<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Zuckerberg&#039;s Mea Culpa, Not Enough</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/mark-zuckerberg-on-beacon-we-made-mistakes-not-enough/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/mark-zuckerberg-on-beacon-we-made-mistakes-not-enough/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 20:39:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The 5 Stages of a Consumer Web Startup &#171; My Archives</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/mark-zuckerberg-on-beacon-we-made-mistakes-not-enough/#comment-187238</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The 5 Stages of a Consumer Web Startup &#171; My Archives]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/mark-zuckerberg-on-beacon-we-made-mistakes/#comment-187238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] the ad unit might be something novel like awidget, pre-roll voice ads on a mobile phone, or Beacon. Otherwise it’s generally based on banners and Google AdWords with promises of more to [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the ad unit might be something novel like awidget, pre-roll voice ads on a mobile phone, or Beacon. Otherwise it’s generally based on banners and Google AdWords with promises of more to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook Apologizes; Valuation Affected? and Why Isn&#8217;t It On The Profile?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/mark-zuckerberg-on-beacon-we-made-mistakes-not-enough/#comment-187237</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Facebook Apologizes; Valuation Affected? and Why Isn&#8217;t It On The Profile?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 03:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/mark-zuckerberg-on-beacon-we-made-mistakes/#comment-187237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Om gets NYC-style fired up and questions exactly what the change means [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Om gets NYC-style fired up and questions exactly what the change means [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark A.D.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/mark-zuckerberg-on-beacon-we-made-mistakes-not-enough/#comment-187236</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark A.D.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 07:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/mark-zuckerberg-on-beacon-we-made-mistakes/#comment-187236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“THE DARK SIDE OF FACEBOOK, AKA, “DISGRACEBOOK,” OR FACEBOOKS COMPLETE LACK OF CUSTOMER SERVICE”

The unaired dark side of Facebook, or should I call it “Disgracebook” because of the extremely poor disgraceful way Facebook treats its members. The reason I say the unaired dark side of Facebook is I have yet to see anything announced on the prime time major news outlets about the disgraceful practices Facebook uses on its members. The Internet is bursting at its seems with unhappy disabled Facebook members who have posted thousands of complaints everywhere it is possible to post complaints about Facebooks complete lack of customer service and mean spirited disregard for concerns, questions and feedback from members and former members.
If anyone thinks Facebook is “listening” to its members or advertisers or anyone wanting to communicate with them, they simply DO NOT know what they are talking about! Facebook ruthlessly, rigorously, relentlessly, and remorselessly walks all over its members with hob nailed boot polices of culling members from membership for unspecified unknown reasons and then accuses the permanently disabled unacceptable members as “possibly” being guilty of spamming or “possibly” being guilty of harassing other members because of asking too many members to be friends at an unspecified rate. Facebook goes on to permanently disable unacceptable members accounts that have too many friends, belongs to too many groups, pokes too many unknown times, sends too many email messages and on and on and on. The founder of Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg, says that Facebook members seem to take a “personal ownership” of their Facebook accounts. Well, golly gee Mark, Facebook is supposedly a SOCIAL Internet program that people join to meet and make new friends. Making new friends, at least to me, is personal and publishing real photographs and genuine personal information on Facebook seems personal to me. Maybe you should say in your rules and regulations that Facebook wants members to be real and genuine but do not join Facebook for personal reasons and do not expect to be treated in a true genuine caring manner because Facebook does not care in the least about what you think or how you feel. When Facebook says you are guilty of breaking polices you will be treated with complete lack of respect in an impersonal sterile manner and declared unacceptable and permanently banned from Facebook without recourse.

On Mark Zuckerberg’s Facebook Fan Page Mark states “I’m trying to make the world a more open place by helping people connect and share.” I am glad Mark says he is “trying etc.” because, in my opinion, he certainly has NOT accomplished his mission. Facebook is one of the most closed undemocratic uncaring unsocial business operations since the formation of the Gestapo.  Facebook operates carte blanche without regard of a due process of rights for members Facebook deems unacceptable to be a member of its supposed Internet social network service and therefore, disables their account without warning. Facebook justifies its policy and actions under the euphemism of “protecting members” from “repeated actions that COULD BE CONSTRUED as spam,” and from anything Facebook makes up to be a threat to its security. Although Facebook publishes what it SAYS are its rules and regulations, Facebooks security is a computer program of  unpublished nonspecific rules and regulations that are enforced by an automated, autocratic, uncaring broadly defined bureaucratic computer program that members violate without knowing it and then booted out of Facebook.  If this is not Gestapo like policy, I guess I do not know what it is because it certainly is un-American to say the least!

Furthermore, in my opinion, Facebook is NOT a Internet “social network service.” When joining Facebook you are, in reality, joining an Internet money making “computer advertising program” that is set up to look like a  Internet “social network service” for the public.  In essence, the Internet “social network service” is a screen or cover for a “computerized advertising” empire designed with one thing in mind, the bottom line profits for Facebook investors.  I am all for investors making a profit and if the investors will wake up they can increase their profits by paying attention to the consumer members of Facebook.  As it stands now, the consumer is NOT king on Facebook.  Facebook can at any time without having to explain its decision declare any member persona non grata.  Is it any wonder Facebook members are treated with total disregard for being feeling thinking real people?  I have yet to know of a computer program that is able to feel and or to reason. When placing a phone call to Facebook you are treated rudely and crassly informed to use their computerized automated services, which do not reply when used or quickly transferred to an automated answering service to which there is no reply.

Why a business would choose to advertise on “Disgracebook” is beyond my ability to understand sound business practices?  I know that I will not purchase any goods or services advertised on “Disgracebook” and I urge anyone mauled by “Disgracebooks” insensitivity to boycott anything advertised by this disgraceful, despicable, sorry company!

If “Disgracebook” is treating its foreign members as poorly as it treats its domestic members “Disgracebook” is not only giving itself a black eye it is giving the United States of America a black eye. Is there anyone out there who cares enough and can communicate with Facebook to help Facebook  become a user friendly Internet social network service it claims to be?

I strongly urge anyone interested to please research what I am informing you of because I assure you the situation I have explained is the truth and nothing but the truth so help me God.  Until the media and or business community and elected officials takes notice of and makes public “Disgracebooks” dark side inhuman treatment of people Mark Zuckerberg and his staff and money making computer program will continue to execute its  falsely accused  unacceptable members and fill up trenches behind “Disgracebooks” California headquarters with their discarded accounts.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“THE DARK SIDE OF FACEBOOK, AKA, “DISGRACEBOOK,” OR FACEBOOKS COMPLETE LACK OF CUSTOMER SERVICE”</p>
<p>The unaired dark side of Facebook, or should I call it “Disgracebook” because of the extremely poor disgraceful way Facebook treats its members. The reason I say the unaired dark side of Facebook is I have yet to see anything announced on the prime time major news outlets about the disgraceful practices Facebook uses on its members. The Internet is bursting at its seems with unhappy disabled Facebook members who have posted thousands of complaints everywhere it is possible to post complaints about Facebooks complete lack of customer service and mean spirited disregard for concerns, questions and feedback from members and former members.<br />
If anyone thinks Facebook is “listening” to its members or advertisers or anyone wanting to communicate with them, they simply DO NOT know what they are talking about! Facebook ruthlessly, rigorously, relentlessly, and remorselessly walks all over its members with hob nailed boot polices of culling members from membership for unspecified unknown reasons and then accuses the permanently disabled unacceptable members as “possibly” being guilty of spamming or “possibly” being guilty of harassing other members because of asking too many members to be friends at an unspecified rate. Facebook goes on to permanently disable unacceptable members accounts that have too many friends, belongs to too many groups, pokes too many unknown times, sends too many email messages and on and on and on. The founder of Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg, says that Facebook members seem to take a “personal ownership” of their Facebook accounts. Well, golly gee Mark, Facebook is supposedly a SOCIAL Internet program that people join to meet and make new friends. Making new friends, at least to me, is personal and publishing real photographs and genuine personal information on Facebook seems personal to me. Maybe you should say in your rules and regulations that Facebook wants members to be real and genuine but do not join Facebook for personal reasons and do not expect to be treated in a true genuine caring manner because Facebook does not care in the least about what you think or how you feel. When Facebook says you are guilty of breaking polices you will be treated with complete lack of respect in an impersonal sterile manner and declared unacceptable and permanently banned from Facebook without recourse.</p>
<p>On Mark Zuckerberg’s Facebook Fan Page Mark states “I’m trying to make the world a more open place by helping people connect and share.” I am glad Mark says he is “trying etc.” because, in my opinion, he certainly has NOT accomplished his mission. Facebook is one of the most closed undemocratic uncaring unsocial business operations since the formation of the Gestapo.  Facebook operates carte blanche without regard of a due process of rights for members Facebook deems unacceptable to be a member of its supposed Internet social network service and therefore, disables their account without warning. Facebook justifies its policy and actions under the euphemism of “protecting members” from “repeated actions that COULD BE CONSTRUED as spam,” and from anything Facebook makes up to be a threat to its security. Although Facebook publishes what it SAYS are its rules and regulations, Facebooks security is a computer program of  unpublished nonspecific rules and regulations that are enforced by an automated, autocratic, uncaring broadly defined bureaucratic computer program that members violate without knowing it and then booted out of Facebook.  If this is not Gestapo like policy, I guess I do not know what it is because it certainly is un-American to say the least!</p>
<p>Furthermore, in my opinion, Facebook is NOT a Internet “social network service.” When joining Facebook you are, in reality, joining an Internet money making “computer advertising program” that is set up to look like a  Internet “social network service” for the public.  In essence, the Internet “social network service” is a screen or cover for a “computerized advertising” empire designed with one thing in mind, the bottom line profits for Facebook investors.  I am all for investors making a profit and if the investors will wake up they can increase their profits by paying attention to the consumer members of Facebook.  As it stands now, the consumer is NOT king on Facebook.  Facebook can at any time without having to explain its decision declare any member persona non grata.  Is it any wonder Facebook members are treated with total disregard for being feeling thinking real people?  I have yet to know of a computer program that is able to feel and or to reason. When placing a phone call to Facebook you are treated rudely and crassly informed to use their computerized automated services, which do not reply when used or quickly transferred to an automated answering service to which there is no reply.</p>
<p>Why a business would choose to advertise on “Disgracebook” is beyond my ability to understand sound business practices?  I know that I will not purchase any goods or services advertised on “Disgracebook” and I urge anyone mauled by “Disgracebooks” insensitivity to boycott anything advertised by this disgraceful, despicable, sorry company!</p>
<p>If “Disgracebook” is treating its foreign members as poorly as it treats its domestic members “Disgracebook” is not only giving itself a black eye it is giving the United States of America a black eye. Is there anyone out there who cares enough and can communicate with Facebook to help Facebook  become a user friendly Internet social network service it claims to be?</p>
<p>I strongly urge anyone interested to please research what I am informing you of because I assure you the situation I have explained is the truth and nothing but the truth so help me God.  Until the media and or business community and elected officials takes notice of and makes public “Disgracebooks” dark side inhuman treatment of people Mark Zuckerberg and his staff and money making computer program will continue to execute its  falsely accused  unacceptable members and fill up trenches behind “Disgracebooks” California headquarters with their discarded accounts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goodbye Facebook &#8212; fautrever.com: Lance and Erin Willett&#8217;s Outdoor, Travel, and RV Adventures</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/mark-zuckerberg-on-beacon-we-made-mistakes-not-enough/#comment-187235</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Goodbye Facebook &#8212; fautrever.com: Lance and Erin Willett&#8217;s Outdoor, Travel, and RV Adventures]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 06:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/mark-zuckerberg-on-beacon-we-made-mistakes/#comment-187235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] decided to cancel my account even before news of the Beacon catastrophe hit the interwebs, though that exposure certainly helped sealed the deal. As Jeremy Keith pointed out in Facebooked [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] decided to cancel my account even before news of the Beacon catastrophe hit the interwebs, though that exposure certainly helped sealed the deal. As Jeremy Keith pointed out in Facebooked [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook's mea culpa comes at last - Top Stocks Blog: Talk about the most noteworthy stocks in the market each day – MSN Money</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/mark-zuckerberg-on-beacon-we-made-mistakes-not-enough/#comment-187234</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Facebook's mea culpa comes at last - Top Stocks Blog: Talk about the most noteworthy stocks in the market each day – MSN Money]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 00:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/mark-zuckerberg-on-beacon-we-made-mistakes/#comment-187234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] you have to wonder: how many more times are they going to get whacked for similar ventures?&quot;Om Malik: &quot;I think they tried to push the limits, and got some push back, and that’s that. Regardless, had [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you have to wonder: how many more times are they going to get whacked for similar ventures?&#8221;Om Malik: &#8220;I think they tried to push the limits, and got some push back, and that’s that. Regardless, had [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web 2.0 Predictions for 2008 &#171; Think Cow</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/mark-zuckerberg-on-beacon-we-made-mistakes-not-enough/#comment-187233</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Web 2.0 Predictions for 2008 &#171; Think Cow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 04:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/mark-zuckerberg-on-beacon-we-made-mistakes/#comment-187233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] their traffic but struggle to ignite significant revenue growth. Facebook&#8217;s widely covered struggles late last year with the business model of its Beacon product is somewhat indicative of the entire Web 2.0 era: [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] their traffic but struggle to ignite significant revenue growth. Facebook&#8217;s widely covered struggles late last year with the business model of its Beacon product is somewhat indicative of the entire Web 2.0 era: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The 5 Stages of a Consumer Web Startup - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/mark-zuckerberg-on-beacon-we-made-mistakes-not-enough/#comment-187232</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The 5 Stages of a Consumer Web Startup - GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 18:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/mark-zuckerberg-on-beacon-we-made-mistakes/#comment-187232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the ad unit might be something novel like a widget, pre-roll voice ads on a mobile phone, or Beacon. Otherwise it&#8217;s generally based on banners and Google AdWords with promises of more to [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the ad unit might be something novel like a widget, pre-roll voice ads on a mobile phone, or Beacon. Otherwise it&#8217;s generally based on banners and Google AdWords with promises of more to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: December 6, 2007 &#124; TechTV Update</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/mark-zuckerberg-on-beacon-we-made-mistakes-not-enough/#comment-187231</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[December 6, 2007 &#124; TechTV Update]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 06:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/mark-zuckerberg-on-beacon-we-made-mistakes/#comment-187231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Japan does it better.  Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has apologized to unhappy users of Beacon. Om Malik says the apology isn&#8217;t enough. Robert Scoble says the apology is the sign of a real leader.  [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Japan does it better.  Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has apologized to unhappy users of Beacon. Om Malik says the apology isn&#8217;t enough. Robert Scoble says the apology is the sign of a real leader.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who is Robert Knox? Name uses in social services &#8212; Why UI?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/mark-zuckerberg-on-beacon-we-made-mistakes-not-enough/#comment-187230</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Who is Robert Knox? Name uses in social services &#8212; Why UI?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 21:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/mark-zuckerberg-on-beacon-we-made-mistakes/#comment-187230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] in the event - I get a social benefit on top of the activity it self. Facebook has taken this a bit too far with their &quot;Beacon&quot; advertising platform when they used people identity to promote [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the event &#8211; I get a social benefit on top of the activity it self. Facebook has taken this a bit too far with their &quot;Beacon&quot; advertising platform when they used people identity to promote [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Because Facebook Still Sucks</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/mark-zuckerberg-on-beacon-we-made-mistakes-not-enough/#comment-187229</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Because Facebook Still Sucks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 07:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/mark-zuckerberg-on-beacon-we-made-mistakes/#comment-187229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] is, everyone complains out it all the time. Beacon is slammed. It might be popular as hell with my high school cousin and for shits and giggles, but [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is, everyone complains out it all the time. Beacon is slammed. It might be popular as hell with my high school cousin and for shits and giggles, but [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
