<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monster.com Pays $61M to Get into Social Networking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2008/01/04/monstercom-buys-affinity-labs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/04/monstercom-buys-affinity-labs/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 16:05:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Parreco</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/04/monstercom-buys-affinity-labs/#comment-190261</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Parreco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 17:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/04/monstercom-buys-affinity-labs/#comment-190261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The site for those who love the Italy that you won’t experience on the tour-bus itinerary.

A social network dedicated to those who appreciate Italy the regional, the seasonal; hidden nooks, funky festivals, the restaurant where the owner is your host, chef and sommelier; the Barista who.....

Well, you get our idea.

What’s yours?

read…recommend….share

www.IntimatelyItaly.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The site for those who love the Italy that you won’t experience on the tour-bus itinerary.</p>
<p>A social network dedicated to those who appreciate Italy the regional, the seasonal; hidden nooks, funky festivals, the restaurant where the owner is your host, chef and sommelier; the Barista who&#8230;..</p>
<p>Well, you get our idea.</p>
<p>What’s yours?</p>
<p>read…recommend….share</p>
<p><a href="http://www.IntimatelyItaly.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.IntimatelyItaly.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/04/monstercom-buys-affinity-labs/#comment-190260</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 21:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/04/monstercom-buys-affinity-labs/#comment-190260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am surprised no one noticed that there were rumors floating around the week after the Affinity acquisition that Murdoch might buy Monster. In which case, Monster would have been quite anxious to show that it had the social networking sector covered in an attempt to make a Murdoch acquisition more exciting.

http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/10/murdoch-said-to-offer-48-billion-for-monster/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am surprised no one noticed that there were rumors floating around the week after the Affinity acquisition that Murdoch might buy Monster. In which case, Monster would have been quite anxious to show that it had the social networking sector covered in an attempt to make a Murdoch acquisition more exciting.</p>
<p><a href="http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/10/murdoch-said-to-offer-48-billion-for-monster/" rel="nofollow">http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/10/murdoch-said-to-offer-48-billion-for-monster/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eric shannon</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/04/monstercom-buys-affinity-labs/#comment-190259</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[eric shannon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 13:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/04/monstercom-buys-affinity-labs/#comment-190259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[here is a summary of monster.com and careerbuilder.com activities in the niche job board markets - http://internetinc.com/job-board-niches-analysis-2008]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>here is a summary of monster.com and careerbuilder.com activities in the niche job board markets &#8211; <a href="http://internetinc.com/job-board-niches-analysis-2008" rel="nofollow">http://internetinc.com/job-board-niches-analysis-2008</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: job board news</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/04/monstercom-buys-affinity-labs/#comment-190258</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[job board news]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 21:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/04/monstercom-buys-affinity-labs/#comment-190258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[with the exception of the jobs.com purchase monster has a knack for ignoring fundamentals and chasing extravagant strategic goals]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>with the exception of the jobs.com purchase monster has a knack for ignoring fundamentals and chasing extravagant strategic goals</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Imaginate Productions &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Thought of the Day: On Time &#38; How to Invest It</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/04/monstercom-buys-affinity-labs/#comment-190257</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Imaginate Productions &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Thought of the Day: On Time &#38; How to Invest It]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/04/monstercom-buys-affinity-labs/#comment-190257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] communities. Founded in 2006, the company was backed by the Mayfield Fund and Trinity Ventures and  acquired by Monster Worldwide (Nasdaq:MNST) in January for $61 million in cash. Military.com, the nation’s largest military membership organization, connects its over 9 million [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] communities. Founded in 2006, the company was backed by the Mayfield Fund and Trinity Ventures and  acquired by Monster Worldwide (Nasdaq:MNST) in January for $61 million in cash. Military.com, the nation’s largest military membership organization, connects its over 9 million [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Imaginate Productions &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Thought of the Day: On Time &#38; How to Invest It</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/04/monstercom-buys-affinity-labs/#comment-210641</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Imaginate Productions &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Thought of the Day: On Time &#38; How to Invest It]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/04/monstercom-buys-affinity-labs/#comment-210641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] communities. Founded in 2006, the company was backed by the Mayfield Fund and Trinity Ventures and  acquired by Monster Worldwide (Nasdaq:MNST) in January for $61 million in cash. Military.com, the nation’s largest military membership organization, connects its over 9 million [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] communities. Founded in 2006, the company was backed by the Mayfield Fund and Trinity Ventures and  acquired by Monster Worldwide (Nasdaq:MNST) in January for $61 million in cash. Military.com, the nation’s largest military membership organization, connects its over 9 million [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Imaginate Productions &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Thought of the Day: On Time &#38; How to Invest It</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/04/monstercom-buys-affinity-labs/#comment-210854</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Imaginate Productions &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Thought of the Day: On Time &#38; How to Invest It]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/04/monstercom-buys-affinity-labs/#comment-210854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] communities. Founded in 2006, the company was backed by the Mayfield Fund and Trinity Ventures and  acquired by Monster Worldwide (Nasdaq:MNST) in January for $61 million in cash. Military.com, the nation’s largest military membership organization, connects its over 9 million [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] communities. Founded in 2006, the company was backed by the Mayfield Fund and Trinity Ventures and  acquired by Monster Worldwide (Nasdaq:MNST) in January for $61 million in cash. Military.com, the nation’s largest military membership organization, connects its over 9 million [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philipp Schumann</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/04/monstercom-buys-affinity-labs/#comment-190256</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Philipp Schumann]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/04/monstercom-buys-affinity-labs/#comment-190256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;&quot;Can anybody tell me why they paid such a premium for what they could have created in a short period?&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Because they couldn&#039;t have. Unless you are driven by love for the thing or a desire to be bought or ideally both, building these things takes forever, especially in larger organisations. The purchase price must be a combination of (1) buying out the staff there who are probably exceptionally talented and motivated (at least before the purchase of their startup) PLUS (2) paying for the existing user base PLUS (3) real and projected revenues.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Can anybody tell me why they paid such a premium for what they could have created in a short period?&#8221;</p>
<p>Because they couldn&#8217;t have. Unless you are driven by love for the thing or a desire to be bought or ideally both, building these things takes forever, especially in larger organisations. The purchase price must be a combination of (1) buying out the staff there who are probably exceptionally talented and motivated (at least before the purchase of their startup) PLUS (2) paying for the existing user base PLUS (3) real and projected revenues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Sales feed egos. Margins feed families.&#8221; &#171; FoundRead</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/04/monstercom-buys-affinity-labs/#comment-190255</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#8220;Sales feed egos. Margins feed families.&#8221; &#171; FoundRead]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 02:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/04/monstercom-buys-affinity-labs/#comment-190255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] in 1999, sold it to Monster.com in 2004 for $40 million, then founded Affinity Labs, which he sold to Monster for even more &#8212; $61 million &#8212; earlier this month.  Talk about outcomes. Congratulations, Chris!     No comments Share/Send     Topic: Case Study  [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in 1999, sold it to Monster.com in 2004 for $40 million, then founded Affinity Labs, which he sold to Monster for even more &#8212; $61 million &#8212; earlier this month.  Talk about outcomes. Congratulations, Chris!     No comments Share/Send     Topic: Case Study  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Weider</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2008/01/04/monstercom-buys-affinity-labs/#comment-190254</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd Weider]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 18:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/01/04/monstercom-buys-affinity-labs/#comment-190254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;In my opinion; this move is a bit aggressive for Monster. They already have a user base and access to a pretty large pool of jobbers and employers.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Can anybody tell me why they paid such a premium for what they could have created in a short period?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion; this move is a bit aggressive for Monster. They already have a user base and access to a pretty large pool of jobbers and employers.</p>
<p>Can anybody tell me why they paid such a premium for what they could have created in a short period?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
