7 Comments

Summary:

A Polish coal plant, which will cofire biomass (burn biomass at the same time as coal) to help reduce its emissions by 25 percent compared with the country’s current coal plants, is due to come online in 2009. A major Polish power group, Poludniowy Koncern Energetyczny, […]

A Polish coal plant, which will cofire biomass (burn biomass at the same time as coal) to help reduce its emissions by 25 percent compared with the country’s current coal plants, is due to come online in 2009. A major Polish power group, Poludniowy Koncern Energetyczny, estimates its total cost at €500 million ($735 million).

The power plant, and others like it that combine renewable feedstock with coal, present a new dilemma for green contemplation. The all-investment, all-the-time arm of the green movement believes that we should be throwing money at all viable technologies that could reduce greenhouse gases. So, Vinod Khosla invests up and down the line in ethanol companies because he believes the intermediate steps will help us get to the end goal of second- and third-generation biofuels that are not as bad as corn-based ethanol.

Dropping some biomass into our coal plants, just like ethanol doping our gasoline, will get us a reduction in coal mining and emissions, but raises the question: Will these small steps actually put off the more drastic steps that we’ll need to take to keep our climate on the rails? Or do we need to do something with coal for the next decade, until some type of carbon capture and storage system?

The last president of the American Academy for the Advancement of Science had a brilliant state-of-the-world article adapted from a speech he gave last year in this week’s Science, in which he argued for a truly sustainable approach to the use of land:

We need more studies that combine projected land requirements for food and feed, fiber, biofuels, and infrastructure — rather than pretending that each use can be analyzed separately–and that attempt to reconcile the combined demands with the requirement for enough land covered by intact forests and other native ecosystems to provide the carbon sequestration and other ecosystem services society cannot do without.

Just like with biofuels, we have to ask of biomass for baseload generation: Which feedstock? Where is it grown? How is it grown?

Over at Biopact, a cleantech group lobbying for a green energy pact between Europe and Africa, they run the numbers on one example of a good cofiring feedstock, palm kernel shells grown by Nigerian palm farms. “Palm kernel shells are a waste residue from palm fruit processing; they are easy to ship, don’t need to be densified and can be readily co-fired with coal,” they wrote.

Coal cofired with biomass grown for the purpose might not be a clear winner, but coal burned with waste biomass seems like a pretty good idea. Clearly, technologies like these aren’t going to solve our problems, but by engaging with their design, we can ensure that these intermediate steps are the longest strides possible.

You’re subscribed! If you like, you can update your settings

  1. This is exactly the dilemma of most ethanol-based biofuels, it makes some difference but probably not much overall. (like jumping from the 20th instead of the 36th floor of a building you’re less likely to die, but not much). Much better to work hard at reducing demand through greatly increased efficiency of electrical equipment.

  2. maybe they should actually look at Malaysia as well being one of the biggest producers of Palm Oil products due to the enormous growth of palm trees for this production. Dont know where the wastes goes but certainly a venue to explore

  3. Quit wasting time looking for a magic bullet.

    Every step which reduces dependency on finite resources is a worthwhile step. Each measured introduction of a renewable resource is part and parcel of a long-term solution.

    Sometimes, my peer enviros sound like they learned to analyse history – from Walt Disney. It’s not likely John Wayne will stroll into town with a Winchester rifle and make it all better.

  4. If somebody would only care to understand physics and thermodynamics. E=MC2 predicts the amount of ash you are left with after you pulled out the energy at a miserable 40-45% effeciency. Where is the ash going to go??? Dump it “some place”???

  5. Green energy is definitely the best solution in most cases. Technology like solar energy, wind power, fuel cells, zaps electric vehicles, EV hybrids, etc have come so far recently. Green energy even costs way less than oil and gas in many cases.

  6. How to Get Six Pack Fast Wednesday, April 15, 2009

    I noticed that this is not the first time you write about the topic. Why have you decided to touch it again?

  7. Guntur Setyawan Wednesday, May 20, 2009

    Dear all,

    We are big Indonesian player for Palm Kernel Shells (PKS) since 2005. We are now hold more than 30’000 mts PKS in our stockyard ready for delivery using handymax vessel to Europe buyer. If you might interest kindly pls contact us for further infos.

    Rgds,
    Guntur Setyawan
    M: +62 818 839 841
    E/YM! b370gw@yahoo.com

Comments have been disabled for this post