<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Developers: Verizon Wants You!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/developers-verizon-wants-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/developers-verizon-wants-you/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 23:54:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shai Berger</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/developers-verizon-wants-you/#comment-191751</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shai Berger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 02:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/developers-verizon-wants-you/#comment-191751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;An encouraging sign from Verizon... prob&#039;ly see similar moves from the other big carriers.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Competition continues to heat up and they know they have to find differentiating features to keep subscribers loyal. They also know that the next Twitter isn&#039;t going to come from their internal dev team.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But, if you&#039;re a developer trying to build a business around a mobile app, your best bet is still to make a generic web-based interface and avoid any kind of carrier tie-in. (Or maybe build it on Yahoo&#039;s new Go platform.)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If your thing takes off, and you have significant traffic, then the carriers will pay attention and you can cut a good deal.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But not too much traffic... or they&#039;ll block you :-)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/mobile-phones/tmobile-blocks-minutewatcher-from-tracking-cell-minutes.asp&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://www.centernetworks.com/tmobile-blocks-twitter&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A bit more on this conundrum: http://www.shaiberger.com/?p=39&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An encouraging sign from Verizon&#8230; prob&#8217;ly see similar moves from the other big carriers.</p>
<p>Competition continues to heat up and they know they have to find differentiating features to keep subscribers loyal. They also know that the next Twitter isn&#8217;t going to come from their internal dev team.</p>
<p>But, if you&#8217;re a developer trying to build a business around a mobile app, your best bet is still to make a generic web-based interface and avoid any kind of carrier tie-in. (Or maybe build it on Yahoo&#8217;s new Go platform.)</p>
<p>If your thing takes off, and you have significant traffic, then the carriers will pay attention and you can cut a good deal.</p>
<p>But not too much traffic&#8230; or they&#8217;ll block you :-)</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/mobile-phones/tmobile-blocks-minutewatcher-from-tracking-cell-minutes.asp" rel="nofollow">http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/mobile-phones/tmobile-blocks-minutewatcher-from-tracking-cell-minutes.asp</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.centernetworks.com/tmobile-blocks-twitter" rel="nofollow">http://www.centernetworks.com/tmobile-blocks-twitter</a></p>
<p>A bit more on this conundrum: <a href="http://www.shaiberger.com/?p=39" rel="nofollow">http://www.shaiberger.com/?p=39</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: random geekathon at normalblog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/developers-verizon-wants-you/#comment-191750</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[random geekathon at normalblog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 20:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/developers-verizon-wants-you/#comment-191750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] the openmoko will one day run on Verizon, but frankly I think it&#8217;s too late to [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the openmoko will one day run on Verizon, but frankly I think it&#8217;s too late to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mobilebuzz</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/developers-verizon-wants-you/#comment-191749</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mobilebuzz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 20:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/developers-verizon-wants-you/#comment-191749</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;To add to the mixed message, the conference is for device developers (does this mean OEM&#039;s? - I&#039;m confused). Also, the dialogue seems to be unilateral - according to Verizon&#039;s annoucement Verizon will present its device &quot;standards&quot; (which is contradictory in itself).  Is this another way for saying it will impose its requirements on OEM&#039;s? Where then is the openness part? Maybe I&#039;m just confused.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To add to the mixed message, the conference is for device developers (does this mean OEM&#8217;s? &#8211; I&#8217;m confused). Also, the dialogue seems to be unilateral &#8211; according to Verizon&#8217;s annoucement Verizon will present its device &#8220;standards&#8221; (which is contradictory in itself).  Is this another way for saying it will impose its requirements on OEM&#8217;s? Where then is the openness part? Maybe I&#8217;m just confused.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zoobos</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/developers-verizon-wants-you/#comment-191748</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zoobos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 07:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/developers-verizon-wants-you/#comment-191748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Verizon seems to take a step forward with this, by allowing developers to use their network but I am skeptical just because they will impose so many restrictions that it would make it nearly impossible to take advantage of that offer.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Verizon seems to take a step forward with this, by allowing developers to use their network but I am skeptical just because they will impose so many restrictions that it would make it nearly impossible to take advantage of that offer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SMS Text News &#187; Archives &#187; It&#8217;s too much to ask to make it all work properly, isn&#8217;t it?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/developers-verizon-wants-you/#comment-191747</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SMS Text News &#187; Archives &#187; It&#8217;s too much to ask to make it all work properly, isn&#8217;t it?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 07:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/developers-verizon-wants-you/#comment-191747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Developers: Verizon Wants You! - GigaOM Two months after saying it would open up its network to other devices, Verizon Wireless is inviting [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Developers: Verizon Wants You! &#8211; GigaOM Two months after saying it would open up its network to other devices, Verizon Wireless is inviting [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gates VP</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/developers-verizon-wants-you/#comment-191746</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gates VP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 22:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/developers-verizon-wants-you/#comment-191746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Does Verizon have support for advertising or paid-for products?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Development costs for such a specific can be really prohibitive. If you can&#039;t convert the program to cash reasonably quickly, then you&#039;re not going to get a lot of support.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Look to the rise of the Facebook platform for a sampling of this. The tech-savvy crowd would rather build a Facebook app and plug in some ad support to try and bring in some cash. There&#039;s a limited number of these technically-savvy, highly entrepreneurial people available. If there&#039;s no money available in the platform, it&#039;ll be tough to find killer apps.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Has Verizon at least run a for-money contest for the &quot;best new app&quot;?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does Verizon have support for advertising or paid-for products?</p>
<p>Development costs for such a specific can be really prohibitive. If you can&#8217;t convert the program to cash reasonably quickly, then you&#8217;re not going to get a lot of support.</p>
<p>Look to the rise of the Facebook platform for a sampling of this. The tech-savvy crowd would rather build a Facebook app and plug in some ad support to try and bring in some cash. There&#8217;s a limited number of these technically-savvy, highly entrepreneurial people available. If there&#8217;s no money available in the platform, it&#8217;ll be tough to find killer apps.</p>
<p>Has Verizon at least run a for-money contest for the &#8220;best new app&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Organics Information &#187; Developers: Verizon Wants You!</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/developers-verizon-wants-you/#comment-191745</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[New Organics Information &#187; Developers: Verizon Wants You!]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 20:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/developers-verizon-wants-you/#comment-191745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] GigaOM put an intriguing blog post on Developers: Verizon Wants You! [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] GigaOM put an intriguing blog post on Developers: Verizon Wants You! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
