<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We Ask for Cheap 60 GHz &#8212; and Get It</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/02/22/we-ask-for-cheap-60-ghz-and-get-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/22/we-ask-for-cheap-60-ghz-and-get-it/</link>
	<description>Tracking the Internet Evolution</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 07:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Too Many Signals: Delivering Wireless HD Video - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/22/we-ask-for-cheap-60-ghz-and-get-it/#comment-868161</link>
		<dc:creator>Too Many Signals: Delivering Wireless HD Video - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 08:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11576#comment-868161</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Other startups include SiBeam, which plans to have chips out this year. There are also various university research efforts a focused on this. It&#8217;ll probably be a few years before this technology makes it into [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Other startups include SiBeam, which plans to have chips out this year. There are also various university research efforts a focused on this. It&#8217;ll probably be a few years before this technology makes it into [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacey Higginbotham</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/22/we-ask-for-cheap-60-ghz-and-get-it/#comment-862735</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacey Higginbotham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 02:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11576#comment-862735</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Dan, I'm talking with Vubiq on Monday and hope to share more details from them next week, along with info from SiBeam. Berkeley also has a research group looking at CMOS 60 GHz chips.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://bwrc.eecs.berkeley.edu/Research/RF/ogre_project/&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan, I&#8217;m talking with Vubiq on Monday and hope to share more details from them next week, along with info from SiBeam. Berkeley also has a research group looking at CMOS 60 GHz chips.</p>
<p> (<a href="http://bwrc.eecs.berkeley.edu/Research/RF/ogre_project/" rel="nofollow">link</a>) </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: metarand &#187; Australia At Forefront in 60GHz CMOS SOC</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/22/we-ask-for-cheap-60-ghz-and-get-it/#comment-862656</link>
		<dc:creator>metarand &#187; Australia At Forefront in 60GHz CMOS SOC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11576#comment-862656</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] coverage here and here.   Share and [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] coverage here and here.   Share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/22/we-ask-for-cheap-60-ghz-and-get-it/#comment-862655</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11576#comment-862655</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I read the links to all three, and it looks like 60 GHz is coming fast.  Looking closely at all three press releases, though, I see that even though the Australians have made this announcement, they state that they are still a year away from making it available to the public.  SiBeam's announcement seems closer, stating that development kits will be available to "select customers" in the first quarter of 2008.  Only Vubiq appears to be actually taking orders right now, with their development systems available for $12,500.  Does anyone out there have more information about SiBeam and Vubiq?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read the links to all three, and it looks like 60 GHz is coming fast.  Looking closely at all three press releases, though, I see that even though the Australians have made this announcement, they state that they are still a year away from making it available to the public.  SiBeam&#8217;s announcement seems closer, stating that development kits will be available to &#8220;select customers&#8221; in the first quarter of 2008.  Only Vubiq appears to be actually taking orders right now, with their development systems available for $12,500.  Does anyone out there have more information about SiBeam and Vubiq?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
