Reasons Enterprises Aren’t Ready to Trust the Cloud
Stacey Higginbotham, July 1, 43 comments
Inside Microsoft’s Internet Infrastructure & Its Plans For The Future
Om Malik, June 30, 25 comments
Bandwidth Barons Want More Money for Fewer Bytes
Allan Leinwand, July 3, 18 comments
State of U.S. Broadband: Demand Hits Speed Bumps
Om Malik, July 2, 16 comments
10 of the Biggest Platform Development Mistakes
Marty Abbott and Michael Fisher, June 30, 14 comments
Close
E-mail It