<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DNA Chips Might Break Moore&#8217;s Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/02/21/dna-chips-might-break-moores-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/21/dna-chips-might-break-moores-law/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:58:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Don&#8217;t Panic. Gartner Drops Chip Forecast</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/21/dna-chips-might-break-moores-law/#comment-918172</link>
		<dc:creator>Don&#8217;t Panic. Gartner Drops Chip Forecast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 15:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11558#comment-918172</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] panic just yet. The chip industry has withstood recessions, changes in business models and even tries to circumvent the laws of physics, so there&#8217;s still hope. Here are a few bright spots that should help the industry find its [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] panic just yet. The chip industry has withstood recessions, changes in business models and even tries to circumvent the laws of physics, so there&#8217;s still hope. Here are a few bright spots that should help the industry find its [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IBM&#8217;s Racetrack Memory Speeds Past Moore&#8217;s Law - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/21/dna-chips-might-break-moores-law/#comment-870634</link>
		<dc:creator>IBM&#8217;s Racetrack Memory Speeds Past Moore&#8217;s Law - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11558#comment-870634</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] around Moore&#8217;s Law. Of course, they&#8217;ve made that claim in the past with some of their DNA chip research. Maybe they just want a law named after someone who works at Big Blue?      Rating: None Thumbs Up [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] around Moore&#8217;s Law. Of course, they&#8217;ve made that claim in the past with some of their DNA chip research. Maybe they just want a law named after someone who works at Big Blue?      Rating: None Thumbs Up [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Fagan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/21/dna-chips-might-break-moores-law/#comment-862601</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Fagan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 02:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11558#comment-862601</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Nanotechnology is definately going to push Moore&#039;s law to the limit.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nanotechnology is definately going to push Moore&#8217;s law to the limit.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Steege</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/21/dna-chips-might-break-moores-law/#comment-862532</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Steege</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11558#comment-862532</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m always skeptical when new technology claims to take us beyond Moore&#039;s Law, because Moore&#039;s Law has outlived even the most optimistic forecasts for its demise.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Not saying it will go on forever, but I&#039;m not convinced 10 nm is the limit, any more than 1 micron was 25 years ago. (I remember those claims!)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m always skeptical when new technology claims to take us beyond Moore&#8217;s Law, because Moore&#8217;s Law has outlived even the most optimistic forecasts for its demise.</p>

<p>Not saying it will go on forever, but I&#8217;m not convinced 10 nm is the limit, any more than 1 micron was 25 years ago. (I remember those claims!)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
