<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hey Transistor, Happy 60th. Now Move Closer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/12/16/hey-transistor-happy-60th-birthday-now-move-over-closer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/12/16/hey-transistor-happy-60th-birthday-now-move-over-closer/</link>
	<description>Tracking the Internet Evolution</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 09:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: brainwashing.eu &#187; Buon Compleanno Transistor</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/12/16/hey-transistor-happy-60th-birthday-now-move-over-closer/#comment-781514</link>
		<dc:creator>brainwashing.eu &#187; Buon Compleanno Transistor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 00:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/12/16/hey-transistor-happy-60th-birthday-now-move-over-closer/#comment-781514</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] approfondimenti potete leggere articoli anche decisamente più interessanti su Gigaom  e CNN e potete leggere la storia del transistor su [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] approfondimenti potete leggere articoli anche decisamente più interessanti su Gigaom  e CNN e potete leggere la storia del transistor su [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Let&#8217;s see how far we&#8217;ve come&#8230; &#171; David Gillespie&#8217;s Wide Open Spaces</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/12/16/hey-transistor-happy-60th-birthday-now-move-over-closer/#comment-781351</link>
		<dc:creator>Let&#8217;s see how far we&#8217;ve come&#8230; &#171; David Gillespie&#8217;s Wide Open Spaces</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 22:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/12/16/hey-transistor-happy-60th-birthday-now-move-over-closer/#comment-781351</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] me feel better though is this and this. The former taking Web 2.0 enhancements with you wherever you go (equal parts crucial and awesome) [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] me feel better though is this and this. The former taking Web 2.0 enhancements with you wherever you go (equal parts crucial and awesome) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lou Covey</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/12/16/hey-transistor-happy-60th-birthday-now-move-over-closer/#comment-781330</link>
		<dc:creator>Lou Covey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 22:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/12/16/hey-transistor-happy-60th-birthday-now-move-over-closer/#comment-781330</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The ability to stuff more processors or more transistors onto a chip pales in comparison to the ability to create software to run on these megachips.  That's the real problem and it's only being addressed now by companies investigating new standards and the use of virtualization to design software and hardware concurrently.  You can get the performance of a multicore chip by using an accelerator, usually on a small FPGA, paired with an off the shelf processor.  It costs a lot less, gives you what you need and takes weeks to deliver a design, rather than years.
Just because it can be done doesn't mean you have to do it.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ability to stuff more processors or more transistors onto a chip pales in comparison to the ability to create software to run on these megachips.  That&#8217;s the real problem and it&#8217;s only being addressed now by companies investigating new standards and the use of virtualization to design software and hardware concurrently.  You can get the performance of a multicore chip by using an accelerator, usually on a small FPGA, paired with an off the shelf processor.  It costs a lot less, gives you what you need and takes weeks to deliver a design, rather than years.<br />
Just because it can be done doesn&#8217;t mean you have to do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rohit</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/12/16/hey-transistor-happy-60th-birthday-now-move-over-closer/#comment-780341</link>
		<dc:creator>rohit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/12/16/hey-transistor-happy-60th-birthday-now-move-over-closer/#comment-780341</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;storage is doing fine... Fujitsu Eagle in mid/late 80s 
470 MB in 10-1/2 inches (6U) of 19-inch rack space, at a retail price of about US$ 10,000.
see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fujitsu_Eagle
to TeraByte drives in a twentieth of the volume and a tenth of the price (if not less)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>storage is doing fine&#8230; Fujitsu Eagle in mid/late 80s<br />
470 MB in 10-1/2 inches (6U) of 19-inch rack space, at a retail price of about US$ 10,000.<br />
see <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fujitsu_Eagle" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fujitsu_Eagle</a><br />
to TeraByte drives in a twentieth of the volume and a tenth of the price (if not less)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transistor - 60th anniversary &#171; Reasonable Deviations</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/12/16/hey-transistor-happy-60th-birthday-now-move-over-closer/#comment-780091</link>
		<dc:creator>Transistor - 60th anniversary &#171; Reasonable Deviations</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 15:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/12/16/hey-transistor-happy-60th-birthday-now-move-over-closer/#comment-780091</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] More info at: engadget, EE Times, GigaOM. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More info at: engadget, EE Times, GigaOM. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/12/16/hey-transistor-happy-60th-birthday-now-move-over-closer/#comment-780087</link>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 15:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/12/16/hey-transistor-happy-60th-birthday-now-move-over-closer/#comment-780087</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Good point Pete. I think there are some fundamental problems in the "physics" of technology as we know it that need to be tackled. From an innovation standpoint, it is perhaps the most exciting time - but I often wonder when it is going to happen. Last I checked the R&#38;D investments by the US Government and US companies were shrinking.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point Pete. I think there are some fundamental problems in the &#8220;physics&#8221; of technology as we know it that need to be tackled. From an innovation standpoint, it is perhaps the most exciting time - but I often wonder when it is going to happen. Last I checked the R&amp;D investments by the US Government and US companies were shrinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Steege</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/12/16/hey-transistor-happy-60th-birthday-now-move-over-closer/#comment-779851</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Steege</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 13:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/12/16/hey-transistor-happy-60th-birthday-now-move-over-closer/#comment-779851</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Storage follows a similar law. It's been called Kryder's Law, and states that the number of bits per area doubles every year. Continued growth in storage may be even more important that in processors because the value of content stored there is growing on the same trajectory (or faster) than either physical device.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Storage follows a similar law. It&#8217;s been called Kryder&#8217;s Law, and states that the number of bits per area doubles every year. Continued growth in storage may be even more important that in processors because the value of content stored there is growing on the same trajectory (or faster) than either physical device.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
