<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Much Did Microsoft Pay For Danger?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/02/12/how-much-did-microsoft-pay-for-danger-find-out-here/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/12/how-much-did-microsoft-pay-for-danger-find-out-here/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:24:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft acquires Danger Inc &#124; Microsoft News Tracker</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/12/how-much-did-microsoft-pay-for-danger-find-out-here/#comment-977777</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft acquires Danger Inc &#124; Microsoft News Tracker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=11484#comment-977777</guid>
		<description>[...] Om Malik reports a rumor that Microsoft paid US $500 million and offers a rationale for this largesse.     Filed under Acquisitions, Coopetition, Danger, Inc., [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Om Malik reports a rumor that Microsoft paid US $500 million and offers a rationale for this largesse.     Filed under Acquisitions, Coopetition, Danger, Inc., [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to Burn $500 Million in a Weekend</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/12/how-much-did-microsoft-pay-for-danger-find-out-here/#comment-977625</link>
		<dc:creator>How to Burn $500 Million in a Weekend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 20:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=11484#comment-977625</guid>
		<description>[...] left thousands of customers without their personal information, Danger Inc., a company Microsoft bought for about half-a-billion last year is fast becoming worthless. T-Mobile USA, its biggest champion (and arguably the biggest [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] left thousands of customers without their personal information, Danger Inc., a company Microsoft bought for about half-a-billion last year is fast becoming worthless. T-Mobile USA, its biggest champion (and arguably the biggest [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Exclusive: Pink Danger leaks from Microsoft&#8217;s Windows Phone &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/12/how-much-did-microsoft-pay-for-danger-find-out-here/#comment-977070</link>
		<dc:creator>Exclusive: Pink Danger leaks from Microsoft&#8217;s Windows Phone &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 04:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=11484#comment-977070</guid>
		<description>[...] report is bad news for Microsoft given that less than two years ago it paid a reported $500 million to acquire Danger, the developer behind the T-Mobile Sidekick. Microsoft&#8217;s 2008 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] report is bad news for Microsoft given that less than two years ago it paid a reported $500 million to acquire Danger, the developer behind the T-Mobile Sidekick. Microsoft&#8217;s 2008 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SmartPhones Sales Up, But Mobile Startup Funding Down</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/12/how-much-did-microsoft-pay-for-danger-find-out-here/#comment-963947</link>
		<dc:creator>SmartPhones Sales Up, But Mobile Startup Funding Down</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 06:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=11484#comment-963947</guid>
		<description>[...] year there were three major deals adding up to over $600 million. These included Microsoft&#8217;s purchase of Sidekick-maker, Danger for $500 million. In the first half of 2009 there were quite a few acquisitions though many of them were small and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] year there were three major deals adding up to over $600 million. These included Microsoft&#8217;s purchase of Sidekick-maker, Danger for $500 million. In the first half of 2009 there were quite a few acquisitions though many of them were small and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft débourse 500 millions dans le &#8220;Danger&#8221; - Gizmodo - Tant d'amour pour ces fabuleux nouveaux gadgets, c'est surnaturel.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/12/how-much-did-microsoft-pay-for-danger-find-out-here/#comment-890291</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft débourse 500 millions dans le &#8220;Danger&#8221; - Gizmodo - Tant d'amour pour ces fabuleux nouveaux gadgets, c'est surnaturel.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 23:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=11484#comment-890291</guid>
		<description>[...] source pas toujours fiable, mais si c&#8217;est vrai il reste du cash pour encore séduire Yahoo!. [GigaOM et TheInquirer en [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] source pas toujours fiable, mais si c&#8217;est vrai il reste du cash pour encore séduire Yahoo!. [GigaOM et TheInquirer en [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cyrus Kazemi &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Old: Microsoft Buys Danger</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/12/how-much-did-microsoft-pay-for-danger-find-out-here/#comment-890074</link>
		<dc:creator>Cyrus Kazemi &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Old: Microsoft Buys Danger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 21:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=11484#comment-890074</guid>
		<description>[...] the maker of the popular Sidekick from T-Mobile, was purchased for an undisclosed amount of money. Some people estimate as much as $500 million dollars, given that Danger has raised over $140 million in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the maker of the popular Sidekick from T-Mobile, was purchased for an undisclosed amount of money. Some people estimate as much as $500 million dollars, given that Danger has raised over $140 million in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: euro2008</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/12/how-much-did-microsoft-pay-for-danger-find-out-here/#comment-883660</link>
		<dc:creator>euro2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 00:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=11484#comment-883660</guid>
		<description>What did MS pay for? Danger WAS a platform way ahead of it’s time, but it never advanced… If they were getting Andy Rubin’s innovation, it would be a better story. There’s no way they will be able to compete with Android. The only thing I can think is that they overpaid so they could aquire some specific patent…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What did MS pay for? Danger WAS a platform way ahead of it’s time, but it never advanced… If they were getting Andy Rubin’s innovation, it would be a better story. There’s no way they will be able to compete with Android. The only thing I can think is that they overpaid so they could aquire some specific patent…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: euro2006</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/12/how-much-did-microsoft-pay-for-danger-find-out-here/#comment-883659</link>
		<dc:creator>euro2006</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 00:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=11484#comment-883659</guid>
		<description>about EU and Justice Department creating problems when it comes to the pending Yahoo-bid and the Danger-deal. Specifically, Microsoft is implementing four new interoperability principles and corresponding</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>about EU and Justice Department creating problems when it comes to the pending Yahoo-bid and the Danger-deal. Specifically, Microsoft is implementing four new interoperability principles and corresponding</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eng-club</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/12/how-much-did-microsoft-pay-for-danger-find-out-here/#comment-883473</link>
		<dc:creator>eng-club</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=11484#comment-883473</guid>
		<description>Danger always intended for the OS to be open as a development platform. However, T-Mobile doesn’t like open platforms, so end of story from that angle. It wouldn’t take more than a flick of a switch from Danger and all kinds of cool apps would be released for the Sidekick family.

There is certainly decent IP that MSFT is buying, which helps when Qualcomm, NTP, RIM and others are in the space. Android’s IP is likely inconsequential with respect to these other players.

It’s funny, but people in the Valley still haven’t learned that Open in mobile doesn’t mean a darned thing until carriers are forced to accept it. The ONLY way that open will really happen is when new networks with 1/10th the cost per bit come on line and threaten the existing model. It’s possible that WiMax might be exactly that network, but remember that the two biggest WiMax players in the US are Sprint and Clearwire. McCaw owns Clearwire, and he’s no dummy and will clearly sell out in a minute to the highest bidder, which will invariably be AT&amp;T, Sprint or Verizon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Danger always intended for the OS to be open as a development platform. However, T-Mobile doesn’t like open platforms, so end of story from that angle. It wouldn’t take more than a flick of a switch from Danger and all kinds of cool apps would be released for the Sidekick family.</p>
<p>There is certainly decent IP that MSFT is buying, which helps when Qualcomm, NTP, RIM and others are in the space. Android’s IP is likely inconsequential with respect to these other players.</p>
<p>It’s funny, but people in the Valley still haven’t learned that Open in mobile doesn’t mean a darned thing until carriers are forced to accept it. The ONLY way that open will really happen is when new networks with 1/10th the cost per bit come on line and threaten the existing model. It’s possible that WiMax might be exactly that network, but remember that the two biggest WiMax players in the US are Sprint and Clearwire. McCaw owns Clearwire, and he’s no dummy and will clearly sell out in a minute to the highest bidder, which will invariably be AT&amp;T, Sprint or Verizon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: List of Q1 2008 Web/Internet/Technology Acquisitions &#187; The StartUp Blog at PartnerUp</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/12/how-much-did-microsoft-pay-for-danger-find-out-here/#comment-879348</link>
		<dc:creator>List of Q1 2008 Web/Internet/Technology Acquisitions &#187; The StartUp Blog at PartnerUp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 14:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=11484#comment-879348</guid>
		<description>[...] is the maker of the Sidekick cell phone. Press Release &#124; TechCrunch &#124; GigaOm &#124; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is the maker of the Sidekick cell phone. Press Release | TechCrunch | GigaOm | [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SILICON ALLEY INSIDER &#124; Microsoft Swallows Up Sidekick-Maker Danger, Buries It Deep In Org Chart Hell - MEDIA &#38; ENTERTAINMENT NEWS</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/12/how-much-did-microsoft-pay-for-danger-find-out-here/#comment-872192</link>
		<dc:creator>SILICON ALLEY INSIDER &#124; Microsoft Swallows Up Sidekick-Maker Danger, Buries It Deep In Org Chart Hell - MEDIA &#38; ENTERTAINMENT NEWS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 10:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=11484#comment-872192</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Microsoft has closed its acquisition of mobile software/platform maker Danger, for which it reportedly spent $500 million. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Microsoft has closed its acquisition of mobile software/platform maker Danger, for which it reportedly spent $500 million. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft、Dangerを買収。Danger社はIPO申請取り下げへ &#187; Mobile Venture News &#187; Tracking Emmerging U.S. Mobile Technologies and Companies for the Japanese Investment Community.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/12/how-much-did-microsoft-pay-for-danger-find-out-here/#comment-863064</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft、Dangerを買収。Danger社はIPO申請取り下げへ &#187; Mobile Venture News &#187; Tracking Emmerging U.S. Mobile Technologies and Companies for the Japanese Investment Community.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 07:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=11484#comment-863064</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] 以前IPO申請した際に取り上げたDanger社ですが、その後マイクロソフトが同社を買収、それを受けて申請は取り下げられました。ちなみに、買収額は明らかにされていませんが、$500M（5億ドル）とする見方もあります。 [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 以前IPO申請した際に取り上げたDanger社ですが、その後マイクロソフトが同社を買収、それを受けて申請は取り下げられました。ちなみに、買収額は明らかにされていませんが、$500M（5億ドル）とする見方もあります。 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: In Anchor &#187; SearchCap: The Day In Search, February 13, 2008</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/12/how-much-did-microsoft-pay-for-danger-find-out-here/#comment-862622</link>
		<dc:creator>In Anchor &#187; SearchCap: The Day In Search, February 13, 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 09:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=11484#comment-862622</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] How Much Did Microsoft Pay For Danger?, GigaOM [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How Much Did Microsoft Pay For Danger?, GigaOM [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft &#8220;Opens&#8221; Up, Interoperability New Mantra - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/12/how-much-did-microsoft-pay-for-danger-find-out-here/#comment-862537</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft &#8220;Opens&#8221; Up, Interoperability New Mantra - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=11484#comment-862537</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] about EU and Justice Department creating problems when it comes to the pending Yahoo-bid and  the Danger-deal. Specifically, Microsoft is implementing four new interoperability principles and corresponding [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] about EU and Justice Department creating problems when it comes to the pending Yahoo-bid and  the Danger-deal. Specifically, Microsoft is implementing four new interoperability principles and corresponding [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seoforblogs.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Comment on How Much Did Microsoft Pay For Danger? by SearchCap &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/12/how-much-did-microsoft-pay-for-danger-find-out-here/#comment-862358</link>
		<dc:creator>seoforblogs.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Comment on How Much Did Microsoft Pay For Danger? by SearchCap &#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=11484#comment-862358</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] lukaglobal wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt[…] How Much Did Microsoft Pay For Danger?, GigaOM […] [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] lukaglobal wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt[…] How Much Did Microsoft Pay For Danger?, GigaOM […] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SearchCap: The Day In Search, February 13, 2008 &#124; Novelty SEO - Search Engine Optimization, Search Engine Marketing, Internet Advertising, and Consulting</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/12/how-much-did-microsoft-pay-for-danger-find-out-here/#comment-862324</link>
		<dc:creator>SearchCap: The Day In Search, February 13, 2008 &#124; Novelty SEO - Search Engine Optimization, Search Engine Marketing, Internet Advertising, and Consulting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=11484#comment-862324</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] How Much Did Microsoft Pay For Danger?, GigaOM [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How Much Did Microsoft Pay For Danger?, GigaOM [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
