<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One Antenna to Rule Them All</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/02/04/one-antenna-to-rule-them-all/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/04/one-antenna-to-rule-them-all/</link>
	<description>Tracking the Internet Evolution</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 11:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shah Ullah</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/04/one-antenna-to-rule-them-all/#comment-862468</link>
		<dc:creator>Shah Ullah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 03:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11396#comment-862468</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Is there a way to create firmware for a multi-band/multi-antennae short-haul wireless chip that receives instructions and creates a protocol for communication on the fly? Something that can communicate under the guidelines of WiFi, Bluetooth, UWB, WirelessHD, whatever but the specs are not set in stone with some pre-existing standard? What if the applications that use the chip were to give a set of instructions to the chip on the fly and the chip would then use its multi-band/multi-antennae functionality to figure out how to best send/receive data depending on the short-haul application/bandwidth-intensity, etc. With a second layer of software, that may cause the chip to run up battery.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a way to create firmware for a multi-band/multi-antennae short-haul wireless chip that receives instructions and creates a protocol for communication on the fly? Something that can communicate under the guidelines of WiFi, Bluetooth, UWB, WirelessHD, whatever but the specs are not set in stone with some pre-existing standard? What if the applications that use the chip were to give a set of instructions to the chip on the fly and the chip would then use its multi-band/multi-antennae functionality to figure out how to best send/receive data depending on the short-haul application/bandwidth-intensity, etc. With a second layer of software, that may cause the chip to run up battery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 60 GHz=60-Second HD Movie Downloads - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/04/one-antenna-to-rule-them-all/#comment-862387</link>
		<dc:creator>60 GHz=60-Second HD Movie Downloads - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 19:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11396#comment-862387</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] from televisions to DVD players to camcorders, expect a CMOS innovation or a breakthrough in antennas.     Share/Send  Sphere  Print  Previous [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from televisions to DVD players to camcorders, expect a CMOS innovation or a breakthrough in antennas.     Share/Send  Sphere  Print  Previous [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Law of Mobility &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Enabling Technology: Week of 2^3=8</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/04/one-antenna-to-rule-them-all/#comment-860528</link>
		<dc:creator>The Law of Mobility &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Enabling Technology: Week of 2^3=8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 12:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11396#comment-860528</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] iMAT [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] iMAT [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Skycross single antenna can handle multiple frequencies - PMP Today</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/04/one-antenna-to-rule-them-all/#comment-859953</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Skycross single antenna can handle multiple frequencies - PMP Today</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 05:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11396#comment-859953</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] [via gigaom] [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [via gigaom] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unlimited wireless services from a single antenna? Maybe &#124;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/04/one-antenna-to-rule-them-all/#comment-859938</link>
		<dc:creator>Unlimited wireless services from a single antenna? Maybe &#124;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 01:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11396#comment-859938</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] February 4, 2008Unlimited wireless services from a single antenna? Maybe  Quite possibly, but right now 4 is considered a breakthrough if it works. Even if the transmission is digital, radio waves themselves are by nature analog, and efficient antennas are dimensionally tuned to the wavelength of the signal. Enable a bunch of wavelengths in a single device and you consume a bunch of space with antennas, until now. At the heart of all wireless communications lies an antenna, or in the case of today’s mobile phones and laptops that need to receive Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, EVDO, WiMax or DVB-H, sometimes two or three. Packing each of these antennas into a small form factor is expensive and can cause interference problems, so when I saw that SkyCross, an antenna company in Viera, Fla., had managed to receive several signals on one antenna, I thought that was pretty sweet. (from GigaOm) [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] February 4, 2008Unlimited wireless services from a single antenna? Maybe  Quite possibly, but right now 4 is considered a breakthrough if it works. Even if the transmission is digital, radio waves themselves are by nature analog, and efficient antennas are dimensionally tuned to the wavelength of the signal. Enable a bunch of wavelengths in a single device and you consume a bunch of space with antennas, until now. At the heart of all wireless communications lies an antenna, or in the case of today’s mobile phones and laptops that need to receive Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, EVDO, WiMax or DVB-H, sometimes two or three. Packing each of these antennas into a small form factor is expensive and can cause interference problems, so when I saw that SkyCross, an antenna company in Viera, Fla., had managed to receive several signals on one antenna, I thought that was pretty sweet. (from GigaOm) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kopelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/04/one-antenna-to-rule-them-all/#comment-859909</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Kopelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 21:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11396#comment-859909</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Alan, if you were to take those outdoor multiband antennae apart, you would notice that underneath the radome is actually multiple discrete antennae, not a single multiband antenna.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan, if you were to take those outdoor multiband antennae apart, you would notice that underneath the radome is actually multiple discrete antennae, not a single multiband antenna.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Wilensky</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/04/one-antenna-to-rule-them-all/#comment-859882</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Wilensky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 18:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11396#comment-859882</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It's funny: mutliband antennas are all over the place in mobile commercial applications, commercial rooftop sites (Duplexors and triplexors), multi band di-poles and tripoles, etc.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What took 'em so long to get the three bands into a compact embedded consumer application?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s funny: mutliband antennas are all over the place in mobile commercial applications, commercial rooftop sites (Duplexors and triplexors), multi band di-poles and tripoles, etc.</p>
<p>What took &#8216;em so long to get the three bands into a compact embedded consumer application?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
