<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AT&amp;T Says SIM Contract Fiasco a Mistake</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:44:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Donald Noble</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-923917</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald Noble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 16:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-923917</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This is all well and good, IF it works. It sounds like it is hit or miss with people visiting stores and calling. Can anyone produce an email, website or anything concrete from AT&amp;T to back this up?
Don&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is all well and good, IF it works. It sounds like it is hit or miss with people visiting stores and calling. Can anyone produce an email, website or anything concrete from AT&amp;T to back this up?
Don</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Hugo</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-866798</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Hugo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 15:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-866798</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;From looking around it seems that ATT is the only one offering &#039;SIM card only&#039; for $25, ONLY with 2 yrs contract?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;All over Asia one can buy a SIM card only, for as little as $5 with minutes SMART or GLOBE - Philippines -$1.50 without minutes- Cellcom/Malaysia - $10 with minutes - HKTEL/Macau, amongst others (INDIA/SINGAPORE etc) consumers benefit because of healthy competition.  Why are the US carriers allowed to charge 1)high fees and 2)shove contracts on consumers&#039; faces and on top of that 3)charge money when you get incoming phone calls?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From looking around it seems that ATT is the only one offering &#8216;SIM card only&#8217; for $25, ONLY with 2 yrs contract?</p>

<p>All over Asia one can buy a SIM card only, for as little as $5 with minutes SMART or GLOBE &#8211; Philippines -$1.50 without minutes- Cellcom/Malaysia &#8211; $10 with minutes &#8211; HKTEL/Macau, amongst others (INDIA/SINGAPORE etc) consumers benefit because of healthy competition.  Why are the US carriers allowed to charge 1)high fees and 2)shove contracts on consumers&#8217; faces and on top of that 3)charge money when you get incoming phone calls?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-866357</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 23:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-866357</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Just tried this at a store tonight, they said absolutely no way can you get postpaid service without a contract.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just tried this at a store tonight, they said absolutely no way can you get postpaid service without a contract.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-866251</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 14:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-866251</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Correct me if I&#039;m wrong, but does anyone have an actual link to anything by ATT actually saying this?  I keep seeing websites talking about it, but as of now, its all just made up crap.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correct me if I&#8217;m wrong, but does anyone have an actual link to anything by ATT actually saying this?  I keep seeing websites talking about it, but as of now, its all just made up crap.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AT&#38;T Learns a Lesson - Don&#8217;t Try to Fool Your Base &#124; Seat at the Table</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-858311</link>
		<dc:creator>AT&#38;T Learns a Lesson - Don&#8217;t Try to Fool Your Base &#124; Seat at the Table</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 21:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-858311</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Mistake caught (retraction of 2-year contract requirement) http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/ [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mistake caught (retraction of 2-year contract requirement) <a href="http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/" rel="nofollow">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/</a> [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The AT&#38;T SIM-Only Drama Continues - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-858235</link>
		<dc:creator>The AT&#38;T SIM-Only Drama Continues - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-858235</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] AM PT Comments (0)   SMS Text News decided to get a contract free SIM from AT&amp;T after reading my previous post, and ran into some serious problems. Matt couldn’t even find the SIM-only deal on AT&amp;T’s [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] AM PT Comments (0)   SMS Text News decided to get a contract free SIM from AT&amp;T after reading my previous post, and ran into some serious problems. Matt couldn’t even find the SIM-only deal on AT&#38;T’s [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SMS Text News &#187; Archives &#187; AT&#38;T Is Still Confused On Contract-Free SIM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-858083</link>
		<dc:creator>SMS Text News &#187; Archives &#187; AT&#38;T Is Still Confused On Contract-Free SIM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 23:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-858083</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] thought it was a bit fishy when AT&amp;T got ahold of Om Malik to &#8216;clarify&#8217; that no contract was needed for the SIM-only deal, and wanted to check to [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] thought it was a bit fishy when AT&#38;T got ahold of Om Malik to &#8216;clarify&#8217; that no contract was needed for the SIM-only deal, and wanted to check to [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skydeck : AT&#38;T Sells SIM-only Service</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-858024</link>
		<dc:creator>Skydeck : AT&#38;T Sells SIM-only Service</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 18:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-858024</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] and Gizmodo ran articles on this bizarre offering, and a day later AT&amp;T said they had made a mistake. The SIM-only option does not require a 2-year contract, and will be available with a pre-paid or [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and Gizmodo ran articles on this bizarre offering, and a day later AT&amp;T said they had made a mistake. The SIM-only option does not require a 2-year contract, and will be available with a pre-paid or [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AT&#38;T more open. iPhone Next?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-857797</link>
		<dc:creator>AT&#38;T more open. iPhone Next?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-857797</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] phone, just buy the sim card&#8221; plan which no longer requires a long term commitment (after an aplogy). This is a huge step in US wireless industry, and just in time for the wireless spectrum auction, [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] phone, just buy the sim card&#8221; plan which no longer requires a long term commitment (after an aplogy). This is a huge step in US wireless industry, and just in time for the wireless spectrum auction, [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DP</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-857708</link>
		<dc:creator>DP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 06:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-857708</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well, it still says 2 years contract to buy the SIM card.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And it&#039;s sold out!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it still says 2 years contract to buy the SIM card.</p>

<p>And it&#8217;s sold out!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DP</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-857704</link>
		<dc:creator>DP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 06:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-857704</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Not sure why this is news.  AT&amp;T&#039;s been doing this for a while and without a 2 year contract.  Just did it for 2 of my own phones in the last 3 months.  Walked out with a SIM card with my number transferred from Sprint and only a 1 year contract.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m glad they are making it public that they are doing this.  Maybe we are finally seeing the floodgate starting to open to carriers lessening their grip on device OEMs.  About time.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure why this is news.  AT&amp;T&#8217;s been doing this for a while and without a 2 year contract.  Just did it for 2 of my own phones in the last 3 months.  Walked out with a SIM card with my number transferred from Sprint and only a 1 year contract.</p>

<p>I&#8217;m glad they are making it public that they are doing this.  Maybe we are finally seeing the floodgate starting to open to carriers lessening their grip on device OEMs.  About time.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-857676</link>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 04:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-857676</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Dave,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;thanks for the kind words. not sure, if i am the best reporter, but i am one for sure.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;@ rest of the guys - I did check with AT&amp;T folks and this is what they reaffirmed. If this doesn&#039;t get to their sales force, well, we all will be keeping them honest.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dave,</p>

<p>thanks for the kind words. not sure, if i am the best reporter, but i am one for sure.</p>

<p>@ rest of the guys &#8211; I did check with AT&amp;T folks and this is what they reaffirmed. If this doesn&#8217;t get to their sales force, well, we all will be keeping them honest.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Burstein</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-857647</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Burstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 00:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-857647</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Om&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Good to see the best reporter in this business back to work.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Om</p>

<p>Good to see the best reporter in this business back to work.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hoger</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-857637</link>
		<dc:creator>hoger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 22:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-857637</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Also the fact that ATT will snoop on all of your activity for the FEDS and potentially block any pirated content as well just for kicks!  This is all freely bundled with your account :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also the fact that ATT will snoop on all of your activity for the FEDS and potentially block any pirated content as well just for kicks!  This is all freely bundled with your account :)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ewan MacLeod</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-857636</link>
		<dc:creator>Ewan MacLeod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 22:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-857636</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;As KMY points out, the critical element is communicating this news to the AT&amp;T sales team in the field who&#039;re busy telling everyone that such a deal is impossible.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As KMY points out, the critical element is communicating this news to the AT&amp;T sales team in the field who&#8217;re busy telling everyone that such a deal is impossible.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kmy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-857634</link>
		<dc:creator>kmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-857634</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Om-&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Just called an ATT store to see what plan is available without a 2-yr contract if you only need to get a new SIM card.  The reply was none...all plans require a 2-yr.  You might want to call ATT to get more clarification because nothing really had changed.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Om-</p>

<p>Just called an ATT store to see what plan is available without a 2-yr contract if you only need to get a new SIM card.  The reply was none&#8230;all plans require a 2-yr.  You might want to call ATT to get more clarification because nothing really had changed.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
