<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AT&amp;T Says SIM Contract Fiasco a Mistake</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:07:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald Noble</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-191727</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Noble]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 16:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-191727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is all well and good, IF it works. It sounds like it is hit or miss with people visiting stores and calling. Can anyone produce an email, website or anything concrete from AT&amp;T to back this up?
Don]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is all well and good, IF it works. It sounds like it is hit or miss with people visiting stores and calling. Can anyone produce an email, website or anything concrete from AT&amp;T to back this up?<br />
Don</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Hugo</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-191726</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack Hugo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 15:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-191726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;From looking around it seems that ATT is the only one offering &#039;SIM card only&#039; for $25, ONLY with 2 yrs contract?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;All over Asia one can buy a SIM card only, for as little as $5 with minutes SMART or GLOBE - Philippines -$1.50 without minutes- Cellcom/Malaysia - $10 with minutes - HKTEL/Macau, amongst others (INDIA/SINGAPORE etc) consumers benefit because of healthy competition.  Why are the US carriers allowed to charge 1)high fees and 2)shove contracts on consumers&#039; faces and on top of that 3)charge money when you get incoming phone calls?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From looking around it seems that ATT is the only one offering &#8216;SIM card only&#8217; for $25, ONLY with 2 yrs contract?</p>
<p>All over Asia one can buy a SIM card only, for as little as $5 with minutes SMART or GLOBE &#8211; Philippines -$1.50 without minutes- Cellcom/Malaysia &#8211; $10 with minutes &#8211; HKTEL/Macau, amongst others (INDIA/SINGAPORE etc) consumers benefit because of healthy competition.  Why are the US carriers allowed to charge 1)high fees and 2)shove contracts on consumers&#8217; faces and on top of that 3)charge money when you get incoming phone calls?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-191725</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 23:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-191725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Just tried this at a store tonight, they said absolutely no way can you get postpaid service without a contract.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just tried this at a store tonight, they said absolutely no way can you get postpaid service without a contract.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-191724</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 14:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-191724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Correct me if I&#039;m wrong, but does anyone have an actual link to anything by ATT actually saying this?  I keep seeing websites talking about it, but as of now, its all just made up crap.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correct me if I&#8217;m wrong, but does anyone have an actual link to anything by ATT actually saying this?  I keep seeing websites talking about it, but as of now, its all just made up crap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AT&#38;T Learns a Lesson - Don&#8217;t Try to Fool Your Base &#124; Seat at the Table</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-191723</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AT&#38;T Learns a Lesson - Don&#8217;t Try to Fool Your Base &#124; Seat at the Table]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 21:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-191723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Mistake caught (retraction of 2-year contract requirement) http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/ [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mistake caught (retraction of 2-year contract requirement) <a href="http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/" rel="nofollow">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The AT&#38;T SIM-Only Drama Continues - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-191722</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The AT&#38;T SIM-Only Drama Continues - GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-191722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] AM PT Comments (0)   SMS Text News decided to get a contract free SIM from AT&amp;T after reading my previous post, and ran into some serious problems. Matt couldn’t even find the SIM-only deal on AT&amp;T’s [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] AM PT Comments (0)   SMS Text News decided to get a contract free SIM from AT&amp;T after reading my previous post, and ran into some serious problems. Matt couldn’t even find the SIM-only deal on AT&#38;T’s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The AT&#38;T SIM-Only Drama Continues - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-210658</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The AT&#38;T SIM-Only Drama Continues - GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-210658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] AM PT Comments (0)   SMS Text News decided to get a contract free SIM from AT&amp;T after reading my previous post, and ran into some serious problems. Matt couldn’t even find the SIM-only deal on AT&amp;T’s [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] AM PT Comments (0)   SMS Text News decided to get a contract free SIM from AT&amp;T after reading my previous post, and ran into some serious problems. Matt couldn’t even find the SIM-only deal on AT&#38;T’s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The AT&#38;T SIM-Only Drama Continues - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-210871</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The AT&#38;T SIM-Only Drama Continues - GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-210871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] AM PT Comments (0)   SMS Text News decided to get a contract free SIM from AT&amp;T after reading my previous post, and ran into some serious problems. Matt couldn’t even find the SIM-only deal on AT&amp;T’s [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] AM PT Comments (0)   SMS Text News decided to get a contract free SIM from AT&amp;T after reading my previous post, and ran into some serious problems. Matt couldn’t even find the SIM-only deal on AT&#38;T’s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SMS Text News &#187; Archives &#187; AT&#38;T Is Still Confused On Contract-Free SIM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-191721</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SMS Text News &#187; Archives &#187; AT&#38;T Is Still Confused On Contract-Free SIM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 23:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-191721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] thought it was a bit fishy when AT&amp;T got ahold of Om Malik to &#8216;clarify&#8217; that no contract was needed for the SIM-only deal, and wanted to check to [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] thought it was a bit fishy when AT&#38;T got ahold of Om Malik to &#8216;clarify&#8217; that no contract was needed for the SIM-only deal, and wanted to check to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SMS Text News &#187; Archives &#187; AT&#38;T Is Still Confused On Contract-Free SIM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-210657</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SMS Text News &#187; Archives &#187; AT&#38;T Is Still Confused On Contract-Free SIM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 23:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-210657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] thought it was a bit fishy when AT&amp;T got ahold of Om Malik to &#8216;clarify&#8217; that no contract was needed for the SIM-only deal, and wanted to check to [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] thought it was a bit fishy when AT&#38;T got ahold of Om Malik to &#8216;clarify&#8217; that no contract was needed for the SIM-only deal, and wanted to check to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SMS Text News &#187; Archives &#187; AT&#38;T Is Still Confused On Contract-Free SIM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-210870</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SMS Text News &#187; Archives &#187; AT&#38;T Is Still Confused On Contract-Free SIM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 23:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-210870</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] thought it was a bit fishy when AT&amp;T got ahold of Om Malik to &#8216;clarify&#8217; that no contract was needed for the SIM-only deal, and wanted to check to [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] thought it was a bit fishy when AT&#38;T got ahold of Om Malik to &#8216;clarify&#8217; that no contract was needed for the SIM-only deal, and wanted to check to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skydeck : AT&#38;T Sells SIM-only Service</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-191720</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Skydeck : AT&#38;T Sells SIM-only Service]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 18:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-191720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] and Gizmodo ran articles on this bizarre offering, and a day later AT&amp;T said they had made a mistake. The SIM-only option does not require a 2-year contract, and will be available with a pre-paid or [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and Gizmodo ran articles on this bizarre offering, and a day later AT&amp;T said they had made a mistake. The SIM-only option does not require a 2-year contract, and will be available with a pre-paid or [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skydeck : AT&#38;T Sells SIM-only Service</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-210656</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Skydeck : AT&#38;T Sells SIM-only Service]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 18:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-210656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] and Gizmodo ran articles on this bizarre offering, and a day later AT&amp;T said they had made a mistake. The SIM-only option does not require a 2-year contract, and will be available with a pre-paid or [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and Gizmodo ran articles on this bizarre offering, and a day later AT&amp;T said they had made a mistake. The SIM-only option does not require a 2-year contract, and will be available with a pre-paid or [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skydeck : AT&#38;T Sells SIM-only Service</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-210869</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Skydeck : AT&#38;T Sells SIM-only Service]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 18:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-210869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] and Gizmodo ran articles on this bizarre offering, and a day later AT&amp;T said they had made a mistake. The SIM-only option does not require a 2-year contract, and will be available with a pre-paid or [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and Gizmodo ran articles on this bizarre offering, and a day later AT&amp;T said they had made a mistake. The SIM-only option does not require a 2-year contract, and will be available with a pre-paid or [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AT&#38;T more open. iPhone Next?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-191719</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AT&#38;T more open. iPhone Next?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-191719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] phone, just buy the sim card&#8221; plan which no longer requires a long term commitment (after an aplogy). This is a huge step in US wireless industry, and just in time for the wireless spectrum auction, [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] phone, just buy the sim card&#8221; plan which no longer requires a long term commitment (after an aplogy). This is a huge step in US wireless industry, and just in time for the wireless spectrum auction, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AT&#38;T more open. iPhone Next?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-210655</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AT&#38;T more open. iPhone Next?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/att-says-sim-contract-fiasco-a-mistake/#comment-210655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] phone, just buy the sim card&#8221; plan which no longer requires a long term commitment (after an aplogy). This is a huge step in US wireless industry, and just in time for the wireless spectrum auction, [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] phone, just buy the sim card&#8221; plan which no longer requires a long term commitment (after an aplogy). This is a huge step in US wireless industry, and just in time for the wireless spectrum auction, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

