<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Zuckerberg Isn&#8217;t About the Money</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/03/09/zuckerberg-isnt-about-the-money/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/09/zuckerberg-isnt-about-the-money/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:44:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Everyone Isn&#8217;t Great in Every Medium: The Sarah Lacy Story &#171; SmoothSpan Blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/09/zuckerberg-isnt-about-the-money/#comment-865319</link>
		<dc:creator>Everyone Isn&#8217;t Great in Every Medium: The Sarah Lacy Story &#171; SmoothSpan Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 21:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11744#comment-865319</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] any news.  He would not chat about anything that wasn&#8217;t already well-known and scripted.  When asked about a Facebook music service, for example, he replied, &#8220;“We have nothing to talk about right [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] any news.  He would not chat about anything that wasn&#8217;t already well-known and scripted.  When asked about a Facebook music service, for example, he replied, &#8220;“We have nothing to talk about right [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frmad</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/09/zuckerberg-isnt-about-the-money/#comment-865149</link>
		<dc:creator>frmad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 03:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11744#comment-865149</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Conglatulation! both of your blog, and this post are high ranked in &lt;a href=&quot;http://nghecon9.googlepages.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;
&quot;The top blogs of the day&quot; report&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conglatulation! both of your blog, and this post are high ranked in <a href="http://nghecon9.googlepages.com" rel="nofollow">
&#8220;The top blogs of the day&#8221; report</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mantic Media &#187; The Lacey Debacle Aside, What Did Zuck Actually Say?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/09/zuckerberg-isnt-about-the-money/#comment-865081</link>
		<dc:creator>Mantic Media &#187; The Lacey Debacle Aside, What Did Zuck Actually Say?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11744#comment-865081</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] GigaOm shrewdly points out, Zuck&#8217;s isn&#8217;t concerned with money or Facebook&#8217;s $15 billion valuation. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] GigaOm shrewdly points out, Zuck&#8217;s isn&#8217;t concerned with money or Facebook&#8217;s $15 billion valuation. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mp3</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/09/zuckerberg-isnt-about-the-money/#comment-865067</link>
		<dc:creator>mp3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11744#comment-865067</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Zuckerberg Isn’t About the Money????! Good?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zuckerberg Isn’t About the Money????! Good?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saving Face(book): When do you hire a pro CEO? &#171; FoundRead</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/09/zuckerberg-isnt-about-the-money/#comment-865055</link>
		<dc:creator>Saving Face(book): When do you hire a pro CEO? &#171; FoundRead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11744#comment-865055</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] I&#8217;m not so sure. Then yesterday I read GigaOM colleague Stacey Higginbotham&#8217;s column,  Zuckerberg Isn’t About the Money, published from SXSW&#8230;  where Zuckerberg was interviewed by Business Week&#8217;s Sarah [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;m not so sure. Then yesterday I read GigaOM colleague Stacey Higginbotham&#8217;s column,  Zuckerberg Isn’t About the Money, published from SXSW&#8230;  where Zuckerberg was interviewed by Business Week&#8217;s Sarah [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ShellyBlog &#187; The SXSW Keynote Debacle</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/09/zuckerberg-isnt-about-the-money/#comment-865051</link>
		<dc:creator>ShellyBlog &#187; The SXSW Keynote Debacle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11744#comment-865051</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] are plenty of accounts in blogs and on Twitter of what happened yesterday. Some, showing remarkable restraint, actually provide a straight report on what Zuckerberg said in answer to Lacy&#8217;s questions. I [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are plenty of accounts in blogs and on Twitter of what happened yesterday. Some, showing remarkable restraint, actually provide a straight report on what Zuckerberg said in answer to Lacy&#8217;s questions. I [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chet</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/09/zuckerberg-isnt-about-the-money/#comment-865019</link>
		<dc:creator>Chet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11744#comment-865019</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I tend to side with Alex on this one.  Monetization is something that&#039;s built on top of a solid user experience and a useful product that can build a following, not the other way around.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And I don&#039;t find it disturbing at all that Zuckerberg is more focused on vision than finances.  He&#039;s not trained in finances, and (correctly) leaves that segment of his business to the very capable people that he&#039;s hired to look after it for him.  Sometimes the mark of a good leader is the ability to hire people who are smarter than you, and leave them alone to do what they do well.  Vision about a product is what put Zuckerberg where he is today, not any sort of deep financial understanding.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;My feeling is (again, with Alex) that he should continue to make sure the ship is sailing the right direction, and let a well-paid and well-trained crew worry about the economics of getting everybody fed.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend to side with Alex on this one.  Monetization is something that&#8217;s built on top of a solid user experience and a useful product that can build a following, not the other way around.</p>

<p>And I don&#8217;t find it disturbing at all that Zuckerberg is more focused on vision than finances.  He&#8217;s not trained in finances, and (correctly) leaves that segment of his business to the very capable people that he&#8217;s hired to look after it for him.  Sometimes the mark of a good leader is the ability to hire people who are smarter than you, and leave them alone to do what they do well.  Vision about a product is what put Zuckerberg where he is today, not any sort of deep financial understanding.</p>

<p>My feeling is (again, with Alex) that he should continue to make sure the ship is sailing the right direction, and let a well-paid and well-trained crew worry about the economics of getting everybody fed.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prashant</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/09/zuckerberg-isnt-about-the-money/#comment-865004</link>
		<dc:creator>Prashant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11744#comment-865004</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@stacey: I think Scrabulous was making more than 25K per month . two person startup . not in the top 10 application still 25K + is a decent number i guess.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;give him a Break guys ..the Chap is just 23 year old .&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@stacey: I think Scrabulous was making more than 25K per month . two person startup . not in the top 10 application still 25K + is a decent number i guess.</p>

<p>give him a Break guys ..the Chap is just 23 year old .</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What Makes a Web Video Celeb? &#171; NewTeeVee</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/09/zuckerberg-isnt-about-the-money/#comment-864996</link>
		<dc:creator>What Makes a Web Video Celeb? &#171; NewTeeVee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 08:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11744#comment-864996</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] though I couldn&#8217;t be there in person, I&#8217;ve enjoyed reading the coverage of events (like Stacey&#8217;s take on Mark Zuckeberg&#8217;s keynote conversation). One discussion that I&#8217;m bummed I missed was the I&#8217;m Internet [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] though I couldn&#8217;t be there in person, I&#8217;ve enjoyed reading the coverage of events (like Stacey&#8217;s take on Mark Zuckeberg&#8217;s keynote conversation). One discussion that I&#8217;m bummed I missed was the I&#8217;m Internet [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kuldeep</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/09/zuckerberg-isnt-about-the-money/#comment-864994</link>
		<dc:creator>kuldeep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 07:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11744#comment-864994</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thank god!! At least somebody talked about actual keynote rather than gossip about it.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank god!! At least somebody talked about actual keynote rather than gossip about it.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil V</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/09/zuckerberg-isnt-about-the-money/#comment-864983</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 03:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11744#comment-864983</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Zuckerberg spun carefully constructed public relations messaging to just about every question throughout the course of this often repetitive interview. I walked in and out a few times, and the same message deck was in play. Still, most of the folks in the overflow room at SxsW were heavily engaged. Lets give him props for having managed to get FB where it is today.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zuckerberg spun carefully constructed public relations messaging to just about every question throughout the course of this often repetitive interview. I walked in and out a few times, and the same message deck was in play. Still, most of the folks in the overflow room at SxsW were heavily engaged. Lets give him props for having managed to get FB where it is today.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacey Higginbotham</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/09/zuckerberg-isnt-about-the-money/#comment-864976</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacey Higginbotham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 02:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11744#comment-864976</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Zac, yes the interview was fluffy. I didn&#039;t go into the rancor the audience had for Lacy because that&#039;s the story  everyone else would have, and potentially the story that FB wanted people to see. I probably should have mentioned it, but I didn&#039;t want to let the angst against Lacy distract people from realizing that Zuckerberg got up there and said very little.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;@Alex N., I&#039;ll try not to take that as a flame, but I would like to hear from some of these apps developers who are making money in the millions. No one I&#039;ve spoken with seems to be making much money from their applications through advertising so far, so perhaps these are people doing transactional fees? I would love to talk to them.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Zac, yes the interview was fluffy. I didn&#8217;t go into the rancor the audience had for Lacy because that&#8217;s the story  everyone else would have, and potentially the story that FB wanted people to see. I probably should have mentioned it, but I didn&#8217;t want to let the angst against Lacy distract people from realizing that Zuckerberg got up there and said very little.</p>

<p>@Alex N., I&#8217;ll try not to take that as a flame, but I would like to hear from some of these apps developers who are making money in the millions. No one I&#8217;ve spoken with seems to be making much money from their applications through advertising so far, so perhaps these are people doing transactional fees? I would love to talk to them.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex N</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/09/zuckerberg-isnt-about-the-money/#comment-864970</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 01:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11744#comment-864970</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ok, let me start by saying that what I am about to write is &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; a flame.  But, at the same time, after reading this post, I have to say I find it somewhat ridiculous.  Have you spoken to any kind of well informed spectrum of facebook application developers?  Perhaps you should.  Some of them will tell you that they&#039;ve left &lt;em&gt;very&lt;/em&gt; cushy jobs to work on their apps.  Apps in the top 100 are easily paying the developers&#039; former salaries and more [if they &quot;monetize&quot; correctly].  So, if applications running on Facebook platform can command profitability in the 150k+/year range (with the top 10 apps having profitability in the millions), what do you suppose facebook&#039;s figures look like?  If you think and extrapolate logically, facebook&#039;s page views per user are something to the effect of 50 per visit.  Applications amassing the aforementioned returns don&#039;t even top 25.  Now, please extrapolate the numbers.  Add value of a vastly growing and expanding user base.  Add engagement.  Extrapolate some more.  Then, rethink your statements about Zuck having to &lt;em&gt;think&lt;/em&gt; about &quot;monetization&quot; -- read paragraph 2 of page 4 of the article by a certain Mr. Anderson [of Wired, not TED]: http://www.wired.com/techbiz/it/magazine/16-03/ff_free?currentPage=4.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Instead, Zuck is doing for Facebook what every other startup should do - focus on value for the user, and give the users what they want first.  &quot;Monetization&quot; will resolve itself.  Besides, in the world of free, who wants to listen to blabbing about &quot;But if no one will pay for it, then how valuable can the Facebook platform be?&quot;  You are using his interview at SXSW as a source?  As a member of the &quot;press&quot;, please don&#039;t forget what a mess interviews can be, and stop being such a hypocrite.  Also, remember, that if Zuck &lt;em&gt;were&lt;/em&gt; to run out of money, I assure you, he won&#039;t have trouble finding more.  Facebook isn&#039;t leaving the party, and Zuck probably won&#039;t be asking you for a dance any time soon :p.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Again, this comment wasn&#039;t meant to be a flame.  But, the more I thought about the context of what I was saying, the more upset I felt about ridiculous comments thrown at Zuck&#039;s inability to &quot;monetize&quot; - and that&#039;s just pure b.s. - pardon my bluntness, but if I want &quot;ragù alla bolognese&quot;, I&#039;ll go to an Italian restaurant.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, let me start by saying that what I am about to write is <em>not</em> a flame.  But, at the same time, after reading this post, I have to say I find it somewhat ridiculous.  Have you spoken to any kind of well informed spectrum of facebook application developers?  Perhaps you should.  Some of them will tell you that they&#8217;ve left <em>very</em> cushy jobs to work on their apps.  Apps in the top 100 are easily paying the developers&#8217; former salaries and more [if they "monetize" correctly].  So, if applications running on Facebook platform can command profitability in the 150k+/year range (with the top 10 apps having profitability in the millions), what do you suppose facebook&#8217;s figures look like?  If you think and extrapolate logically, facebook&#8217;s page views per user are something to the effect of 50 per visit.  Applications amassing the aforementioned returns don&#8217;t even top 25.  Now, please extrapolate the numbers.  Add value of a vastly growing and expanding user base.  Add engagement.  Extrapolate some more.  Then, rethink your statements about Zuck having to <em>think</em> about &#8220;monetization&#8221; &#8212; read paragraph 2 of page 4 of the article by a certain Mr. Anderson [of Wired, not TED]: <a href="http://www.wired.com/techbiz/it/magazine/16-03/ff_free?currentPage=4" rel="nofollow">http://www.wired.com/techbiz/it/magazine/16-03/ff_free?currentPage=4</a>.</p>

<p>Instead, Zuck is doing for Facebook what every other startup should do &#8211; focus on value for the user, and give the users what they want first.  &#8220;Monetization&#8221; will resolve itself.  Besides, in the world of free, who wants to listen to blabbing about &#8220;But if no one will pay for it, then how valuable can the Facebook platform be?&#8221;  You are using his interview at SXSW as a source?  As a member of the &#8220;press&#8221;, please don&#8217;t forget what a mess interviews can be, and stop being such a hypocrite.  Also, remember, that if Zuck <em>were</em> to run out of money, I assure you, he won&#8217;t have trouble finding more.  Facebook isn&#8217;t leaving the party, and Zuck probably won&#8217;t be asking you for a dance any time soon :p.</p>

<p>Again, this comment wasn&#8217;t meant to be a flame.  But, the more I thought about the context of what I was saying, the more upset I felt about ridiculous comments thrown at Zuck&#8217;s inability to &#8220;monetize&#8221; &#8211; and that&#8217;s just pure b.s. &#8211; pardon my bluntness, but if I want &#8220;ragù alla bolognese&#8221;, I&#8217;ll go to an Italian restaurant.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Podnosh Blog : High Fibre Podcasting &#187; Archive &#187; Monday Mentions. March 10th 2008</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/09/zuckerberg-isnt-about-the-money/#comment-864969</link>
		<dc:creator>Podnosh Blog : High Fibre Podcasting &#187; Archive &#187; Monday Mentions. March 10th 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 01:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11744#comment-864969</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] $15 billion: Am I bothered? [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] $15 billion: Am I bothered? [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stone</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/09/zuckerberg-isnt-about-the-money/#comment-864967</link>
		<dc:creator>stone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 00:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11744#comment-864967</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Does anyone actually find his answer about his possible fortune in the slightest bit credible? Also, does anyone actually buy the line about Facebook running at &quot;bascially breakeven&quot;? My guess is they are going to lose a boatload of money this year after making money last year --- which means they&#039;re going backward.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone actually find his answer about his possible fortune in the slightest bit credible? Also, does anyone actually buy the line about Facebook running at &#8220;bascially breakeven&#8221;? My guess is they are going to lose a boatload of money this year after making money last year &#8212; which means they&#8217;re going backward.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curt</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/09/zuckerberg-isnt-about-the-money/#comment-864965</link>
		<dc:creator>Curt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 00:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11744#comment-864965</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If Mr. Zuckerberg really possessed &quot;starry-eyed idealism&quot; he would take one look at the allegedly $15 billion dollar foundation he stands on and do something idealistic, or even starry-eyed, such as standing up for his users; in particular Fouad Mourtada, who got sentenced to 3 years in a Moroccan jail for faking a Facebook profile of that country&#039;s crown prince. The sentence was censorious and wildly disproportionate to the &quot;crime.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Mr. Zuckerberg could be the first leader of an American Internet communications company in history to stand up and say: Enough is enough - we&#039;ve got plenty of cash &amp; we&#039;re going to take this moment to &lt;em&gt;stand&lt;/em&gt; for something. No, sorry. He&#039;s got about as much &quot;starry-eyed idealism&quot; as Bill Gates, Larry Ellison and Sergei Brin.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Mr. Zuckerberg really possessed &#8220;starry-eyed idealism&#8221; he would take one look at the allegedly $15 billion dollar foundation he stands on and do something idealistic, or even starry-eyed, such as standing up for his users; in particular Fouad Mourtada, who got sentenced to 3 years in a Moroccan jail for faking a Facebook profile of that country&#8217;s crown prince. The sentence was censorious and wildly disproportionate to the &#8220;crime.&#8221;</p>

<p>Mr. Zuckerberg could be the first leader of an American Internet communications company in history to stand up and say: Enough is enough &#8211; we&#8217;ve got plenty of cash &amp; we&#8217;re going to take this moment to <em>stand</em> for something. No, sorry. He&#8217;s got about as much &#8220;starry-eyed idealism&#8221; as Bill Gates, Larry Ellison and Sergei Brin.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
