<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Altair Tosses Its Chips Into the WiMax Ring</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/03/10/altair-tosses-its-chips-into-the-wimax-ring/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/10/altair-tosses-its-chips-into-the-wimax-ring/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:48:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Broadcom to Buy Beceem in a Bid for 4G Dominance: Tech News &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/10/altair-tosses-its-chips-into-the-wimax-ring/#comment-295910</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Broadcom to Buy Beceem in a Bid for 4G Dominance: Tech News &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11751#comment-295910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] investors and Broadcom. Perhaps this deal opens the door for other 4G radio startups such as Altair Semiconductor, Wavesat and Sequans to find [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] investors and Broadcom. Perhaps this deal opens the door for other 4G radio startups such as Altair Semiconductor, Wavesat and Sequans to find [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More Radios on Fewer Chips - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/10/altair-tosses-its-chips-into-the-wimax-ring/#comment-195669</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[More Radios on Fewer Chips - GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 13:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11751#comment-195669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] why chip vendors, from established players like Broadcom and NXP to startups like Wavesat and Altair, are hoping to put multiple radios onto one chip. And many of them are turning to software to do [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] why chip vendors, from established players like Broadcom and NXP to startups like Wavesat and Altair, are hoping to put multiple radios onto one chip. And many of them are turning to software to do [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Law of Mobility &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Enabling Technology: Week of 3/9/8</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/10/altair-tosses-its-chips-into-the-wimax-ring/#comment-195668</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Law of Mobility &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Enabling Technology: Week of 3/9/8]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11751#comment-195668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] 7mm WiMax chip [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 7mm WiMax chip [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DailyWireless &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Wednesday Links: Trixbox, MyLoki and WiMAX</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/10/altair-tosses-its-chips-into-the-wimax-ring/#comment-195667</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DailyWireless &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Wednesday Links: Trixbox, MyLoki and WiMAX]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 04:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11751#comment-195667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Altair has entered the WiMAX realm with a new WiMAX chip released. GIGaom reports here. [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Altair has entered the WiMAX realm with a new WiMAX chip released. GIGaom reports here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New WiMax Chip Emerges &#38; Is More Efficient Than IntelsGadget Review</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/10/altair-tosses-its-chips-into-the-wimax-ring/#comment-195666</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[New WiMax Chip Emerges &#38; Is More Efficient Than IntelsGadget Review]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 03:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11751#comment-195666</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] [Gigaom] [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [Gigaom] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New WiMax Chip Emerges &#38; Is More Efficient Than IntelsGadget Review</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/10/altair-tosses-its-chips-into-the-wimax-ring/#comment-210686</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[New WiMax Chip Emerges &#38; Is More Efficient Than IntelsGadget Review]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 03:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11751#comment-210686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] [Gigaom] [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [Gigaom] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob La Gesse</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/10/altair-tosses-its-chips-into-the-wimax-ring/#comment-195665</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob La Gesse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 00:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11751#comment-195665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;&quot;But Altair Semiconductor, which is now sampling chips, has some cool attributes worth nothing&quot;. I think you meant &quot;worth noting&quot;.  Normally I wouldn&#039;t point out a typo, but in this case, it does make a significant different in the article!&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But Altair Semiconductor, which is now sampling chips, has some cool attributes worth nothing&#8221;. I think you meant &#8220;worth noting&#8221;.  Normally I wouldn&#8217;t point out a typo, but in this case, it does make a significant different in the article!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

