Comments on: Amazon SimpleDB 101 & Why It Matters http://gigaom.com/2007/12/14/amazon-simple-db/ Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:10:58 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Peter http://gigaom.com/2007/12/14/amazon-simple-db/#comment-188085 Thu, 24 Jun 2010 20:59:50 +0000 http://gigaom.com/2007/12/14/amazon-simple-db/#comment-188085 It’s reinventing the wheel (or better, going back to pulling sledges) because it turns out there’s a scale where the wheel stops scaling. And the pain of scaling is then harder than the pain of not having the relational stuff. You give up one for the other.

Most sites will never hit that painpoint in scaling, but also, plenty of sites do. And many sites don’t need the relational stuff. So it’s a trade-off.

]]> By: Come sarà il prossimo ecommerce ? http://gigaom.com/2007/12/14/amazon-simple-db/#comment-188084 Tue, 06 Apr 2010 21:52:50 +0000 http://gigaom.com/2007/12/14/amazon-simple-db/#comment-188084 [...] di dati: prodotti da una parte ed informazioni dall’altra. Da leggere l’articolo su GigaOm.com “Amazon simple DB101 and why it matters“.I dati non sono più catalogati nel senso classico, ma conservati in modo più semplice e facile [...]

]]> By: JD Gauchat http://gigaom.com/2007/12/14/amazon-simple-db/#comment-188083 Wed, 13 Jan 2010 15:15:03 +0000 http://gigaom.com/2007/12/14/amazon-simple-db/#comment-188083 Hi. I’m working with SimpleDB because I needed a simple database structure. It work pretty well so far, but I had problems understanding the interface, so I designed a script that takes MySQL sentences and send them to the SimpleDB server.
Here you can find the script and instruction:
http://editorialconquer.com/supersimpledb/

JD

]]> By: Anti-RDBMS: A list of distributed key-value stores by Richard Jones | Bookcold's Blog http://gigaom.com/2007/12/14/amazon-simple-db/#comment-188082 Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:52:27 +0000 http://gigaom.com/2007/12/14/amazon-simple-db/#comment-188082 [...] SimpleDB Service, and some [...]

]]> By: Definition of Cloud Computing – Again – Jim Kaskade http://gigaom.com/2007/12/14/amazon-simple-db/#comment-188081 Sun, 08 Nov 2009 22:37:59 +0000 http://gigaom.com/2007/12/14/amazon-simple-db/#comment-188081 [...] its distribution, partitioning, security and synchronization. New technologies, such as Amazon’s SimpleDB, are part of the answer, not large-scale relational databases. And don’t let the name fool you. [...]

]]> By: dave http://gigaom.com/2007/12/14/amazon-simple-db/#comment-188080 Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:00:34 +0000 http://gigaom.com/2007/12/14/amazon-simple-db/#comment-188080 That was a nice comment exactly expressing my thoughts and feelings. It feels like relational databases 30 years ago and the whole thing like reinventing the wheel.

]]> By: Come sarà il prossimo ecommerce ? | Giovanni Cappellotto http://gigaom.com/2007/12/14/amazon-simple-db/#comment-188079 Tue, 14 Jul 2009 22:24:25 +0000 http://gigaom.com/2007/12/14/amazon-simple-db/#comment-188079 [...] di dati: prodotti da una parte ed informazioni dall’altra. Da leggere l’articolo su GigaOm.com “Amazon simple DB101  and why it matters“.I dati non sono più catalogati nel senso classico, ma conservati in modo più semplice e [...]

]]> By: David Haddad http://gigaom.com/2007/12/14/amazon-simple-db/#comment-188078 Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:03:35 +0000 http://gigaom.com/2007/12/14/amazon-simple-db/#comment-188078 actually there is a 250 items per result set limit.

]]> By: Перевод “Anti-RDBMS: A list of distributed key-value stores” « 13 попугаев http://gigaom.com/2007/12/14/amazon-simple-db/#comment-188077 Sun, 22 Feb 2009 16:32:36 +0000 http://gigaom.com/2007/12/14/amazon-simple-db/#comment-188077 [...] SimpleDB Service, и некоторые [...]

]]> By: Anti-RDBMS: A list of distributed key-value stores | Richard Jones, Esq. http://gigaom.com/2007/12/14/amazon-simple-db/#comment-188076 Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:15:12 +0000 http://gigaom.com/2007/12/14/amazon-simple-db/#comment-188076 [...] SimpleDB Service, and some [...]

]]>