<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Asleep At The Wheel: The Yahoo Board</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/02/08/asleep-at-the-wheel-the-yahoo-board/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/08/asleep-at-the-wheel-the-yahoo-board/</link>
	<description>The Business of Technology</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 07:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: After Yang, What Should Yahoo Do? - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/08/asleep-at-the-wheel-the-yahoo-board/#comment-913310</link>
		<dc:creator>After Yang, What Should Yahoo Do? - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 04:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11445#comment-913310</guid>
		<description>[...] to the head the company that was looking down a deep abyss a while back was an ineffectual one, and a total and absolute failure on the part of Yahoo’s board of directors. In June 2008, I wrote about the systematic rot inside the company. What hasn’t been discussed is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to the head the company that was looking down a deep abyss a while back was an ineffectual one, and a total and absolute failure on the part of Yahoo’s board of directors. In June 2008, I wrote about the systematic rot inside the company. What hasn’t been discussed is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Business News Research &#187; What&#8217;s Wrong With Yahoo? - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/08/asleep-at-the-wheel-the-yahoo-board/#comment-887271</link>
		<dc:creator>Business News Research &#187; What&#8217;s Wrong With Yahoo? - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 02:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11445#comment-887271</guid>
		<description>[...] a state of masterful inactivity, masked perhaps as a culture of consensus. This starts at the top - from the company&#8217;s board and senior management down to VP level where people are prone to organizing and attending twenty [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a state of masterful inactivity, masked perhaps as a culture of consensus. This starts at the top - from the company&#8217;s board and senior management down to VP level where people are prone to organizing and attending twenty [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oow, Eew, Ouch &#8230; Yahoo! - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/08/asleep-at-the-wheel-the-yahoo-board/#comment-883508</link>
		<dc:creator>Oow, Eew, Ouch &#8230; Yahoo! - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 03:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11445#comment-883508</guid>
		<description>[...] think this is yet another critical blunder by a company that lost its way back three years ago when then CEO Terry Semel lost interest in the company, putting in a path of mediocrity. Of course, as one of my gurus once said, in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] think this is yet another critical blunder by a company that lost its way back three years ago when then CEO Terry Semel lost interest in the company, putting in a path of mediocrity. Of course, as one of my gurus once said, in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft, Yahoo Back On, Or Not - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/08/asleep-at-the-wheel-the-yahoo-board/#comment-878935</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft, Yahoo Back On, Or Not - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 03:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11445#comment-878935</guid>
		<description>[...] a board.  Ichan’s move to put a new board in isn’t all that bad: Yahoo needs to clean house, as I had said a long time before holier-than-thou Carl showed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a board.  Ichan’s move to put a new board in isn’t all that bad: Yahoo needs to clean house, as I had said a long time before holier-than-thou Carl showed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: News Cast Live, formerly Mike Thinks News &#187; NewsCast LIVE #169 When lawyers rule&#8230;or rather now that Lawyers rule the world.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/08/asleep-at-the-wheel-the-yahoo-board/#comment-861113</link>
		<dc:creator>News Cast Live, formerly Mike Thinks News &#187; NewsCast LIVE #169 When lawyers rule&#8230;or rather now that Lawyers rule the world.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11445#comment-861113</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Yahoo says, thanks but err, nope. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Yahoo says, thanks but err, nope. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: online shopping store</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/08/asleep-at-the-wheel-the-yahoo-board/#comment-860925</link>
		<dc:creator>online shopping store</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 20:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11445#comment-860925</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yahoo is still the best and most beloved internet company and I don't support them to sell it. Whatever is the problem can be fixed. It appears that they are suffering from brain drain. Let them get rid of all top level executives. Bring new and fresh ones with fresh ideas and zeal. Then improve their services, especially the search engine service. It takes Microsoft Msn just 2-3 days to index and rank a website but 7-30 days for Yahoo. Let them start there: index and rank websites fast (2-3 days). Then let them start massive advertising so people will start using their engine to search for stuff and massive traffics would begin to flow as well as profits. All of this can be fixed with $1 billion dollars. Why throw away a  $100 billion dollars company loved by billions of people when it can be fixed with $1 billion dollars. I say to Jerry Yang and his borad of directors, if you can't fix it, hire me to do it for you free!!!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yahoo is still the best and most beloved internet company and I don&#8217;t support them to sell it. Whatever is the problem can be fixed. It appears that they are suffering from brain drain. Let them get rid of all top level executives. Bring new and fresh ones with fresh ideas and zeal. Then improve their services, especially the search engine service. It takes Microsoft Msn just 2-3 days to index and rank a website but 7-30 days for Yahoo. Let them start there: index and rank websites fast (2-3 days). Then let them start massive advertising so people will start using their engine to search for stuff and massive traffics would begin to flow as well as profits. All of this can be fixed with $1 billion dollars. Why throw away a  $100 billion dollars company loved by billions of people when it can be fixed with $1 billion dollars. I say to Jerry Yang and his borad of directors, if you can&#8217;t fix it, hire me to do it for you free!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/08/asleep-at-the-wheel-the-yahoo-board/#comment-860858</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 13:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11445#comment-860858</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;AOL? Of all companies? Even Microsoft is a better choice. Yahoo should be stay independent, all other options are taking us towards a world with less symbols and a plain monochromatic industry. By the way, this is hilarious: http://www.5min.com/Video/How-to-Negotiate---Tips-for-Yahoo-5794173&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AOL? Of all companies? Even Microsoft is a better choice. Yahoo should be stay independent, all other options are taking us towards a world with less symbols and a plain monochromatic industry. By the way, this is hilarious: <a href="http://www.5min.com/Video/How-to-Negotiate---Tips-for-Yahoo-5794173" rel="nofollow">http://www.5min.com/Video/How-to-Negotiate&#8212;Tips-for-Yahoo-5794173</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SiliconValley-JOBS</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/08/asleep-at-the-wheel-the-yahoo-board/#comment-860776</link>
		<dc:creator>SiliconValley-JOBS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 15:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11445#comment-860776</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Om Malik, I consider that Yahoo's board should realize that many talented executives are trying to leave the company since Microsoft disclosed its unsolicited merger proposal last week.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In fact, our company has been contacted by some of Yahoo's employees who are trying to get employment at other Silicon Valley startups, before it is too late.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Om Malik, I consider that Yahoo&#8217;s board should realize that many talented executives are trying to leave the company since Microsoft disclosed its unsolicited merger proposal last week.</p>
<p>In fact, our company has been contacted by some of Yahoo&#8217;s employees who are trying to get employment at other Silicon Valley startups, before it is too late.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft-Yahoo! - freakin amazing week &#171; A private Blog from Michael Jung.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/08/asleep-at-the-wheel-the-yahoo-board/#comment-860747</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft-Yahoo! - freakin amazing week &#171; A private Blog from Michael Jung.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 03:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11445#comment-860747</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] read a lot of blogs and comments on this (+trolls, +haters). The importances of this one is - to show you a quality comment of this story; A 62 percent premium to Yahoo’s stock price is as good an offer as Yahoo can hope for. The [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read a lot of blogs and comments on this (+trolls, +haters). The importances of this one is - to show you a quality comment of this story; A 62 percent premium to Yahoo’s stock price is as good an offer as Yahoo can hope for. The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wesley Long</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/08/asleep-at-the-wheel-the-yahoo-board/#comment-860744</link>
		<dc:creator>Wesley Long</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 02:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11445#comment-860744</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think one of things that gets overshadowed by Microsoft's 44 billion dollar bid is that fact that it is not Yahoo! that needs Microsoft. We should not forget who has more market share of the two. Microsoft approached Yahoo! for a reason, and that is because it most certainly has the most to gain. I personally commend Yahoo! for not folding because they are holding the aces, not Microsoft.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think one of things that gets overshadowed by Microsoft&#8217;s 44 billion dollar bid is that fact that it is not Yahoo! that needs Microsoft. We should not forget who has more market share of the two. Microsoft approached Yahoo! for a reason, and that is because it most certainly has the most to gain. I personally commend Yahoo! for not folding because they are holding the aces, not Microsoft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/08/asleep-at-the-wheel-the-yahoo-board/#comment-860717</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 21:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11445#comment-860717</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It appears they are rejecting the bid, not Microsoft.  Looks like the negotiation process may be underway.  Next, we can discuss the impact on Microsoft.  I've got my thoughts, but will let digest for awhile.  BTW, it's not good.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears they are rejecting the bid, not Microsoft.  Looks like the negotiation process may be underway.  Next, we can discuss the impact on Microsoft.  I&#8217;ve got my thoughts, but will let digest for awhile.  BTW, it&#8217;s not good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/08/asleep-at-the-wheel-the-yahoo-board/#comment-860704</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 20:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11445#comment-860704</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yahoo's entire history made it unsuited to dealing with Google.  Yang and Filo started out with a directory - editors picking significant web sites and placing them in categories for people to browse.  Totally top down.  They were thinking media from the start, not services, and this wound up killing them.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;With the Semel hire they brought in a guy who just knew a lot more about what they were already doing - editorial.  And their sports and finance sites show that they did keep improving in this area.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Had they thought of themselves as a services company, not a media company, they would have bought eBay when they had the chance.  They would have integrated social features, telephony and IM into mail earlier, and better. No clue what happened w/Flickr (how do you now integrate with print purchase?).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;By '05 they knew that Google's ad engine was much better, so they started Panama.  Would seeing themselves as a services company have helped?  Maybe.  This upgrade seems to have failed, taking out the keystone in their whole structure.  (I tried to integrate Yahoo ads into a site, found Yahoo's ad network interface to be virtually impenetrable, as if they didn't really want the business anyway.  Strange.)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And now the company will check into a hospital in Redmond for a little grave malpractice.  Take a good look at your loved one.  He will only return in a box.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yahoo&#8217;s entire history made it unsuited to dealing with Google.  Yang and Filo started out with a directory - editors picking significant web sites and placing them in categories for people to browse.  Totally top down.  They were thinking media from the start, not services, and this wound up killing them.</p>
<p>With the Semel hire they brought in a guy who just knew a lot more about what they were already doing - editorial.  And their sports and finance sites show that they did keep improving in this area.</p>
<p>Had they thought of themselves as a services company, not a media company, they would have bought eBay when they had the chance.  They would have integrated social features, telephony and IM into mail earlier, and better. No clue what happened w/Flickr (how do you now integrate with print purchase?).</p>
<p>By &#8216;05 they knew that Google&#8217;s ad engine was much better, so they started Panama.  Would seeing themselves as a services company have helped?  Maybe.  This upgrade seems to have failed, taking out the keystone in their whole structure.  (I tried to integrate Yahoo ads into a site, found Yahoo&#8217;s ad network interface to be virtually impenetrable, as if they didn&#8217;t really want the business anyway.  Strange.)</p>
<p>And now the company will check into a hospital in Redmond for a little grave malpractice.  Take a good look at your loved one.  He will only return in a box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/08/asleep-at-the-wheel-the-yahoo-board/#comment-860682</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 17:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11445#comment-860682</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Source: Wall Street Journal&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;At least it makes for good stories for the next 12 months!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Source: Wall Street Journal</p>
<p>At least it makes for good stories for the next 12 months!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/08/asleep-at-the-wheel-the-yahoo-board/#comment-860681</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 17:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11445#comment-860681</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Now, this is where the Board has screwed up...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Yahoo Board to Reject Microsoft Bid
By Matthew Karnitschnig
Word Count: 317  &#124;  Companies Featured in This Article: Yahoo, Microsoft, Google&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Yahoo Inc.'s board plans to reject Microsoft Corp.'s unsolicited $44.6 billion offer to acquire the Web giant, a person familiar with the situation says.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;After a series of meetings over the past week, Yahoo's board determined that the $31 per share offer "massively undervalues" Yahoo, the person said. It also doesn't account for the risks Yahoo would be taking by entering into an agreement ...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Forgive me OM, you may have been correct, if this is another indication of stupidity at it's finest.  I see no better future for Yahoo! than to take MS's offer.  As Cramer says, "who do these Yahoo! guys think they are?"  Really, their business is going to pot and they think they have more value?  They are losing value every day they stay in business.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now, this is where the Board has screwed up&#8230;</p>
<p>Yahoo Board to Reject Microsoft Bid<br />
By Matthew Karnitschnig<br />
Word Count: 317  |  Companies Featured in This Article: Yahoo, Microsoft, Google</p>
<p>Yahoo Inc.&#8217;s board plans to reject Microsoft Corp.&#8217;s unsolicited $44.6 billion offer to acquire the Web giant, a person familiar with the situation says.</p>
<p>After a series of meetings over the past week, Yahoo&#8217;s board determined that the $31 per share offer &#8220;massively undervalues&#8221; Yahoo, the person said. It also doesn&#8217;t account for the risks Yahoo would be taking by entering into an agreement &#8230;</p>
<p>Forgive me OM, you may have been correct, if this is another indication of stupidity at it&#8217;s finest.  I see no better future for Yahoo! than to take MS&#8217;s offer.  As Cramer says, &#8220;who do these Yahoo! guys think they are?&#8221;  Really, their business is going to pot and they think they have more value?  They are losing value every day they stay in business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/08/asleep-at-the-wheel-the-yahoo-board/#comment-860671</link>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 14:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11445#comment-860671</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@ Jesse K,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;SO perhaps we should do away with the shsm called a board of directors, get rid of the bloat and stop wasting money.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Why spend millions of ddollars on the rubber stamps and friends of the CEO?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Jesse K,</p>
<p>SO perhaps we should do away with the shsm called a board of directors, get rid of the bloat and stop wasting money.</p>
<p>Why spend millions of ddollars on the rubber stamps and friends of the CEO?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/08/asleep-at-the-wheel-the-yahoo-board/#comment-860670</link>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 14:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11445#comment-860670</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@ Dave Winer,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the long comment. You are right to point out that we don't comment often enough about things that are going wrong, or the insanity that is starting to grip the valley.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I agree, that we all, including myself have been guilty of saying nothing, lest we hurt someone's feelings but that isn't really a good thing.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Dave Winer,</p>
<p>Thanks for the long comment. You are right to point out that we don&#8217;t comment often enough about things that are going wrong, or the insanity that is starting to grip the valley.</p>
<p>I agree, that we all, including myself have been guilty of saying nothing, lest we hurt someone&#8217;s feelings but that isn&#8217;t really a good thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
