Comments on: Current's Claims of 'Profitability' Ring False http://gigaom.com/2008/01/29/currents-claims-of-profitability-ring-false/ Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:57:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Ryan http://gigaom.com/2008/01/29/currents-claims-of-profitability-ring-false/#comment-192406 Tue, 29 Jan 2008 23:25:23 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=11332#comment-192406 I live in San Francisco and I just found out about Current and I love watching it. Whether or not they are profitable…I hope they end up doing well and sticking around.

I like the new option I have for news…because the “Mainstream Media” is a domestic enemy of our Constitution.

-RC

]]> By: Gene http://gigaom.com/2008/01/29/currents-claims-of-profitability-ring-false/#comment-192405 Tue, 29 Jan 2008 21:26:13 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=11332#comment-192405 Given the ramp in revenue, it probably likely that they are profitable for the most recent quarter or two.

]]> By: Don Jones http://gigaom.com/2008/01/29/currents-claims-of-profitability-ring-false/#comment-192404 Tue, 29 Jan 2008 20:35:08 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=11332#comment-192404 The company could have turned the profitability corner in Q4 07. Would no doubt make their venture capital supporters happy.

]]> By: Jake http://gigaom.com/2008/01/29/currents-claims-of-profitability-ring-false/#comment-192403 Tue, 29 Jan 2008 20:06:47 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=11332#comment-192403 According to some honest folks who should know, the company is profitable. Apparently, large advertisers are paying top-of-market, for various reasons, even before the network is large enough for coverage from ratings services. The bigger story could be why.

]]>