<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Speed Bumps Ahead for WiMAX</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/01/05/more-speed-bumps-ahead-for-wimax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/05/more-speed-bumps-ahead-for-wimax/</link>
	<description>Tracking the Internet Evolution</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 14:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ames Tiedeman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/05/more-speed-bumps-ahead-for-wimax/#comment-872969</link>
		<dc:creator>Ames Tiedeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 11:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/05/more-speed-bumps-ahead-for-wimax/#comment-872969</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Look like ALVR was awarded approval on an industry standard. This is just what is needed.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look like ALVR was awarded approval on an industry standard. This is just what is needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ames Tiedeman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/05/more-speed-bumps-ahead-for-wimax/#comment-871696</link>
		<dc:creator>Ames Tiedeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/05/more-speed-bumps-ahead-for-wimax/#comment-871696</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;AIRN looks dead. What is going on with this name?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AIRN looks dead. What is going on with this name?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ames Tiedeman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/05/more-speed-bumps-ahead-for-wimax/#comment-857765</link>
		<dc:creator>Ames Tiedeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/05/more-speed-bumps-ahead-for-wimax/#comment-857765</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;ALVR just got another win. This time from TDS.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ALVR just got another win. This time from TDS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ames Tiedeman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/05/more-speed-bumps-ahead-for-wimax/#comment-853791</link>
		<dc:creator>Ames Tiedeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 15:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/05/more-speed-bumps-ahead-for-wimax/#comment-853791</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The Wi-Max stocks are getting killed led by AIRN and ALVR&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Wi-Max stocks are getting killed led by AIRN and ALVR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ames Tiedeman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/05/more-speed-bumps-ahead-for-wimax/#comment-851152</link>
		<dc:creator>Ames Tiedeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/05/more-speed-bumps-ahead-for-wimax/#comment-851152</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;There was a very positive article about Wi-Max at yahoo finance yesterday. 2008/2009 appear to be  big years for the technology.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a very positive article about Wi-Max at yahoo finance yesterday. 2008/2009 appear to be  big years for the technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WiMAX at CES, Part 1 &#171; Media Experiences 2 Go</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/05/more-speed-bumps-ahead-for-wimax/#comment-849659</link>
		<dc:creator>WiMAX at CES, Part 1 &#171; Media Experiences 2 Go</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/05/more-speed-bumps-ahead-for-wimax/#comment-849659</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] On the one hand, people who experience it walk away impressed. On the other hand, there has been significant skepticism since the break-up of Sprint and Clearwire and Verizon’s decision to move forward with LTE as a [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] On the one hand, people who experience it walk away impressed. On the other hand, there has been significant skepticism since the break-up of Sprint and Clearwire and Verizon’s decision to move forward with LTE as a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drive-By WiMAX at CES - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/05/more-speed-bumps-ahead-for-wimax/#comment-842544</link>
		<dc:creator>Drive-By WiMAX at CES - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/05/more-speed-bumps-ahead-for-wimax/#comment-842544</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Thursday, January 10, 2008 at 9:39 AM PT Comments (1)   After talking earlier this week about the speed bumps that U.S. WiMAX deployment faces, it only seemed proper to take a ride in the WiMAX-equipped [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Thursday, January 10, 2008 at 9:39 AM PT Comments (1)   After talking earlier this week about the speed bumps that U.S. WiMAX deployment faces, it only seemed proper to take a ride in the WiMAX-equipped [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Intel: WiMAX PC Card by June - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/05/more-speed-bumps-ahead-for-wimax/#comment-838301</link>
		<dc:creator>Intel: WiMAX PC Card by June - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 00:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/05/more-speed-bumps-ahead-for-wimax/#comment-838301</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] some recent bumps in the road for WiMAX, top executives from major WiMAX backers Intel, Sprint Nextel and Cisco all said at CES [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] some recent bumps in the road for WiMAX, top executives from major WiMAX backers Intel, Sprint Nextel and Cisco all said at CES [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ames Tiedeman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/05/more-speed-bumps-ahead-for-wimax/#comment-834961</link>
		<dc:creator>Ames Tiedeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 07:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/05/more-speed-bumps-ahead-for-wimax/#comment-834961</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Jesse:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What you said makes sense. Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesse:</p>
<p>What you said makes sense. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kopelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/05/more-speed-bumps-ahead-for-wimax/#comment-834594</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Kopelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 04:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/05/more-speed-bumps-ahead-for-wimax/#comment-834594</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Ames&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The problem is that three companies own the vast majority of the spectrum that is best suited for WiMAX in the US: Sprint, AT&#38;T, and Verizon (T-Mobile and Clearwire are far far behind these others). Both Verizon and AT&#38;T are quite profitable with their current offerings and something like WiMAX might actually lose them money if it comes too soon, as enabling 3rd-party VoIP would eat into their mobile voice cash cows. Sprint, which is not doing nearly so well as its larger competitors sees WiMAX as a competitive differentiator and thus wants it sooner rather than later. The problem is some of Sprint's largest investors would rather the company focus on making them short term profits rather than investing in a new network which may not pay for itself in less than 10 years (Verizon had this same problem in the early days of FiOS and it may reoccur periodically as fortunes change both for that service and the overall company).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ames</p>
<p>The problem is that three companies own the vast majority of the spectrum that is best suited for WiMAX in the US: Sprint, AT&amp;T, and Verizon (T-Mobile and Clearwire are far far behind these others). Both Verizon and AT&amp;T are quite profitable with their current offerings and something like WiMAX might actually lose them money if it comes too soon, as enabling 3rd-party VoIP would eat into their mobile voice cash cows. Sprint, which is not doing nearly so well as its larger competitors sees WiMAX as a competitive differentiator and thus wants it sooner rather than later. The problem is some of Sprint&#8217;s largest investors would rather the company focus on making them short term profits rather than investing in a new network which may not pay for itself in less than 10 years (Verizon had this same problem in the early days of FiOS and it may reoccur periodically as fortunes change both for that service and the overall company).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeraldZ</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/05/more-speed-bumps-ahead-for-wimax/#comment-834398</link>
		<dc:creator>GeraldZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 02:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/05/more-speed-bumps-ahead-for-wimax/#comment-834398</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I remember the days when cellular phones where carried around in little duffle-bag looking packs.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Some day we will be looking back at a time when WiMax didn't exist and we had to search to find a WiFi hotspot.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Make no mistake, WiMax is coming.  And when it does arrive, there will be an armageddon in the telephone, cellular, cable, satellite and other industries.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://rsslivetv.com&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember the days when cellular phones where carried around in little duffle-bag looking packs.</p>
<p>Some day we will be looking back at a time when WiMax didn&#8217;t exist and we had to search to find a WiFi hotspot.</p>
<p>Make no mistake, WiMax is coming.  And when it does arrive, there will be an armageddon in the telephone, cellular, cable, satellite and other industries.</p>
<p><a href="http://rsslivetv.com" rel="nofollow">http://rsslivetv.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Kapustka</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/05/more-speed-bumps-ahead-for-wimax/#comment-833755</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Kapustka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 21:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/05/more-speed-bumps-ahead-for-wimax/#comment-833755</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Bashar, from what AT&#38;T has said they are migrating to LTE for 4G as well. See &lt;a href="http://gigaom.com/2007/11/29/verizon-picks-lte-as-4g-standard-for-wireless-broadband/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Om's story&lt;/a&gt; from last year.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bashar, from what AT&amp;T has said they are migrating to LTE for 4G as well. See <a href="http://gigaom.com/2007/11/29/verizon-picks-lte-as-4g-standard-for-wireless-broadband/" rel="nofollow">Om&#8217;s story</a> from last year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bashar</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/05/more-speed-bumps-ahead-for-wimax/#comment-832251</link>
		<dc:creator>Bashar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 14:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/05/more-speed-bumps-ahead-for-wimax/#comment-832251</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think you meant Verizon's dumping of WiMax in favor of LTE not AT&#38;T: Verizon is currently on CDMA Technology and AT&#38;T is on GSM.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you meant Verizon&#8217;s dumping of WiMax in favor of LTE not AT&amp;T: Verizon is currently on CDMA Technology and AT&amp;T is on GSM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ames Tiedeman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/05/more-speed-bumps-ahead-for-wimax/#comment-832091</link>
		<dc:creator>Ames Tiedeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 13:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/05/more-speed-bumps-ahead-for-wimax/#comment-832091</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It is disturbing to hear of the WiMax setbacks. It appears much of the world is doing a better job with WiMax than we are here in the USA. The Israeli company Alvarion is doing wonders in Japan, east Asia and Africa. WiMax is much better than WiFi, in my opinion.  What is the problem in the U.S.A? Any ideas?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is disturbing to hear of the WiMax setbacks. It appears much of the world is doing a better job with WiMax than we are here in the USA. The Israeli company Alvarion is doing wonders in Japan, east Asia and Africa. WiMax is much better than WiFi, in my opinion.  What is the problem in the U.S.A? Any ideas?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Get Better Soon, Om &#171; Sidecut Reports</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/05/more-speed-bumps-ahead-for-wimax/#comment-829377</link>
		<dc:creator>Get Better Soon, Om &#171; Sidecut Reports</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 18:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/05/more-speed-bumps-ahead-for-wimax/#comment-829377</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] a related note, you may see my byline cropping back up at GigaOM, as I help them out with telecom-related coverage. Send any announcements, news and tips [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a related note, you may see my byline cropping back up at GigaOM, as I help them out with telecom-related coverage. Send any announcements, news and tips [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
