<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Startups Abandon Moore&#8217;s Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/01/30/startups-abandon-moores-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/30/startups-abandon-moores-law/</link>
	<description>Tracking the Internet Evolution</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: RIP Microprocessor Startups - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/30/startups-abandon-moores-law/#comment-872993</link>
		<dc:creator>RIP Microprocessor Startups - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11330#comment-872993</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Friday, April 25, 2008 at 8:00 AM PT Comments (0)    I&#8217;ve been talking about the enormous amount of cash it takes to create any kind of chip company and expressing doubts about the number of startups we [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Friday, April 25, 2008 at 8:00 AM PT Comments (0)    I&#8217;ve been talking about the enormous amount of cash it takes to create any kind of chip company and expressing doubts about the number of startups we [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VCs Start the Year With a Whimper - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/30/startups-abandon-moores-law/#comment-871890</link>
		<dc:creator>VCs Start the Year With a Whimper - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 05:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11330#comment-871890</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] as optimistic, saying it wasn&#8217;t an area that was good for early-stage investing. Given the expense and technical difficulties that come with designing chips, she&#8217;s probably wise to steer [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as optimistic, saying it wasn&#8217;t an area that was good for early-stage investing. Given the expense and technical difficulties that come with designing chips, she&#8217;s probably wise to steer [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Extreme Makeover: Fab Edition - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/30/startups-abandon-moores-law/#comment-866785</link>
		<dc:creator>Extreme Makeover: Fab Edition - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 13:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11330#comment-866785</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] old, trying to keep the costs associated with fab operations down. We&#8217;ve written about startups trying this same tack. Magnella declines to make big investments in technology at the fab that won&#8217;t pay for [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] old, trying to keep the costs associated with fab operations down. We&#8217;ve written about startups trying this same tack. Magnella declines to make big investments in technology at the fab that won&#8217;t pay for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: To Beat Intel, You Need to be Flush - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/30/startups-abandon-moores-law/#comment-861583</link>
		<dc:creator>To Beat Intel, You Need to be Flush - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 15:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11330#comment-861583</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] a smaller and more energy efficient core. Sweet idea, but to illustrate my point about building leading-edge chips costing some serious cash, Montavlo has raised about $73 million. The money comes from New [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a smaller and more energy efficient core. Sweet idea, but to illustrate my point about building leading-edge chips costing some serious cash, Montavlo has raised about $73 million. The money comes from New [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MEMS the Word - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/30/startups-abandon-moores-law/#comment-860507</link>
		<dc:creator>MEMS the Word - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 08:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11330#comment-860507</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] cheaper to produce MEMS, because they are typically built in older fabs. But manufacturing millions of such [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] cheaper to produce MEMS, because they are typically built in older fabs. But manufacturing millions of such [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Krewell</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/30/startups-abandon-moores-law/#comment-859003</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Krewell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 06:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11330#comment-859003</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Another start-up of note that jumped off the Moore's Law treadmill is Luminary Micro. It's building very low cost ARM microcontrollers using at least N-4 process technology. The chips are small enough that they don't need cutting edge process and the older process is really cheap.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Some start-ups still do compete on the leading edge process, like Raza Micro, P.A. Semi, and Cavium, but the costs of funding those start-ups is very high.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another start-up of note that jumped off the Moore&#8217;s Law treadmill is Luminary Micro. It&#8217;s building very low cost ARM microcontrollers using at least N-4 process technology. The chips are small enough that they don&#8217;t need cutting edge process and the older process is really cheap.</p>
<p>Some start-ups still do compete on the leading edge process, like Raza Micro, P.A. Semi, and Cavium, but the costs of funding those start-ups is very high.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Startupd Abandon Moore&#8217;s Law &#171; nPost Startup Blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/30/startups-abandon-moores-law/#comment-858967</link>
		<dc:creator>Startupd Abandon Moore&#8217;s Law &#171; nPost Startup Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 00:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11330#comment-858967</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Abandon Moore&#8217;s&#160;Law  About time.  Based on this article, it sounds like people are starting to smarten up about potential returns [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Abandon Moore&#8217;s&nbsp;Law  About time.  Based on this article, it sounds like people are starting to smarten up about potential returns [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top Posts &#171; WordPress.com</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/30/startups-abandon-moores-law/#comment-858966</link>
		<dc:creator>Top Posts &#171; WordPress.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 00:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11330#comment-858966</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...]  Startups Abandon Moore&#8217;s Law Producing a cutting-edge chip today is more difficult and more expensive than it&#8217;s ever been. With a foundation [&#8230;] [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Startups Abandon Moore&#8217;s Law Producing a cutting-edge chip today is more difficult and more expensive than it&#8217;s ever been. With a foundation [&#8230;] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Wilensky</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/30/startups-abandon-moores-law/#comment-858940</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Wilensky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 21:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11330#comment-858940</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;For processors, the tech press and analysts all focus on Moore...blah blah double. Blah blah Physics. But if you speak to the new, young minds that are coming up in todays academic research kitchens, the new frontier might not be gate density or Moore at all - it's the architecture.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The CPU industry has been captive to the register, program counter, load/store architecture since...well, the beginning. Any innovations that came later, as alternatives (some actually based in very old ideas), they were swept aside by the juggernaut that was the silicon boom of the 89's and 90's.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Liberating computing from these legacy load/store architectures will require small innovative teams to create new, non-register based systems and the software and systems architecture to match.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Then we shall see how Moore predominates in a world where the sheer number of gates is the controlling performance factor.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Quantum? Maybe, but I see a more conventional, bipolar or MOS based future, just with a new type of program operand and data model.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For processors, the tech press and analysts all focus on Moore&#8230;blah blah double. Blah blah Physics. But if you speak to the new, young minds that are coming up in todays academic research kitchens, the new frontier might not be gate density or Moore at all - it&#8217;s the architecture.</p>
<p>The CPU industry has been captive to the register, program counter, load/store architecture since&#8230;well, the beginning. Any innovations that came later, as alternatives (some actually based in very old ideas), they were swept aside by the juggernaut that was the silicon boom of the 89&#8217;s and 90&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Liberating computing from these legacy load/store architectures will require small innovative teams to create new, non-register based systems and the software and systems architecture to match.</p>
<p>Then we shall see how Moore predominates in a world where the sheer number of gates is the controlling performance factor.</p>
<p>Quantum? Maybe, but I see a more conventional, bipolar or MOS based future, just with a new type of program operand and data model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: prophet</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/30/startups-abandon-moores-law/#comment-858938</link>
		<dc:creator>prophet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11330#comment-858938</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You are right Nima.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right Nima.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: free market research company</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/30/startups-abandon-moores-law/#comment-858934</link>
		<dc:creator>free market research company</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11330#comment-858934</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;electronic industry has one gear and that is reverse regardless of Moore's law&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>electronic industry has one gear and that is reverse regardless of Moore&#8217;s law</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nima Negahban</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/30/startups-abandon-moores-law/#comment-858861</link>
		<dc:creator>Nima Negahban</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 09:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11330#comment-858861</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Being a startup in the electronics industry is grueling.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The best was the line "Ubicom, a 12-year-old startup " .&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;12 years! In most other sectors of technology that is a lifetime.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being a startup in the electronics industry is grueling.</p>
<p>The best was the line &#8220;Ubicom, a 12-year-old startup &#8221; .</p>
<p>12 years! In most other sectors of technology that is a lifetime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
