Despite layoffs and a hotly contested acquisition offer from Microsoft, Yahoo found the time to relaunch the video section of its site last night. But the revamped site is an inadvertent metaphor for all the reasons Yahoo’s in trouble. In addition to a redesign, new features […]

Despite layoffs and a hotly contested acquisition offer from Microsoft, Yahoo found the time to relaunch the video section of its site last night. But the revamped site is an inadvertent metaphor for all the reasons Yahoo’s in trouble.


In addition to a redesign, new features to the video section include a 16×9 player, larger file size limit for uploads, enhanced sharing options and in-depth profiles. The new look is clean and easy to navigate, and uploading videos is a snap. Yet it feels like a silo, devoid of a unified connection with the rest of the company. There is no real integration with the other divisions that could have made this so much more.

The current featured video is the new trailer for Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull. The trailer’s video page contains the video, the standard synopsis rating and playcount info, comments and related vids. But what you’d never know from just looking at it is that Yahoo has the exclusive with that trailer, and that just a click away at Yahoo Movies, there is a special Indiana Jones mini-section with previous Indy movie trailers, cast photos and more.

To be fair, there is a small link on the video homepage to this section. But why not either take people to the movie page (where the trailer’s in HD) or have the videos page announce that there are extra Indy goodies on the movie page?

Also baffling is the lack of promotion for all the other things you can do with your videos — on Yahoo — once you’ve uploaded it. The only mention of the online editing capabilities of Yahoo’s Jumpcut is at the bottom of the page. Again, this is a wasted opportunity; why not put that in big, bold letters? “Hey, we have an easy way for you to edit your video and here’s how!” Furthermore, even though I was signed in to Yahoo Video, when I clicked on “Edit video with Jumpcut,” it took me to the Jumpcut section, but didn’t recognize me. I had to sign in again.


When companies get too big, they don’t communicate well internally. People protect their turf. There are politics involved. Watching or sharing video is becoming a key activity on the web, and Yahoo has the means to enhance that experience with all the tools it offers. But Yahoo didn’t. And with the prospect of the company becoming part of a bigger Microsoft (or someone else), chances are good it won’t.

You’re subscribed! If you like, you can update your settings

  1. What’s wrong with Yahoo? Take a look at its new video site, and get a clue. – GigaOM Friday, February 15, 2008

    [...] night. But the revamped site is an inadvertent metaphor for all the reasons Yahoo’s in trouble. Continue Reading @ NewTeeVee Share/Send Sphere Print Previous Post Next [...]

  2. What ever happened to Jumpcut? I thought they were going to be integrated into all of the video functionality?

  3. It is not a lack of communication, nor politics. I suppose it’s sensationalistic to think so.

    Do you even know who worked on the new video site?

  4. foryourimagination Friday, February 15, 2008

    Did you notice that most user favorites, fans, contacts and even some video ratings were wiped clean? Not a great launch when you wipe out the community.

  5. 1) Why don’t they just focus on Video Search?

    2) For a company that was at the forefront of MediaRSS, why can’t they even get their RSS right (no enclosures/swf files, feed doesn’t even come close to validating in feedvalidator.org).

  6. Well… This is not lookingto be too bright of a decision for a company that’s trying to fight back the wolves to bring in the sheep. What a blown opportunity …Whoa is Yahoo.

  7. I blogged on this same topic. Here is an excerpt:

    Yahoo, despite a magnificent footprint of users and services used by users, not to mention content, media and agency relationships, has never seemed to be able to connect the dots for their users.

    This is a cardinal sin, but organizationally, they are too silo’d to cross that chasm, which is their folly.

    Check out the full post if interested:




  8. former Yahoo employee Friday, February 15, 2008

    To the “someone” who claims this is not about politics, as a recently laid off Yahoo! employee, I would like to counter that it indeed is. There is in fact no internal coordination between groups that hold the key to connected functionality for one or the other site. Product managers are distributed over multiple properties, some of which might not report into the same overall “division.” Trying to get things done when you have to scale up the divisional hierarchies, and the back down again, can be a nightmare, and most teams give up and implement what’s on their roadmap. There are no rewards for attempting to improve the system, and most short term benefits derive from launching what you can with the aid of your own team’s resources.

    Om is absolutely right about this one. What’s happening on Y! Videos, and indeed on multiple Y! sites, is very symptomatic of what’s wrong with Yahoo! as a company.

  9. former Yahoo employee Friday, February 15, 2008

    I meant, “Chris is absolutely right…” in the previous comment. I thought I was reading Om Malik’s blog because it had pointed to this post.

  10. What’s Wrong with Yahoo! | www.univalleihe.org Friday, February 15, 2008

    [...] Here is one person’s opinion about what is wrong with Yahoo!. Although there some good points in this post, it is challenging to coordinate the efforts of just so many people. If Microsoft is supposed to sort out all of the initiatives that Yahoo! has undertaken and fix them… We are in trouble. Last I looked, as successful as Microsoft is, they still haven’t standardized on what <CTL>+F does in its various programs. [...]

Comments have been disabled for this post