<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FCC May Examine &#8216;D&#8217; Block Auction Fiasco</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/02/11/fcc-may-examine-d-block-auction-fiasco/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/11/fcc-may-examine-d-block-auction-fiasco/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:47:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Why There Won&#8217;t Be Broadband Competition Anytime Soon - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/11/fcc-may-examine-d-block-auction-fiasco/#comment-901680</link>
		<dc:creator>Why There Won&#8217;t Be Broadband Competition Anytime Soon - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 20:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11455#comment-901680</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] using the spectrum between digital TV channels, the devil is in the details. Through rulemaking or setting incredibly high reserves, the FCC can cripple any wireless broadband competition. That means a network could look like it [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] using the spectrum between digital TV channels, the devil is in the details. Through rulemaking or setting incredibly high reserves, the FCC can cripple any wireless broadband competition. That means a network could look like it [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internet. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Verizon and AT&#38;T Score in 700Mhz Auction</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/11/fcc-may-examine-d-block-auction-fiasco/#comment-866710</link>
		<dc:creator>Internet. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Verizon and AT&#38;T Score in 700Mhz Auction</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 21:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11455#comment-866710</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] D block of spectrum that had been reserved for public safety but failed to meet minimum bid requirements in this auction will be set aside, and the FCC will figure out what to do with it later according [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] D block of spectrum that had been reserved for public safety but failed to meet minimum bid requirements in this auction will be set aside, and the FCC will figure out what to do with it later according [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Verizon and AT&#38;T Score in 700Mhz Auction - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/11/fcc-may-examine-d-block-auction-fiasco/#comment-866689</link>
		<dc:creator>Verizon and AT&#38;T Score in 700Mhz Auction - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 20:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11455#comment-866689</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] D block of spectrum that had been reserved for public safety but failed to meet minimum bid requirements in this auction will be set aside, and the FCC will figure out what to do with it later according [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] D block of spectrum that had been reserved for public safety but failed to meet minimum bid requirements in this auction will be set aside, and the FCC will figure out what to do with it later according [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ericsson all-ready with 700 MHz gear - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/11/fcc-may-examine-d-block-auction-fiasco/#comment-865425</link>
		<dc:creator>Ericsson all-ready with 700 MHz gear - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11455#comment-865425</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] at 6:56 AM PT Comments (0)   The 700 MHz auctions are finally coming to a close, meeting most if not all expectations. And soon this will set off a network buildout frenzy, especially among the upstarts who end up [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at 6:56 AM PT Comments (0)   The 700 MHz auctions are finally coming to a close, meeting most if not all expectations. And soon this will set off a network buildout frenzy, especially among the upstarts who end up [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: News Cast Live, formerly Mike Thinks News &#187; NewsCast LIVE #169 When lawyers rule&#8230;or rather now that Lawyers rule the world.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/11/fcc-may-examine-d-block-auction-fiasco/#comment-861115</link>
		<dc:creator>News Cast Live, formerly Mike Thinks News &#187; NewsCast LIVE #169 When lawyers rule&#8230;or rather now that Lawyers rule the world.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11455#comment-861115</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] action spectrum for [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] action spectrum for [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Sundman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/11/fcc-may-examine-d-block-auction-fiasco/#comment-860853</link>
		<dc:creator>John Sundman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 12:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11455#comment-860853</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;That&#039;s Harold Feld, not Harold Weld.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Otherwise, great post, and thanks for the attribution.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s Harold Feld, not Harold Weld.</p>

<p>Otherwise, great post, and thanks for the attribution.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
