<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Symbian Bullish On The Future</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/02/12/symbian-bullish-on-the-future/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/12/symbian-bullish-on-the-future/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:44:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/12/symbian-bullish-on-the-future/#comment-193406</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 18:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=11482#comment-193406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;The Symbian numbers are misleading.  They include Series 40, 60 and 90 phones, and I suspect 85% of the numbers are Series 40 feature phones.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Isn&#039;t part of the game mindshare for developers?  I don&#039;t know enough about programming, but the various versions of symbian all look very different.  You can&#039;t make on application to fit them all (s40, s60, UIQ).  S60 itself has different &quot;Feature Packs&quot; which are occasionally incompatible.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you are comparing smartphone, I think we should only be comparing s60 phones with the iphones.   I haven&#039;t seen those numbers,.  From a developer&#039;s point of view, where would I rather work:  on Symbian with a very confusing tiered OS, or with the Iphone/Ipod touch mobile web?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I compare it to Honda vs. GM.  GM has have more diversity -- but Honda has the Accord (best seller).  The cloud is moves to the single platform.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Symbian numbers are misleading.  They include Series 40, 60 and 90 phones, and I suspect 85% of the numbers are Series 40 feature phones.</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t part of the game mindshare for developers?  I don&#8217;t know enough about programming, but the various versions of symbian all look very different.  You can&#8217;t make on application to fit them all (s40, s60, UIQ).  S60 itself has different &#8220;Feature Packs&#8221; which are occasionally incompatible.</p>
<p>If you are comparing smartphone, I think we should only be comparing s60 phones with the iphones.   I haven&#8217;t seen those numbers,.  From a developer&#8217;s point of view, where would I rather work:  on Symbian with a very confusing tiered OS, or with the Iphone/Ipod touch mobile web?</p>
<p>I compare it to Honda vs. GM.  GM has have more diversity &#8212; but Honda has the Accord (best seller).  The cloud is moves to the single platform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

