<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does iPhone Need The iFund?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/03/06/does-iphone-need-the-ifund/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/06/does-iphone-need-the-ifund/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:29:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: VC Firm KPCB Looking To Hire a Digital Media Partner: Tech News &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/06/does-iphone-need-the-ifund/#comment-285524</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VC Firm KPCB Looking To Hire a Digital Media Partner: Tech News &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 23:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/03/06/does-iphone-need-the-ifund/#comment-285524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] and AOL in the past is looking to bring on board a technically savvy partner who will help bolster the iFund, a fund devoted to the Apple iPhone ecosystem. KPCB doubled the size of the iFund in 2010. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and AOL in the past is looking to bring on board a technically savvy partner who will help bolster the iFund, a fund devoted to the Apple iPhone ecosystem. KPCB doubled the size of the iFund in 2010. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Should Android be Startups&#8217; First Choice? &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/06/does-iphone-need-the-ifund/#comment-271147</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Should Android be Startups&#8217; First Choice? &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 21:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/03/06/does-iphone-need-the-ifund/#comment-271147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]    In the heady days of the iPhone&#8217;s advent, Kleiner Perkins announced a $100 million fund to focus on investing in its wake. Just two years later, Kleiner Perkins has [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]    In the heady days of the iPhone&#8217;s advent, Kleiner Perkins announced a $100 million fund to focus on investing in its wake. Just two years later, Kleiner Perkins has [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kleiner Perkins Commits $100M More to Its iFund</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/06/does-iphone-need-the-ifund/#comment-195427</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kleiner Perkins Commits $100M More to Its iFund]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 19:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/03/06/does-iphone-need-the-ifund/#comment-195427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] touch &#8212; as it&#8217;s already spent its allocated $100 million in the two years since the fund was first formed. The announcement comes on the eve of Apple&#8217;s iPad launch, the SDK for which, in light of [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] touch &#8212; as it&#8217;s already spent its allocated $100 million in the two years since the fund was first formed. The announcement comes on the eve of Apple&#8217;s iPad launch, the SDK for which, in light of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iPad Launch Spawns a Tablet AppFund &#8211; GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/06/does-iphone-need-the-ifund/#comment-195426</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[iPad Launch Spawns a Tablet AppFund &#8211; GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 18:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/03/06/does-iphone-need-the-ifund/#comment-195426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] iPad and other tablets. The New York City-based AppFund doesn&#8217;t have quite the resume of the Kleiner Perkins-backed and Apple-supported iFund, but it&#8217;s jumping in at a time when tablets are top of mind. The [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] iPad and other tablets. The New York City-based AppFund doesn&#8217;t have quite the resume of the Kleiner Perkins-backed and Apple-supported iFund, but it&#8217;s jumping in at a time when tablets are top of mind. The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Booyah: iPhone Game Startup Gets $4.5M in Funding</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/06/does-iphone-need-the-ifund/#comment-195425</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Booyah: iPhone Game Startup Gets $4.5M in Funding]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/03/06/does-iphone-need-the-ifund/#comment-195425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] in Series A financing from the iFund of Kleiner Perkins Caufield &amp; Byers. (Om wrote about KPCB&#8217;s $100 million app funding initiative last year.) The funding comes a month after Ngmoco, another iPhone game startup, launched with [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in Series A financing from the iFund of Kleiner Perkins Caufield &amp; Byers. (Om wrote about KPCB&#8217;s $100 million app funding initiative last year.) The funding comes a month after Ngmoco, another iPhone game startup, launched with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iFund Has Invested in 5 Companies So Far - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/06/does-iphone-need-the-ifund/#comment-195424</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[iFund Has Invested in 5 Companies So Far - GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 20:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/03/06/does-iphone-need-the-ifund/#comment-195424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] and said the names of three more would be revealed sometime between September and November. Given that the iFund was only announced back in March, I am surprised by the number of startups they&#8217;re investing [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and said the names of three more would be revealed sometime between September and November. Given that the iFund was only announced back in March, I am surprised by the number of startups they&#8217;re investing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iPhone Applications are VCs Favorite! What about Android? &#124;&#124; Technology Nerd</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/06/does-iphone-need-the-ifund/#comment-195423</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[iPhone Applications are VCs Favorite! What about Android? &#124;&#124; Technology Nerd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 13:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/03/06/does-iphone-need-the-ifund/#comment-195423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] read about the 100 million dollar fund(iFund) for iPhone applications companies, Gene Munster&#8217;s predictions of $1.2 billion [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read about the 100 million dollar fund(iFund) for iPhone applications companies, Gene Munster&#8217;s predictions of $1.2 billion [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pavle Shirkov</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/06/does-iphone-need-the-ifund/#comment-195422</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pavle Shirkov]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 04:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/03/06/does-iphone-need-the-ifund/#comment-195422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Missed out on Facebook&quot;?

Don&#039;t forget Facebook doesn&#039;t make any money.  %99.9 percent of this web 2.0 stuff is hyped garbage.  Successful businesses solve a problem - they don&#039;t wildly guess what the market might want....that&#039;s what fad chasing twitter heads do.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Missed out on Facebook&#8221;?</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t forget Facebook doesn&#8217;t make any money.  %99.9 percent of this web 2.0 stuff is hyped garbage.  Successful businesses solve a problem &#8211; they don&#8217;t wildly guess what the market might want&#8230;.that&#8217;s what fad chasing twitter heads do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Venture Capitalists Eyeing iPhone Start-Ups - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/06/does-iphone-need-the-ifund/#comment-195421</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Venture Capitalists Eyeing iPhone Start-Ups - GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/03/06/does-iphone-need-the-ifund/#comment-195421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the Facebook platform, this year the new new thing are iPhone application makers. In addition to the $100 million, iFund floated by Kleiner Perkins Caufield &amp; Byers, other VCs are getting in on the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Facebook platform, this year the new new thing are iPhone application makers. In addition to the $100 million, iFund floated by Kleiner Perkins Caufield &#38; Byers, other VCs are getting in on the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Android: Much Coolness, But 3 Big Problems - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/06/does-iphone-need-the-ifund/#comment-195420</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Android: Much Coolness, But 3 Big Problems - GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 17:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/03/06/does-iphone-need-the-ifund/#comment-195420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] by big carriers on their captive hardware/software offerings, especially those designed for the already popular iPhone.  With a big crowd overall and packed rooms at Android-specific discussions, the Google I/O [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by big carriers on their captive hardware/software offerings, especially those designed for the already popular iPhone.  With a big crowd overall and packed rooms at Android-specific discussions, the Google I/O [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: And Now a Blackberry Fund &#124; DougsTech.com - Tech News, Reviews, and Guides</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/06/does-iphone-need-the-ifund/#comment-195419</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[And Now a Blackberry Fund &#124; DougsTech.com - Tech News, Reviews, and Guides]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 01:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/03/06/does-iphone-need-the-ifund/#comment-195419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] development departments is now being replaced by venture capital. A fund to foster Facebook apps, the iFund to jump start the iPhone app revolution or the rumored $150 million fund to give Blackberry apps a [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] development departments is now being replaced by venture capital. A fund to foster Facebook apps, the iFund to jump start the iPhone app revolution or the rumored $150 million fund to give Blackberry apps a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: And Now a Blackberry Fund - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/06/does-iphone-need-the-ifund/#comment-195418</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[And Now a Blackberry Fund - GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 20:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/03/06/does-iphone-need-the-ifund/#comment-195418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] development departments is now being replaced by venture capital. A fund to foster Facebook apps, the iFund to jump start the iPhone app revolution or the rumored $150 million fund to give Blackberry apps a [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] development departments is now being replaced by venture capital. A fund to foster Facebook apps, the iFund to jump start the iPhone app revolution or the rumored $150 million fund to give Blackberry apps a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/06/does-iphone-need-the-ifund/#comment-195417</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stefan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 18:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/03/06/does-iphone-need-the-ifund/#comment-195417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Does anyone knw who the investors in the iFund are?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone knw who the investors in the iFund are?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2008-03-09 &#124; stuart henshall</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/06/does-iphone-need-the-ifund/#comment-195416</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[links for 2008-03-09 &#124; stuart henshall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 08:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/03/06/does-iphone-need-the-ifund/#comment-195416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Does iPhone Need The iFund? - GigaOM I like Om&#8217;s realism in this post. He&#8217;s correct they will have to sell a lot more phone! Thus my tongue in cheek 100 million number the other day. I&#8217;m less certain about the carriers and apps. The Carriers need to do a better job of thinking through WiFi. (tags: iphone ifund gigaom wifi)    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: &quot;links for 2008-03-09&quot;, url: &quot;http://www.henshall.com/stuart/2008/03/09/links-for-2008-03-09/&quot; }); [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Does iPhone Need The iFund? &#8211; GigaOM I like Om&#8217;s realism in this post. He&#8217;s correct they will have to sell a lot more phone! Thus my tongue in cheek 100 million number the other day. I&#8217;m less certain about the carriers and apps. The Carriers need to do a better job of thinking through WiFi. (tags: iphone ifund gigaom wifi)    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: &#8220;links for 2008-03-09&#8243;, url: &#8220;http://www.henshall.com/stuart/2008/03/09/links-for-2008-03-09/&#8221; }); [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve bell</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/06/does-iphone-need-the-ifund/#comment-195415</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steve bell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 06:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/03/06/does-iphone-need-the-ifund/#comment-195415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;there is a quote at the end of Om&#039;s post, about Steve Jobs.  It seems to be there out of context; their is no attribution.  It just says &quot;MacWorld&quot; at the end.  Just wondering who that&#039;s from?  (Did Door say that at the Apple event?)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;re: the KP &quot;iFund&quot;, I&#039;m puzzled how venture capital scale investments will be made in iPhone software application developers.  Unless they decide to make seed level investments of $250-500k.  Those companies aren&#039;t that resource intensive, but more importantly they aren&#039;t going to &quot;grow up&quot; into $200M+ revenue operations.  Wish Door would have explained exactly what he is thinking. But it&#039;s great to see something that will stimulate some true Apple-style innovation in the mobile computing market!  I just hope the iFund isn&#039;t iHype:)&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there is a quote at the end of Om&#8217;s post, about Steve Jobs.  It seems to be there out of context; their is no attribution.  It just says &#8220;MacWorld&#8221; at the end.  Just wondering who that&#8217;s from?  (Did Door say that at the Apple event?)</p>
<p>re: the KP &#8220;iFund&#8221;, I&#8217;m puzzled how venture capital scale investments will be made in iPhone software application developers.  Unless they decide to make seed level investments of $250-500k.  Those companies aren&#8217;t that resource intensive, but more importantly they aren&#8217;t going to &#8220;grow up&#8221; into $200M+ revenue operations.  Wish Door would have explained exactly what he is thinking. But it&#8217;s great to see something that will stimulate some true Apple-style innovation in the mobile computing market!  I just hope the iFund isn&#8217;t iHype:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Sigal</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/03/06/does-iphone-need-the-ifund/#comment-195414</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Sigal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 22:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/03/06/does-iphone-need-the-ifund/#comment-195414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Hey Om,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As to the question of whether iPhone needs the iFund, that is debate-able but I think that from Jobs and company perspective, what they are trying to show is that &#039;we get it.&#039;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Understanding big customers like enterprises matters.  Cultivating and growing a developer ecosystem matters.  And providing enough chum to garner VC interest matters.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I would net this one out as Microsoft playbook meets Cisco playbook tuned for the &#039;just add water&#039; sensibility of the internet age.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Now, when you say, &quot;...any start-up or developer will have its destiny controlled by Apple...I am just trying to understand how a big standalone company will emerge when Apple is going to be gatekeeper,&quot; this belies just how many big companies emerged from the Microsoft ecosystem.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The devil is in the details but I am more optimist than skeptic.  Along those lines, I just posted:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Mobile reasons for optimism:
http://thenetworkgarden.com/weblog/2008/03/mobile-reasons.html&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s an attempt to connect the dots between the customer-developer-enterprise-investor-Apple big picture.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Check it out if interested.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Cheers,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Mark&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Om,</p>
<p>As to the question of whether iPhone needs the iFund, that is debate-able but I think that from Jobs and company perspective, what they are trying to show is that &#8216;we get it.&#8217;</p>
<p>Understanding big customers like enterprises matters.  Cultivating and growing a developer ecosystem matters.  And providing enough chum to garner VC interest matters.</p>
<p>I would net this one out as Microsoft playbook meets Cisco playbook tuned for the &#8216;just add water&#8217; sensibility of the internet age.</p>
<p>Now, when you say, &#8220;&#8230;any start-up or developer will have its destiny controlled by Apple&#8230;I am just trying to understand how a big standalone company will emerge when Apple is going to be gatekeeper,&#8221; this belies just how many big companies emerged from the Microsoft ecosystem.</p>
<p>The devil is in the details but I am more optimist than skeptic.  Along those lines, I just posted:</p>
<p>Mobile reasons for optimism:<br />
<a href="http://thenetworkgarden.com/weblog/2008/03/mobile-reasons.html" rel="nofollow">http://thenetworkgarden.com/weblog/2008/03/mobile-reasons.html</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s an attempt to connect the dots between the customer-developer-enterprise-investor-Apple big picture.</p>
<p>Check it out if interested.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

