<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Responds to MicroHOO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/02/03/google-responds-to-microhoo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/03/google-responds-to-microhoo/</link>
	<description>Tracking the Internet Evolution</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 07:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Free Traffic - MicroHoo</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/03/google-responds-to-microhoo/#comment-872142</link>
		<dc:creator>Free Traffic - MicroHoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 04:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/02/03/google-responds-to-microhoo/#comment-872142</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Goog le Response to MicroHoo is to Worry... that's the only thing 
they can do right now. Nothing could stop Behemoth Microsoft to 
stand on their way.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goog le Response to MicroHoo is to Worry&#8230; that&#8217;s the only thing<br />
they can do right now. Nothing could stop Behemoth Microsoft to<br />
stand on their way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Monopoly</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/03/google-responds-to-microhoo/#comment-861919</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Monopoly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 04:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/02/03/google-responds-to-microhoo/#comment-861919</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] much chance of them blocking the deal as it stands. Many are suspecting this is just Google’s way to get back at Microsoft for slowing down their own DoubleClick acquisition, but could it be a carefully thought out [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] much chance of them blocking the deal as it stands. Many are suspecting this is just Google’s way to get back at Microsoft for slowing down their own DoubleClick acquisition, but could it be a carefully thought out [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SCOGOSTOLOGY.COM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/03/google-responds-to-microhoo/#comment-860028</link>
		<dc:creator>SCOGOSTOLOGY.COM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 15:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/02/03/google-responds-to-microhoo/#comment-860028</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;At last, the unthinkable has happened. The sky has fallen down and the world is ending! Yahoo is being acquired by the 500Ib Redmond beast. Who in a million years would ever think that this day will ever come?  I remember  many years ago about using an excellent  service called hotmail.com. It was the best e-mail service. But as soon as the 500Ib gorilla acquired it, that service went down the toilet and became a joke. Then there was WebTV. Where is it? WebT what? Now, Yahoo? May God help us, because in 5 yrs it may be Google's turn to go to bed with the beast. I prefer that the Beast acquire Google now so it can de-construct it and lay it to waste as quickly as possible. Please leave Yahoo alone!!! I don't think by acquiring Yahoo, the beast can make any improvement in its competition with the Googledontbevilbutbevilanyway.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At last, the unthinkable has happened. The sky has fallen down and the world is ending! Yahoo is being acquired by the 500Ib Redmond beast. Who in a million years would ever think that this day will ever come?  I remember  many years ago about using an excellent  service called hotmail.com. It was the best e-mail service. But as soon as the 500Ib gorilla acquired it, that service went down the toilet and became a joke. Then there was WebTV. Where is it? WebT what? Now, Yahoo? May God help us, because in 5 yrs it may be Google&#8217;s turn to go to bed with the beast. I prefer that the Beast acquire Google now so it can de-construct it and lay it to waste as quickly as possible. Please leave Yahoo alone!!! I don&#8217;t think by acquiring Yahoo, the beast can make any improvement in its competition with the Googledontbevilbutbevilanyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/03/google-responds-to-microhoo/#comment-859956</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 06:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/02/03/google-responds-to-microhoo/#comment-859956</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;and what about the new stock symbol: "MHOO" ?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and what about the new stock symbol: &#8220;MHOO&#8221; ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/03/google-responds-to-microhoo/#comment-859955</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 06:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/02/03/google-responds-to-microhoo/#comment-859955</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;"Miahoo", that sounds right&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Miahoo&#8221;, that sounds right</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler Bolender</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/03/google-responds-to-microhoo/#comment-859867</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler Bolender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 18:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/02/03/google-responds-to-microhoo/#comment-859867</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Disappointing to see this from a person and organization that I hold in such high esteem.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It is intellectually insulting to read his argument; David is right- there are anti- trust issues- but they all concern advertising aggregation. But as that is a hard argument to articulate, he regrettably shifts the debate to anti-trust for consumers (and talks abut IM? Really?) because that is tangible to readers of the blog. Ludicrous argument.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Disappointing to see this from a person and organization that I hold in such high esteem.</p>
<p>It is intellectually insulting to read his argument; David is right- there are anti- trust issues- but they all concern advertising aggregation. But as that is a hard argument to articulate, he regrettably shifts the debate to anti-trust for consumers (and talks abut IM? Really?) because that is tangible to readers of the blog. Ludicrous argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rohit</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/03/google-responds-to-microhoo/#comment-859850</link>
		<dc:creator>rohit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 17:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/02/03/google-responds-to-microhoo/#comment-859850</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;heads: msft+yhoo goes through, goog wins as users migrate over and new users continue to accumulate their way and feed their monetization engines.  tails: msft+yhoo has issues, stretches out for months, goog wins as users migrate over.  if i was goog, why wouldn't i launch a few barbs here and there while yhoo contemplates the offer at hand.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heads: msft+yhoo goes through, goog wins as users migrate over and new users continue to accumulate their way and feed their monetization engines.  tails: msft+yhoo has issues, stretches out for months, goog wins as users migrate over.  if i was goog, why wouldn&#8217;t i launch a few barbs here and there while yhoo contemplates the offer at hand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A.T.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/03/google-responds-to-microhoo/#comment-859846</link>
		<dc:creator>A.T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 17:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/02/03/google-responds-to-microhoo/#comment-859846</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Pushing rods into wheels is such an old tactics - if it makes sense for business, if it is legal 100% then why not? And those who doesn't like it - when was the last time you were talking to your legislator, huh?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pushing rods into wheels is such an old tactics - if it makes sense for business, if it is legal 100% then why not? And those who doesn&#8217;t like it - when was the last time you were talking to your legislator, huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose Miguel Cansado</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/03/google-responds-to-microhoo/#comment-859838</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose Miguel Cansado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 16:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/02/03/google-responds-to-microhoo/#comment-859838</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Google should better attack Microsoft where it hurts, and launch Google Linux (why not Goobuntu) to hit hard on Windows and Office that brings billions in profits to Microsoft.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://tech-talk.biz/2008/02/04/the-best-defense-is-attack-goobuntu/&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google should better attack Microsoft where it hurts, and launch Google Linux (why not Goobuntu) to hit hard on Windows and Office that brings billions in profits to Microsoft.</p>
<p> (<a href="http://tech-talk.biz/2008/02/04/the-best-defense-is-attack-goobuntu/" rel="nofollow">link</a>) </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BizThoughts - Is Google Afraid of Microhoo (or Yahsoft)? - Business and Entrepreneurial Thoughts from Mike Lee</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/03/google-responds-to-microhoo/#comment-859831</link>
		<dc:creator>BizThoughts - Is Google Afraid of Microhoo (or Yahsoft)? - Business and Entrepreneurial Thoughts from Mike Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 16:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/02/03/google-responds-to-microhoo/#comment-859831</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] &#34;Does anyone else see this as Google playing tit-for-tat?&#34; [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#34;Does anyone else see this as Google playing tit-for-tat?&#34; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Some thoughts on Microsoft/Yahoo</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/03/google-responds-to-microhoo/#comment-859823</link>
		<dc:creator>Some thoughts on Microsoft/Yahoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 15:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/02/03/google-responds-to-microhoo/#comment-859823</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] - my view of what a joint MSFT/YHOO company might be called. Sure you&#8217;ve seen Yacrosoft and MicroHOO. These all give far too much equivalence in this relationship. The reality would be much more like [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] - my view of what a joint MSFT/YHOO company might be called. Sure you&#8217;ve seen Yacrosoft and MicroHOO. These all give far too much equivalence in this relationship. The reality would be much more like [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Googling Google mobile edition</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/03/google-responds-to-microhoo/#comment-859818</link>
		<dc:creator>Googling Google mobile edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 14:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/02/03/google-responds-to-microhoo/#comment-859818</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] blocking the deal as it stands. Many people are thinking that this is simply Google&#8217;s way to get back at Microsoft for slowing down their own DoubleClick acquisition, but could it be a carefully thought out [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] blocking the deal as it stands. Many people are thinking that this is simply Google&#8217;s way to get back at Microsoft for slowing down their own DoubleClick acquisition, but could it be a carefully thought out [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Watching Intently</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/03/google-responds-to-microhoo/#comment-859814</link>
		<dc:creator>Watching Intently</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 13:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/02/03/google-responds-to-microhoo/#comment-859814</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Microsoft must see a world of hurt coming their way if they're trying to spend tens of billions of dollars to change from an OS/on-PC-applications company to a Web-based company, huh?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft must see a world of hurt coming their way if they&#8217;re trying to spend tens of billions of dollars to change from an OS/on-PC-applications company to a Web-based company, huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: free market research company</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/03/google-responds-to-microhoo/#comment-859800</link>
		<dc:creator>free market research company</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 10:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/02/03/google-responds-to-microhoo/#comment-859800</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Same old story - the only revelation is - goolge - who has now become part of this corporate war.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same old story - the only revelation is - goolge - who has now become part of this corporate war.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raindeer</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/03/google-responds-to-microhoo/#comment-859783</link>
		<dc:creator>Raindeer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 08:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/02/03/google-responds-to-microhoo/#comment-859783</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;That's the way it goes. Jacking up the lawyer fees. Though MicroHOO will find itself not in as much trouble in the EU. Since Yahoo is only small potatoes in the EU.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But the HR department of Google will have to work overtime today receiving all those resume's of Yahoo's developers. Can you imagine having to listen to Ballmer shouting DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s the way it goes. Jacking up the lawyer fees. Though MicroHOO will find itself not in as much trouble in the EU. Since Yahoo is only small potatoes in the EU.</p>
<p>But the HR department of Google will have to work overtime today receiving all those resume&#8217;s of Yahoo&#8217;s developers. Can you imagine having to listen to Ballmer shouting DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Responds to Microsoft-Yahoo Deal - Technozzle</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/03/google-responds-to-microhoo/#comment-859772</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Responds to Microsoft-Yahoo Deal - Technozzle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 05:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/02/03/google-responds-to-microhoo/#comment-859772</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Coverage on TechCrunch, GigaOM, BuzzMachine, Read Write Web, Business Week, Mashable, VentureBeat and Between The Lines.  [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Coverage on TechCrunch, GigaOM, BuzzMachine, Read Write Web, Business Week, Mashable, VentureBeat and Between The Lines.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
