<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dear Yahoo, I Pwn You. XO Microsoft.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/02/01/dear-yahoo-i-pwn-you-xo-microsoft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/01/dear-yahoo-i-pwn-you-xo-microsoft/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:43:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Maybe Yahoo Was Destined to Flounder</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/01/dear-yahoo-i-pwn-you-xo-microsoft/#comment-923121</link>
		<dc:creator>Maybe Yahoo Was Destined to Flounder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 00:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11365#comment-923121</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] milestone date lies a little further ahead: Feb. 1, the one-year anniversary of Microsoft’s proposed acquisition of Yahoo, an event that set the Internet giant into a maelstrom of turmoil no company would ever willingly [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] milestone date lies a little further ahead: Feb. 1, the one-year anniversary of Microsoft’s proposed acquisition of Yahoo, an event that set the Internet giant into a maelstrom of turmoil no company would ever willingly [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mithras Capital&#8211;Who Are these Yahoos? - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/01/dear-yahoo-i-pwn-you-xo-microsoft/#comment-904001</link>
		<dc:creator>Mithras Capital&#8211;Who Are these Yahoos? - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11365#comment-904001</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] like to revisit what they know, and what could be more familiar than the ever-present effort to get Microsoft and Yahoo together at last? Mithras Capital Partners has floated a proposal that Microsoft buy Yahoo for $22 a share, [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] like to revisit what they know, and what could be more familiar than the ever-present effort to get Microsoft and Yahoo together at last? Mithras Capital Partners has floated a proposal that Microsoft buy Yahoo for $22 a share, [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Memo to Jerry, Steve and Carl: Just Do It! - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/01/dear-yahoo-i-pwn-you-xo-microsoft/#comment-888955</link>
		<dc:creator>Memo to Jerry, Steve and Carl: Just Do It! - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11365#comment-888955</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] the ins and outs of the wheeling and dealing, the audience outside the tech world is yawning. This started back in February (2007 if you believe the original offer from Microsoft). Let&#8217;s finish this, so the world can [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the ins and outs of the wheeling and dealing, the audience outside the tech world is yawning. This started back in February (2007 if you believe the original offer from Microsoft). Let&#8217;s finish this, so the world can [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft, Yahoo Back On, Or Not - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/01/dear-yahoo-i-pwn-you-xo-microsoft/#comment-878928</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft, Yahoo Back On, Or Not - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 03:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11365#comment-878928</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] As you might remember, Microsoft made a $31 a share bid for Yahoo, got spurned, and then raised the bid to $34 a share, only to see it [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As you might remember, Microsoft made a $31 a share bid for Yahoo, got spurned, and then raised the bid to $34 a share, only to see it [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OpenID Has Big New Friends - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/01/dear-yahoo-i-pwn-you-xo-microsoft/#comment-864346</link>
		<dc:creator>OpenID Has Big New Friends - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 02:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11365#comment-864346</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Luke Sontag last night. He was outspoken, as usual, on the virtues of OpenID, but also on how Microsoft&#8217;s bid for Yahoo makes today&#8217;s development even richer for [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Luke Sontag last night. He was outspoken, as usual, on the virtues of OpenID, but also on how Microsoft&#8217;s bid for Yahoo makes today&#8217;s development even richer for [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 微软雅虎收购案媒体及学者观点一览</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/01/dear-yahoo-i-pwn-you-xo-microsoft/#comment-863058</link>
		<dc:creator>微软雅虎收购案媒体及学者观点一览</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 06:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11365#comment-863058</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] GigaOm的Kevin Kelleher对微软收购雅虎的一些有趣评论“尊敬的雅虎，我赢了，拥抱亲吻微软吧！” [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] GigaOm的Kevin Kelleher对微软收购雅虎的一些有趣评论“尊敬的雅虎，我赢了，拥抱亲吻微软吧！” [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who Will Control Advertising on the Web? - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/01/dear-yahoo-i-pwn-you-xo-microsoft/#comment-860025</link>
		<dc:creator>Who Will Control Advertising on the Web? - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 15:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11365#comment-860025</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] web. The anticipated $80 million in online ad spending cited by Microsoft as the rationale behind its bid for Yahoo is a big number, but how that spending will be apportioned isn&#8217;t [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] web. The anticipated $80 million in online ad spending cited by Microsoft as the rationale behind its bid for Yahoo is a big number, but how that spending will be apportioned isn&#8217;t [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paramvir  Singh</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/01/dear-yahoo-i-pwn-you-xo-microsoft/#comment-859810</link>
		<dc:creator>Paramvir  Singh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 12:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11365#comment-859810</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ok. So now I have to giveup my yahoo accoint as well. 
i have been using hotmail since before msft fckd it. Then I moved to Google. And thank god for it.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok. So now I have to giveup my yahoo accoint as well. 
i have been using hotmail since before msft fckd it. Then I moved to Google. And thank god for it.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parul Bindra</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/01/dear-yahoo-i-pwn-you-xo-microsoft/#comment-859539</link>
		<dc:creator>Parul Bindra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 08:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11365#comment-859539</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think it’s a good news for bloggers because if it becomes a success then he will no more have to face monopoly of Google; I mean in the field of Google search engine and it’s advertising network, what say?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I believe that the combination of both the companies will deliver superior values of services to the bloggers as it has compete Google. They may come up with attractive Advertising publisher network so, the blogger is no more solely dependent on Google Adsense for his income.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Let us hope that it provides better choice and innovation for us and become a big success!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Parul Bindra
www.bhopu.com- Web 2.0 blogs&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it’s a good news for bloggers because if it becomes a success then he will no more have to face monopoly of Google; I mean in the field of Google search engine and it’s advertising network, what say?</p>

<p>I believe that the combination of both the companies will deliver superior values of services to the bloggers as it has compete Google. They may come up with attractive Advertising publisher network so, the blogger is no more solely dependent on Google Adsense for his income.</p>

<p>Let us hope that it provides better choice and innovation for us and become a big success!</p>

<p>Parul Bindra
<a href="http://www.bhopu.com-" rel="nofollow">http://www.bhopu.com-</a> Web 2.0 blogs</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Wilensky</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/01/dear-yahoo-i-pwn-you-xo-microsoft/#comment-859452</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Wilensky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 07:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11365#comment-859452</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;After thinking it over for the day, I can see only one thing that Microsoft brings to the table that might benefit Yahoo - discipline.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If MS can really step back and truly give the enlightened technologists at Yahoo a fair hearing for all the great work that has gone unnoticed by their current employer (Yahoo), and bring a modicum of business and integration rigor to the combined properties, then maybe there can be good from the buyout.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That sentence was bad. But you get it, it&#039;s late.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After thinking it over for the day, I can see only one thing that Microsoft brings to the table that might benefit Yahoo &#8211; discipline.</p>

<p>If MS can really step back and truly give the enlightened technologists at Yahoo a fair hearing for all the great work that has gone unnoticed by their current employer (Yahoo), and bring a modicum of business and integration rigor to the combined properties, then maybe there can be good from the buyout.</p>

<p>That sentence was bad. But you get it, it&#8217;s late.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/01/dear-yahoo-i-pwn-you-xo-microsoft/#comment-859420</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 04:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11365#comment-859420</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Microsoft announces new Flickr pricing :(&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Say goodbye to Flickr Pro. Say hello to Flickr Home Basic, Home Premium, Business, Enterprise and Ultimate. Pricing is TBD ;)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft announces new Flickr pricing :(</p>

<p>Say goodbye to Flickr Pro. Say hello to Flickr Home Basic, Home Premium, Business, Enterprise and Ultimate. Pricing is TBD ;)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shan Sinha</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/01/dear-yahoo-i-pwn-you-xo-microsoft/#comment-859419</link>
		<dc:creator>Shan Sinha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 04:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11365#comment-859419</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Great posts and great video clips :)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But I&#039;ll admit, Om, I think you&#039;re running away from the core issue here.  Microsoft is acquiring yahoo for the potential search combination and almost more importantly for the traffic aggregation benefit.  The real underlying benefit is to build a much greater platform for advertisers.  Assuming they can build an integrated advertising platform + publisher network (a la aQuantive), which is a big assumption, the benefit to fold brands into the same umbrella just doesn&#039;t matter.  Now the MSN brand may go, only because Microsoft was creating confusion on its own long before Yahoo entered the picture (what with Windows Live, Office Live and MSN).  But other than that, there&#039;s not tangible reason by Microsoft needs to integrate the user experiences other than for the sole reason of being able to offer an integrated publishing experience to advertisers across MSFT / YHOO joint properties.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The focus here is to give advertisers a choice: spend on paid search or display dollars or some combination of both.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For paid search, let&#039;s take it to google, but maybe for certain audiences, MicroHoo makes sense.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For display ads.. Goog definitely doesn&#039;t make sense.  Let&#039;s go with MicroHoo.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If I have to decide between using paid search or display, well.. there&#039;s an argument to be made for going with display on joint MSFT / YHOO properties  vs going with paid Goog just because of the scale.... when there wasn&#039;t even a question of which way I would go if MSFT &amp; YHOO were separate...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This isn&#039;t about the consumers.. it&#039;s about the sheer scale of numbers for advertisers..&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great posts and great video clips :)</p>

<p>But I&#8217;ll admit, Om, I think you&#8217;re running away from the core issue here.  Microsoft is acquiring yahoo for the potential search combination and almost more importantly for the traffic aggregation benefit.  The real underlying benefit is to build a much greater platform for advertisers.  Assuming they can build an integrated advertising platform + publisher network (a la aQuantive), which is a big assumption, the benefit to fold brands into the same umbrella just doesn&#8217;t matter.  Now the MSN brand may go, only because Microsoft was creating confusion on its own long before Yahoo entered the picture (what with Windows Live, Office Live and MSN).  But other than that, there&#8217;s not tangible reason by Microsoft needs to integrate the user experiences other than for the sole reason of being able to offer an integrated publishing experience to advertisers across MSFT / YHOO joint properties.</p>

<p>The focus here is to give advertisers a choice: spend on paid search or display dollars or some combination of both.</p>

<p>For paid search, let&#8217;s take it to google, but maybe for certain audiences, MicroHoo makes sense.</p>

<p>For display ads.. Goog definitely doesn&#8217;t make sense.  Let&#8217;s go with MicroHoo.</p>

<p>If I have to decide between using paid search or display, well.. there&#8217;s an argument to be made for going with display on joint MSFT / YHOO properties  vs going with paid Goog just because of the scale&#8230;. when there wasn&#8217;t even a question of which way I would go if MSFT &amp; YHOO were separate&#8230;</p>

<p>This isn&#8217;t about the consumers.. it&#8217;s about the sheer scale of numbers for advertisers..</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NasMobile</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/01/dear-yahoo-i-pwn-you-xo-microsoft/#comment-859399</link>
		<dc:creator>NasMobile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 00:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11365#comment-859399</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Microsoft and Yahoo are #87 &amp; #87 on the Fortune 100 Best Companies to Work For http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/bestcompanies/2008/full_list/index.html.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Google is #1.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Purely from an employee perspective, both companies have a long way to go before they can take on the might of Google.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;How can a combined company get such allegiance from employees that will take the battle to Google.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is the key question - ultimately it will be the employees that will execute and implement a war stategy. Are they up for a fight?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft and Yahoo are #87 &amp; #87 on the Fortune 100 Best Companies to Work For <a href="http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/bestcompanies/2008/full_list/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/bestcompanies/2008/full_list/index.html</a>.</p>

<p>Google is #1.</p>

<p>Purely from an employee perspective, both companies have a long way to go before they can take on the might of Google.</p>

<p>How can a combined company get such allegiance from employees that will take the battle to Google.</p>

<p>This is the key question &#8211; ultimately it will be the employees that will execute and implement a war stategy. Are they up for a fight?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Panton</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/01/dear-yahoo-i-pwn-you-xo-microsoft/#comment-859380</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Panton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 22:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11365#comment-859380</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Lost in the sidelines of this, MSFT would get to own the only viable
competition for Exchange, ie Zimbra. Ouch, tough if you were a small ISP
wanting to offer advanced services without paying the M$ tax.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lost in the sidelines of this, MSFT would get to own the only viable
competition for Exchange, ie Zimbra. Ouch, tough if you were a small ISP
wanting to offer advanced services without paying the M$ tax.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Worker Daily &#187; Archive WWD Debate: Microsoft Wants Yahoo, What do Web Workers Get? &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/01/dear-yahoo-i-pwn-you-xo-microsoft/#comment-859376</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Worker Daily &#187; Archive WWD Debate: Microsoft Wants Yahoo, What do Web Workers Get? &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 22:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11365#comment-859376</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Dear Yahoo, I Pwn You. XO Microsoft. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dear Yahoo, I Pwn You. XO Microsoft. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Rosenberg&#8217;s Wordyard &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Microsoft plus Yahoo? The sum is less than the parts</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/02/01/dear-yahoo-i-pwn-you-xo-microsoft/#comment-859375</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Rosenberg&#8217;s Wordyard &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Microsoft plus Yahoo? The sum is less than the parts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11365#comment-859375</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Kevin Kelleher has an amusing take over at GigaOm: [Ballmer] finally called Yahoo on the Oz-like illusion it’s been fostering for a [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Kevin Kelleher has an amusing take over at GigaOm: [Ballmer] finally called Yahoo on the Oz-like illusion it’s been fostering for a [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
