<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Circumvent that Patent Tar Pit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/01/17/circumvent-that-patent-tar-pit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/17/circumvent-that-patent-tar-pit/</link>
	<description>Business, Internet, Technology &#38; Strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 07:13:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve G.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/17/circumvent-that-patent-tar-pit/#comment-874849</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foundread.com/2008/01/17/circumvent-that-patent-tar-pit/#comment-874849</guid>
		<description>Wow, either the author doesn&#039;t understand patents or can&#039;t be bothered to read the documentation on the Peer to Patent Web site - I&#039;m not sure which is worse.

This is &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; a substitute for filing a patent application - it is a tool to assist in locating relevant &quot;prior art&quot; to determine if an application will meet the USPTO standards of novelty and non-obviousness.

So, as much as you&#039;d like to avoid paying a patent attorney (like me), you still need to file an application before this system can be used. Otherwise, you&#039;re just exposing your idea to the world to see for free and throwing away any potential patent rights in the process.

Oh, and if you&#039;re being charged $30,000 to file a patent application (just for the preparation and filing of the application, not seeing it through to issue), it had better be a huge application or you&#039;re getting ripped off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, either the author doesn&#8217;t understand patents or can&#8217;t be bothered to read the documentation on the Peer to Patent Web site &#8211; I&#8217;m not sure which is worse.</p>
<p>This is <em>not</em> a substitute for filing a patent application &#8211; it is a tool to assist in locating relevant &#8220;prior art&#8221; to determine if an application will meet the USPTO standards of novelty and non-obviousness.</p>
<p>So, as much as you&#8217;d like to avoid paying a patent attorney (like me), you still need to file an application before this system can be used. Otherwise, you&#8217;re just exposing your idea to the world to see for free and throwing away any potential patent rights in the process.</p>
<p>Oh, and if you&#8217;re being charged $30,000 to file a patent application (just for the preparation and filing of the application, not seeing it through to issue), it had better be a huge application or you&#8217;re getting ripped off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The infamous patent tar-pit &#171; nPost Startup Blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/17/circumvent-that-patent-tar-pit/#comment-874850</link>
		<dc:creator>The infamous patent tar-pit &#171; nPost Startup Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 01:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foundread.com/2008/01/17/circumvent-that-patent-tar-pit/#comment-874850</guid>
		<description>[...] The infamous patent&#160;tar-pit  Or maybe not so famous, but here are some interesting suggestions for getting from mired in the all encompassing goo that is the patent world. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The infamous patent&nbsp;tar-pit  Or maybe not so famous, but here are some interesting suggestions for getting from mired in the all encompassing goo that is the patent world. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
