<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Current&#8217;s Claims of &#8216;Profitability&#8217; Ring False</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/01/29/currents-claims-of-profitability-ring-false/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/29/currents-claims-of-profitability-ring-false/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:58:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/29/currents-claims-of-profitability-ring-false/#comment-858798</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 23:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11332#comment-858798</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I live in San Francisco and I just found out about Current and I love watching it. Whether or not they are profitable...I hope they end up doing well and sticking around.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I like the new option I have for news...because the &quot;Mainstream Media&quot; is a domestic enemy of our Constitution.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;-RC&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live in San Francisco and I just found out about Current and I love watching it. Whether or not they are profitable&#8230;I hope they end up doing well and sticking around.</p>

<p>I like the new option I have for news&#8230;because the &#8220;Mainstream Media&#8221; is a domestic enemy of our Constitution.</p>

<p>-RC</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/29/currents-claims-of-profitability-ring-false/#comment-858786</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 21:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11332#comment-858786</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Given the ramp in revenue, it probably likely that they are profitable for the most recent quarter or two.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the ramp in revenue, it probably likely that they are profitable for the most recent quarter or two.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Jones</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/29/currents-claims-of-profitability-ring-false/#comment-858780</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 20:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11332#comment-858780</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The company could have turned the profitability corner in Q4 07.  Would no doubt make their venture capital supporters happy.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The company could have turned the profitability corner in Q4 07.  Would no doubt make their venture capital supporters happy.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/29/currents-claims-of-profitability-ring-false/#comment-858775</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 20:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=11332#comment-858775</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;According to some honest folks who should know, the company is profitable.  Apparently, large advertisers are paying top-of-market, for various reasons, even before the network is large enough for coverage from ratings services.  The bigger story could be why.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to some honest folks who should know, the company is profitable.  Apparently, large advertisers are paying top-of-market, for various reasons, even before the network is large enough for coverage from ratings services.  The bigger story could be why.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
