Even if you’ve followed the ballooning costs of the clean coal project FutureGen over the past few years, the news out this week that the Bush Administration has basically cut its support for the project is still a shocker. The DOE issued a press release saying […]

Even if you’ve followed the ballooning costs of the clean coal project FutureGen over the past few years, the news out this week that the Bush Administration has basically cut its support for the project is still a shocker. The DOE issued a press release saying the project had been “restructured” but the Wall Street Journal gives it the space it deserves, calling it “a major policy reversal,” that could “kill the project by shifting most of the cost to an industry consortium.”

The move is a blow to coal producers and coal-burning utilities that wanted to prove the technology, the WSJ notes, but more than anything it is a major upset for the viability of clean coal technology. The FutureGen project was the great green hope of the coal industry — a proof-of-concept project that, had it been successful, could have facilitated the use of private funds for the further development and construction of clean coal plants. Now, clean coal is very much back in limbo, with no proof the technology is anywhere near viable and no sure timetable to prove that it is.

This policy shift follows right on the heels of President Bush’s last State of the Union Address. His Energy Secretary’s deep-sixing of FutureGen does not seem to be in line with his recently restated agenda to “fund new technologies that can generate coal power while capturing carbon emissions.”

Meanwhile, all of presidential hopefuls say they will pursue clean coal research, but with the derailment of FutureGen it is extremely unlikely that clean coal will become a reality during the next administration. In fact, it might not even happen by the end of three presidential terms. James Hansen, one of the world’s best-known global warming researchers and a recent vocal advocate of proposed coal plants, has said that clean coal technology is at least a decade away:

It is really too bad that the DOE has taken so long to get its demonstration plant going. They said in 2001, they would make this FutureGen, and its taken them several years just to decide where to do it. It looks like it will take several more years. So the practical matter is, given where we are right now, it [clean coal in full-scale operation] could still be a decade away.

America needs its cheap energy, and cleaning up dirty coal seemed like a great way to keep the lights on while using American coal. On the global scale, American clean coal technology had the potential to be a valuable export as China, who is bringing online roughly one coal-fired power plant every week, tries to clean up its air. Now it falls to startups like GreatPoint Energy to prove to skeptical environmentalists and increasingly desperate coal magnates that the potentially oxymoronic pipe dream of “clean coal” can come true.

This post was co-written by Craig Rubens.

You’re subscribed! If you like, you can update your settings

  1. Will Canada Save Clean Coal? « Earth2Tech Friday, February 1, 2008

    [...] Comments Posted February 1st, 2008 at 11:03 am in Policy With the Department of Energy’s decision to back off of the FutureGen project, the future of clean coal as a viable technology was looking smoky. Today, the skies cleared a bit, [...]

  2. Cleantech Guide to Super Tuesday « Earth2Tech Wednesday, February 6, 2008

    [...] Coal: While the current administration cut funding for FutureGen, a planned facility using clean coal technology, most of the candidates support some kind of [...]

  3. Tech to Capture & Store Carbon Inches Forward « Earth2Tech Monday, February 25, 2008

    [...] success of CCS but research thus far has proven to more expensive and far slower than expected. The now scuttled FutureGen Project took so long and was so costly the government ended up pulling its funding. And experts like James [...]

  4. Everyone Agrees, Carbon Capture & Storage Ain’t Easy « Earth2Tech Friday, March 7, 2008

    [...] by Craig Rubens No Comments Posted March 7th, 2008 at 6:41 pm in Big Green With the recent demise of the FutureGen project, and the feds and banks alike distancing themselves from the future risk of carbon intensive coal, [...]

  5. Green energy is definitely the best solution in most cases. Technology like solar energy, wind power, fuel cells, zaps electric vehicles, EV hybrids, etc have come so far recently. Green energy even costs way less than oil and gas in many cases.

  6. DOE Still Throwing Money at Carbon Capture « Earth2Tech Wednesday, May 7, 2008

    [...] a number of smaller, distributed projects to test the capture and storage of carbon following the nixing of the FutureGen project, the Department of Energy has awarded $126.6 million to two regional carbon capture [...]

  7. DOE Revamps Carbon Storage with $1.3B « Earth2Tech Wednesday, June 25, 2008

    [...] No Comments Posted June 25th, 2008 at 1:59 pm in Policy When the U.S. Department of Energy pulled the plug on the FutureGen project, the clean coal industry was left adrift, aimless in the cleantech sea. The DOE said [...]

  8. NY Pulls Plug on $1.5B Clean Coal Plant « Earth2Tech Thursday, July 17, 2008

    [...] getting scuttled and few large-scale test projects scheduled, especially in the U.S. since the cancellation of the DOE’s FutureGen project, there doesn’t seem to be much progress in demonstrating the technology of carbon capture and [...]

  9. DOE Funds Carbon Capture With $340M & Solar $24M, Sigh « Earth2Tech Tuesday, August 12, 2008

    [...] Since 2001 the DOE has put more than $2.5 billion into clean coal, including millions sunk into the scuttled FutureGen project. This week’s $340 million is part of President Bush’s $2 billion, 10-Year Clean Coal [...]

  10. IEA: Carbon Capture Needs $20B — Now « Earth2Tech Monday, October 20, 2008

    [...] set forward by the G8. The U.S. has spent $2.5 billion on clean coal technology since 2001 but scrapped its only large-scale CCS project, citing rising [...]

Comments have been disabled for this post