<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 10 Things You Need to Know About LTE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/02/26/10-things-you-need-to-know-about-lte/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/26/10-things-you-need-to-know-about-lte/</link>
	<description>Tracking the Internet Evolution</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 23:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: VG</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/26/10-things-you-need-to-know-about-lte/#comment-901863</link>
		<dc:creator>VG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 03:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11585#comment-901863</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Do you know if anyone can send info/link on the evolution of 3G/4G technologies as well as femto, wimax?

VG</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Do you know if anyone can send info/link on the evolution of 3G/4G technologies as well as femto, wimax?</p>
<p>VG</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Following 4G: The State of LTE - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/26/10-things-you-need-to-know-about-lte/#comment-894528</link>
		<dc:creator>Following 4G: The State of LTE - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 05:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11585#comment-894528</guid>
		<description>[...] 10 Things You Need to Know about LTE [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 10 Things You Need to Know about LTE [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mo</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/26/10-things-you-need-to-know-about-lte/#comment-890344</link>
		<dc:creator>Mo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 07:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11585#comment-890344</guid>
		<description>I understand that the capacity to a 3G/UMTS cell is 3.84Mcps. May I know what the capacity toa 3GPP/LTE cell is? 

Surely, I appreciate the information available on this website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand that the capacity to a 3G/UMTS cell is 3.84Mcps. May I know what the capacity toa 3GPP/LTE cell is? </p>
<p>Surely, I appreciate the information available on this website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The WiMAX Roller Coaster &#171; Network Observations</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/26/10-things-you-need-to-know-about-lte/#comment-884276</link>
		<dc:creator>The WiMAX Roller Coaster &#171; Network Observations</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11585#comment-884276</guid>
		<description>[...] month. Although WiMAX has a time advantage, with other major communication players lining up behind LTE, it may not matter. Hamblen&#8217;s article goes on to state: &#8220;WiMax and LTE are directly [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] month. Although WiMAX has a time advantage, with other major communication players lining up behind LTE, it may not matter. Hamblen&#8217;s article goes on to state: &#8220;WiMax and LTE are directly [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ericsson all-ready with 700 MHz gear - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/26/10-things-you-need-to-know-about-lte/#comment-865426</link>
		<dc:creator>Ericsson all-ready with 700 MHz gear - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11585#comment-865426</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] will support HSPA for now and in 2009 Ericsson will bring to market products based on 4G technology called LTE. If your technology choice is WiMAX, which is another technology that might be in the running for [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] will support HSPA for now and in 2009 Ericsson will bring to market products based on 4G technology called LTE. If your technology choice is WiMAX, which is another technology that might be in the running for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Little 4G Sibling Rivalry - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/26/10-things-you-need-to-know-about-lte/#comment-864235</link>
		<dc:creator>A Little 4G Sibling Rivalry - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 13:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11585#comment-864235</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] 5, 2008 at 12:00 AM PT Comments (1)   After writing up a storm about the next-generation cellular Long-Term Evolution standard a few weeks ago, I noticed that several commenters were confused, critical or just plain [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 5, 2008 at 12:00 AM PT Comments (1)   After writing up a storm about the next-generation cellular Long-Term Evolution standard a few weeks ago, I noticed that several commenters were confused, critical or just plain [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/26/10-things-you-need-to-know-about-lte/#comment-863953</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 23:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11585#comment-863953</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;There is heaps of preproduction equipment out there now for testing.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Peak download rates of 326.4 Mbit/s for 4x4 antennas, 172.8 Mbit/s for 2x2 antennas for every 20 MHz of spectrum.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Want to give a service with even more bandwidth than that? Easy, just give more spectrum in any of LTE's 11 bands - in slices as small as 1.25MHz!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Nice.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is heaps of preproduction equipment out there now for testing.</p>
<p>Peak download rates of 326.4 Mbit/s for 4&#215;4 antennas, 172.8 Mbit/s for 2&#215;2 antennas for every 20 MHz of spectrum.</p>
<p>Want to give a service with even more bandwidth than that? Easy, just give more spectrum in any of LTE&#8217;s 11 bands - in slices as small as 1.25MHz!</p>
<p>Nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kopelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/26/10-things-you-need-to-know-about-lte/#comment-863520</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Kopelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 22:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11585#comment-863520</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;K, I like WiMAX too, but you are just plain wrong. LTE is definitely a 4G technology -- its very name demonstrates this: Long Term Evolution (of UMTS). The long term evolution of a 3G technology would be, by definition 4G. As for WiMAX, FDMA is currently unsupported. Yes, there is support in 802.16e, but so far no finalized profile from the WiMAX Forum. Without the profile, there is no non-proprietary equipment and thus no way to do a wide-scale commercial deployment. That said, there would be such a profile damn quick if Verizon or the like showed interest, so I do agree that if they wanted to Verizon could certainly deploy WiMAX.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>K, I like WiMAX too, but you are just plain wrong. LTE is definitely a 4G technology &#8212; its very name demonstrates this: Long Term Evolution (of UMTS). The long term evolution of a 3G technology would be, by definition 4G. As for WiMAX, FDMA is currently unsupported. Yes, there is support in 802.16e, but so far no finalized profile from the WiMAX Forum. Without the profile, there is no non-proprietary equipment and thus no way to do a wide-scale commercial deployment. That said, there would be such a profile damn quick if Verizon or the like showed interest, so I do agree that if they wanted to Verizon could certainly deploy WiMAX.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/26/10-things-you-need-to-know-about-lte/#comment-863367</link>
		<dc:creator>K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 22:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11585#comment-863367</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;LTE is a 3G technology. Wimax is currently the only FDMA MIMO configuration in the United States.
Verizon is just trying to buy more time before having to finally decide it's next move... aka: waiting to see if sprint does well.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LTE is a 3G technology. Wimax is currently the only FDMA MIMO configuration in the United States.<br />
Verizon is just trying to buy more time before having to finally decide it&#8217;s next move&#8230; aka: waiting to see if sprint does well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Han Lee</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/26/10-things-you-need-to-know-about-lte/#comment-863365</link>
		<dc:creator>Han Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 22:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11585#comment-863365</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@ #9.  Chinese government will not skip 3G all together.  Face problems regarding the state sponsored TD-SCDMA technology.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ #9.  Chinese government will not skip 3G all together.  Face problems regarding the state sponsored TD-SCDMA technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/26/10-things-you-need-to-know-about-lte/#comment-863306</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11585#comment-863306</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Theoretical or even tested throughput of either technology is a moot point. The maximum throughput of either WiMAX or LTE will be limited by the backhaul capacity of the nearest WiMAX or LTE cell site. WiMAX has been tested at much higher speeds than what Sprint or Clearwire will be making available to the public. AT&#38;T and Verizon will be limited by the same backhaul capacity with LTE.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The best analogy I can give is your home network vs. your Internet connection speeds.  I have a wired and wireless network in my house. My wired capacity is 100Mbps; my wireless capacity is 54Mbps; but, my connection to the Internet, which is analogous to the backhaul, is limited to 6Mbps up and 1Mbps down.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;WiMAX and LTE will be limited to the backhaul capacity of the nearest serving WiMAX or LTE cell site and the number of users utilizing the technology at one time... they will all be sharing the same backhaul pipe.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Theoretical or even tested throughput of either technology is a moot point. The maximum throughput of either WiMAX or LTE will be limited by the backhaul capacity of the nearest WiMAX or LTE cell site. WiMAX has been tested at much higher speeds than what Sprint or Clearwire will be making available to the public. AT&amp;T and Verizon will be limited by the same backhaul capacity with LTE.</p>
<p>The best analogy I can give is your home network vs. your Internet connection speeds.  I have a wired and wireless network in my house. My wired capacity is 100Mbps; my wireless capacity is 54Mbps; but, my connection to the Internet, which is analogous to the backhaul, is limited to 6Mbps up and 1Mbps down.</p>
<p>WiMAX and LTE will be limited to the backhaul capacity of the nearest serving WiMAX or LTE cell site and the number of users utilizing the technology at one time&#8230; they will all be sharing the same backhaul pipe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacey Higginbotham</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/26/10-things-you-need-to-know-about-lte/#comment-863298</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacey Higginbotham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11585#comment-863298</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Rambo, it has theoretically more capacity than WiMax, but since there are no deployments of LTE yet, we'll have to wait and see how it actually pans out. WiMax is being rolled out with Clearwire offering a form of WiMax service now and Sprint deploying its Xohm WiMax service this year.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Shah, LTE could threaten fiber if it can reach the speeds it advertises, but it won't be widely available for four more years or so.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rambo, it has theoretically more capacity than WiMax, but since there are no deployments of LTE yet, we&#8217;ll have to wait and see how it actually pans out. WiMax is being rolled out with Clearwire offering a form of WiMax service now and Sprint deploying its Xohm WiMax service this year.</p>
<p>Shah, LTE could threaten fiber if it can reach the speeds it advertises, but it won&#8217;t be widely available for four more years or so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shah Ullah</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/26/10-things-you-need-to-know-about-lte/#comment-863256</link>
		<dc:creator>Shah Ullah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 06:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11585#comment-863256</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;For the longest time, I thought that LTE was really just the promise of WiMax expanded: it is said to be IP-based and use OFDM, MIMO architecture.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://www2.nortel.com/go/news_detail.jsp?cat_id=-8055&#38;oid=100214455&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Certainly, I can see how WiMax can be subsumed into LTE and those that get WiMax right will have an upper hand when transitioning over to LTE.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Does LTE threaten fiber roll-outs? How does it compete with the new breed of satellite Internet technologies Japan has recently experimented with?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/02/23/tech/main3868521.shtml?source=RSSattr=HOME_3868521&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the longest time, I thought that LTE was really just the promise of WiMax expanded: it is said to be IP-based and use OFDM, MIMO architecture.</p>
<p> (<a href="http://www2.nortel.com/go/news_detail.jsp?cat_id=-8055&amp;oid=100214455" rel="nofollow">link</a>) </p>
<p>Certainly, I can see how WiMax can be subsumed into LTE and those that get WiMax right will have an upper hand when transitioning over to LTE.</p>
<p>Does LTE threaten fiber roll-outs? How does it compete with the new breed of satellite Internet technologies Japan has recently experimented with?</p>
<p> (<a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/02/23/tech/main3868521.shtml?source=RSSattr=HOME_3868521" rel="nofollow">link</a>) </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rambo</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/26/10-things-you-need-to-know-about-lte/#comment-863257</link>
		<dc:creator>rambo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 06:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11585#comment-863257</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;it would be nice to know how it stacks up against WiMax which is said to be ready for rollout.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it would be nice to know how it stacks up against WiMax which is said to be ready for rollout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
