<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If It&#039;s Not PC, It&#039;s Not For Intel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/12/19/if-its-not-pc-its-not-for-intel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/12/19/if-its-not-pc-its-not-for-intel/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:29:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kopelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/12/19/if-its-not-pc-its-not-for-intel/#comment-188339</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesse Kopelman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 22:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/12/19/if-its-not-pc-its-not-for-intel/#comment-188339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;What is this, GigaHearst?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is this, GigaHearst?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/12/19/if-its-not-pc-its-not-for-intel/#comment-188338</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 22:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/12/19/if-its-not-pc-its-not-for-intel/#comment-188338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Did they sell off the group hoping to promote Linux/MID in 2008?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did they sell off the group hoping to promote Linux/MID in 2008?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/12/19/if-its-not-pc-its-not-for-intel/#comment-188337</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om Malik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 04:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/12/19/if-its-not-pc-its-not-for-intel/#comment-188337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Hey Jesse, but it (I mean the headline) has a nice ring to it. Don&#039;t you think? ;-)&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Jesse, but it (I mean the headline) has a nice ring to it. Don&#8217;t you think? ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kopelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/12/19/if-its-not-pc-its-not-for-intel/#comment-188336</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesse Kopelman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 23:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/12/19/if-its-not-pc-its-not-for-intel/#comment-188336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Your title should substitute microprocessor for PC. After all, Intel is still making CPU for servers, which are certainly not personnel computers. They are also going hot and heavy into embedded devices and smart phone/PDA, which may well be personnel computers in some cases, but are not often classed as such. Meanwhile, you can&#039;t just say CPU either, as they are still the leader in GPU sales by unit (thanks to integrated chipsets) and are making this a bigger R&amp;D focus in the near term.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your title should substitute microprocessor for PC. After all, Intel is still making CPU for servers, which are certainly not personnel computers. They are also going hot and heavy into embedded devices and smart phone/PDA, which may well be personnel computers in some cases, but are not often classed as such. Meanwhile, you can&#8217;t just say CPU either, as they are still the leader in GPU sales by unit (thanks to integrated chipsets) and are making this a bigger R&amp;D focus in the near term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/12/19/if-its-not-pc-its-not-for-intel/#comment-188335</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om Malik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 14:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/12/19/if-its-not-pc-its-not-for-intel/#comment-188335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Good one Intel. thanks for the reminder on that.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good one Intel. thanks for the reminder on that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/12/19/if-its-not-pc-its-not-for-intel/#comment-188334</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 13:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/12/19/if-its-not-pc-its-not-for-intel/#comment-188334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Intel also sold their telephony gateway card business to Dialogic.  They sold their baseband communications chips to Marvell.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Intel also sold their telephony gateway card business to Dialogic.  They sold their baseband communications chips to Marvell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

