<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are the Markets Getting Too Heavy for Google to Lift?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/01/31/is-it-getting-heavy-for-google-to-lift/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/31/is-it-getting-heavy-for-google-to-lift/</link>
	<description>Tracking the Internet Evolution</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 11:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dear Yahoo, I Pwn You. XO Microsoft. &#187; Ecommerce Blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/31/is-it-getting-heavy-for-google-to-lift/#comment-859272</link>
		<dc:creator>Dear Yahoo, I Pwn You. XO Microsoft. &#187; Ecommerce Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 16:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11361#comment-859272</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] when you’d think Google’s financial discombobulation would give Yahoo some rest comes this heartfelt bullet from Microsoft. On the PR newswire this [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] when you’d think Google’s financial discombobulation would give Yahoo some rest comes this heartfelt bullet from Microsoft. On the PR newswire this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dear Yahoo, I Pwn You. XO Microsoft. - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/31/is-it-getting-heavy-for-google-to-lift/#comment-859245</link>
		<dc:creator>Dear Yahoo, I Pwn You. XO Microsoft. - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 15:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11361#comment-859245</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Friday, February 1, 2008 at 7:56 AM PT Comments (0)   Just when you’d think Google’s financial discombobulation would give Yahoo some rest comes this heartfelt bullet from Microsoft. On the PR newswire this [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Friday, February 1, 2008 at 7:56 AM PT Comments (0)   Just when you’d think Google’s financial discombobulation would give Yahoo some rest comes this heartfelt bullet from Microsoft. On the PR newswire this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: January 2008, Cruel to Tech Stocks and Video Game Stocks &#124; RyanSpoon.com</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/31/is-it-getting-heavy-for-google-to-lift/#comment-859209</link>
		<dc:creator>January 2008, Cruel to Tech Stocks and Video Game Stocks &#124; RyanSpoon.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 09:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11361#comment-859209</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] capped a very difficult month for big-name tech stocks (Google coverage at Cnet, TechTrader and GigaOm). The volatility of each stock is remarkable considering the short time-frame and that each company [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] capped a very difficult month for big-name tech stocks (Google coverage at Cnet, TechTrader and GigaOm). The volatility of each stock is remarkable considering the short time-frame and that each company [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: klime</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/31/is-it-getting-heavy-for-google-to-lift/#comment-859195</link>
		<dc:creator>klime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 05:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11361#comment-859195</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think people forget or don't know that tech doesn't do well at this phase of the cycle, we are cycling up not running.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think people forget or don&#8217;t know that tech doesn&#8217;t do well at this phase of the cycle, we are cycling up not running.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thefamilyguy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/31/is-it-getting-heavy-for-google-to-lift/#comment-859173</link>
		<dc:creator>thefamilyguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 02:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11361#comment-859173</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think this is the end of GOOG (share price levels) as I see it. An year or two until the economy gets its mojo back to support such lofty valuations and I honestly anticipate that MSFT would have come on pretty strong in these two years in advertising, if not as much in search.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Display advertising is the trump Eric tried to play today too and I think Yahoo and MSFT are attacking this very thing with their aggressive acquisitions(Blue lithium, Right Media and Aquantive respectively) and perhaps also a realization that GOOG is/will be the search leader after all. I see GOOG having a very tough competition to earn display ad dollars -- and it will have 1/3rd the revenue of it at best (even with DCLK acquisition.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is the end of GOOG (share price levels) as I see it. An year or two until the economy gets its mojo back to support such lofty valuations and I honestly anticipate that MSFT would have come on pretty strong in these two years in advertising, if not as much in search.</p>
<p>Display advertising is the trump Eric tried to play today too and I think Yahoo and MSFT are attacking this very thing with their aggressive acquisitions(Blue lithium, Right Media and Aquantive respectively) and perhaps also a realization that GOOG is/will be the search leader after all. I see GOOG having a very tough competition to earn display ad dollars &#8212; and it will have 1/3rd the revenue of it at best (even with DCLK acquisition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
