<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We Ask for Cheap 60 GHz &#8212; and Get It</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/02/22/we-ask-for-cheap-60-ghz-and-get-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/22/we-ask-for-cheap-60-ghz-and-get-it/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:00:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Too Many Signals: Delivering Wireless HD Video - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/22/we-ask-for-cheap-60-ghz-and-get-it/#comment-868161</link>
		<dc:creator>Too Many Signals: Delivering Wireless HD Video - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 08:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11576#comment-868161</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Other startups include SiBeam, which plans to have chips out this year. There are also various university research efforts a focused on this. It&#8217;ll probably be a few years before this technology makes it into [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Other startups include SiBeam, which plans to have chips out this year. There are also various university research efforts a focused on this. It&#8217;ll probably be a few years before this technology makes it into [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacey Higginbotham</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/22/we-ask-for-cheap-60-ghz-and-get-it/#comment-862735</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacey Higginbotham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 02:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11576#comment-862735</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Dan, I&#039;m talking with Vubiq on Monday and hope to share more details from them next week, along with info from SiBeam. Berkeley also has a research group looking at CMOS 60 GHz chips.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://bwrc.eecs.berkeley.edu/Research/RF/ogre_project/&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan, I&#8217;m talking with Vubiq on Monday and hope to share more details from them next week, along with info from SiBeam. Berkeley also has a research group looking at CMOS 60 GHz chips.</p>

<p><a href="http://bwrc.eecs.berkeley.edu/Research/RF/ogre_project/" rel="nofollow">http://bwrc.eecs.berkeley.edu/Research/RF/ogre_project/</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: metarand &#187; Australia At Forefront in 60GHz CMOS SOC</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/22/we-ask-for-cheap-60-ghz-and-get-it/#comment-862656</link>
		<dc:creator>metarand &#187; Australia At Forefront in 60GHz CMOS SOC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11576#comment-862656</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] coverage here and here.   Share and [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] coverage here and here.   Share and [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/22/we-ask-for-cheap-60-ghz-and-get-it/#comment-862655</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11576#comment-862655</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I read the links to all three, and it looks like 60 GHz is coming fast.  Looking closely at all three press releases, though, I see that even though the Australians have made this announcement, they state that they are still a year away from making it available to the public.  SiBeam&#039;s announcement seems closer, stating that development kits will be available to &quot;select customers&quot; in the first quarter of 2008.  Only Vubiq appears to be actually taking orders right now, with their development systems available for $12,500.  Does anyone out there have more information about SiBeam and Vubiq?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read the links to all three, and it looks like 60 GHz is coming fast.  Looking closely at all three press releases, though, I see that even though the Australians have made this announcement, they state that they are still a year away from making it available to the public.  SiBeam&#8217;s announcement seems closer, stating that development kits will be available to &#8220;select customers&#8221; in the first quarter of 2008.  Only Vubiq appears to be actually taking orders right now, with their development systems available for $12,500.  Does anyone out there have more information about SiBeam and Vubiq?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
