<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Are Some HD Shows S T R E T C H E D?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/12/16/why-are-some-hd-shows-s-t-r-e-t-c-h-e-d/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/12/16/why-are-some-hd-shows-s-t-r-e-t-c-h-e-d/</link>
	<description>The Business of Technology</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 04:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Logical Extremes</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/12/16/why-are-some-hd-shows-s-t-r-e-t-c-h-e-d/#comment-778523</link>
		<dc:creator>Logical Extremes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 22:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/12/16/why-are-some-hd-shows-s-t-r-e-t-c-h-e-d/#comment-778523</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This is even more annoying than fullscreen DVDs. There are two drivers for this... first is an uneducated desire to fill a screen no matter what that does to the content, and second is a desire by some to avoid burning in their pricey flat screen HDTVs with pillarbox lines (certain display technologies are more prone). Stand up for your right to watch content in its original aspect ratio! And, don't buy in to technologies that favor distorted images.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is even more annoying than fullscreen DVDs. There are two drivers for this&#8230; first is an uneducated desire to fill a screen no matter what that does to the content, and second is a desire by some to avoid burning in their pricey flat screen HDTVs with pillarbox lines (certain display technologies are more prone). Stand up for your right to watch content in its original aspect ratio! And, don&#8217;t buy in to technologies that favor distorted images.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Albrecht</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/12/16/why-are-some-hd-shows-s-t-r-e-t-c-h-e-d/#comment-777990</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Albrecht</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 16:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/12/16/why-are-some-hd-shows-s-t-r-e-t-c-h-e-d/#comment-777990</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Brian,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That's actually a "Flexview." The full article talks about it.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Brian,</p>
<p>That&#8217;s actually a &#8220;Flexview.&#8221; The full article talks about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian White</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/12/16/why-are-some-hd-shows-s-t-r-e-t-c-h-e-d/#comment-777946</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 16:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/12/16/why-are-some-hd-shows-s-t-r-e-t-c-h-e-d/#comment-777946</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;They seem to be cheating with an algorithm that extends a 4:3 picture to fit your HD screen...normal ratio in the middle, and increasingly stretched to the edges.  It's hugely annoying.  I hope this is a trend that goes by the wayside, the way black &#38; white movie colorizing eventually went away in the early 90s.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They seem to be cheating with an algorithm that extends a 4:3 picture to fit your HD screen&#8230;normal ratio in the middle, and increasingly stretched to the edges.  It&#8217;s hugely annoying.  I hope this is a trend that goes by the wayside, the way black &amp; white movie colorizing eventually went away in the early 90s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
