<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Trends Predicts Hillary as Dem Nominee</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/google-trends-predicts-hillary-as-demo-nominee/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/google-trends-predicts-hillary-as-demo-nominee/</link>
	<description>The Business of Technology</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 04:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Google Trends is Behind the Curve &#171; Specific Marketing</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/google-trends-predicts-hillary-as-demo-nominee/#comment-888602</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Trends is Behind the Curve &#171; Specific Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/google-trends-predicts-hillary-as-demo-nominee/#comment-888602</guid>
		<description>[...] is sometime heralded as a tool that can help to predict the outcome of future events. I have said before that I think this is unlikely to work, and from what I found today, I believe this even more [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is sometime heralded as a tool that can help to predict the outcome of future events. I have said before that I think this is unlikely to work, and from what I found today, I believe this even more [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Peskett</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/google-trends-predicts-hillary-as-demo-nominee/#comment-860006</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Peskett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 11:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/google-trends-predicts-hillary-as-demo-nominee/#comment-860006</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Looks like it might be time to revisit the Google Trends data, Obama is now the leading search results winner.
http://www.firetop.co.uk/2008/02/04/barack-obama-to-win-super-tuesday/&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like it might be time to revisit the Google Trends data, Obama is now the leading search results winner.<br />
 (<a href="http://www.firetop.co.uk/2008/02/04/barack-obama-to-win-super-tuesday/" rel="nofollow">link</a>) </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomo</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/google-trends-predicts-hillary-as-demo-nominee/#comment-747464</link>
		<dc:creator>tomo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 18:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/google-trends-predicts-hillary-as-demo-nominee/#comment-747464</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I have been tracking the candidates based on various metrics over at this post: http://thetomoreport.blogspot.com/2007/11/2008-presidential-primary-data-tracker.html&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The democrat side the equation seems to be fairly uniform (with Clinton basically winning out in most metrics).  The republican side is completely up for grabs...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been tracking the candidates based on various metrics over at this post:  (<a href="http://thetomoreport.blogspot.com/2007/11/2008-presidential-primary-data-tracker.html" rel="nofollow">link</a>) </p>
<p>The democrat side the equation seems to be fairly uniform (with Clinton basically winning out in most metrics).  The republican side is completely up for grabs&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google trends predict Ron Paul beating Hilary &#124; Global Toad News</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/google-trends-predicts-hillary-as-demo-nominee/#comment-747152</link>
		<dc:creator>Google trends predict Ron Paul beating Hilary &#124; Global Toad News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 15:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/google-trends-predicts-hillary-as-demo-nominee/#comment-747152</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Trend Lines predict Ron Paul will beat Hillary, from his article: According to a GigaOm article Google Trends Predicts Hillary as Dem Nominee, “current Google trend lines show Clinton beating Obama and Edwards.” Unfortunately they [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Trend Lines predict Ron Paul will beat Hillary, from his article: According to a GigaOm article Google Trends Predicts Hillary as Dem Nominee, “current Google trend lines show Clinton beating Obama and Edwards.” Unfortunately they [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Beta Stage &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Brags That Trends is a Predictor of Elections, and I&#8217;m Unconvinced (With Evidence)</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/google-trends-predicts-hillary-as-demo-nominee/#comment-747128</link>
		<dc:creator>The Beta Stage &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Brags That Trends is a Predictor of Elections, and I&#8217;m Unconvinced (With Evidence)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 15:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/google-trends-predicts-hillary-as-demo-nominee/#comment-747128</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] came across an interesting post yesterday written by GigaOM&#8217;s Anne Zelenka, entitled &#8220;Google Trends Predicts Hillary as Dem Nominee.&#8221;  The basic gist of it is that on a Tuesday webcast, Google&#8217;s Marissa Mayer, VP of [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] came across an interesting post yesterday written by GigaOM&#8217;s Anne Zelenka, entitled &#8220;Google Trends Predicts Hillary as Dem Nominee.&#8221;  The basic gist of it is that on a Tuesday webcast, Google&#8217;s Marissa Mayer, VP of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Probst</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/google-trends-predicts-hillary-as-demo-nominee/#comment-746546</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Probst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 11:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/google-trends-predicts-hillary-as-demo-nominee/#comment-746546</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I'm not sure interest alone can predict an election, but unfortunately, name recognition does play a huge role in American politics so it's possible Google Trends has a chance.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Another option that has been incredibly accurate over the years is &lt;a href="http://www.biz.uiowa.edu/iem/" rel="nofollow"&gt;The Iowa Electronic Markets&lt;/a&gt; from The University of Iowa Tippie College of Business.  The markets have shown much greater accurately than the polls you'll see in newspapers and on television.  The main reason for this is because they are real-money markets.  People tend to be a little more honest with themselves when their hard earned money is involved.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure interest alone can predict an election, but unfortunately, name recognition does play a huge role in American politics so it&#8217;s possible Google Trends has a chance.</p>
<p>Another option that has been incredibly accurate over the years is <a href="http://www.biz.uiowa.edu/iem/" rel="nofollow">The Iowa Electronic Markets</a> from The University of Iowa Tippie College of Business.  The markets have shown much greater accurately than the polls you&#8217;ll see in newspapers and on television.  The main reason for this is because they are real-money markets.  People tend to be a little more honest with themselves when their hard earned money is involved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/google-trends-predicts-hillary-as-demo-nominee/#comment-745992</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 06:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/google-trends-predicts-hillary-as-demo-nominee/#comment-745992</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;By this measure Ron Paul will be president. He is far and away the most searched/popular candidate according to Google trends, Tech President, Technorati, Alexa and so on.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By this measure Ron Paul will be president. He is far and away the most searched/popular candidate according to Google trends, Tech President, Technorati, Alexa and so on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rajeev Hirani</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/google-trends-predicts-hillary-as-demo-nominee/#comment-745886</link>
		<dc:creator>Rajeev Hirani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 05:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/google-trends-predicts-hillary-as-demo-nominee/#comment-745886</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hey thanks for this. I discovered about google trends through your blog. Its interesting. Btw one question, do they take into account misspelled searches too? Like in analytics they do not.
Hirani
http://www.goforads.com&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey thanks for this. I discovered about google trends through your blog. Its interesting. Btw one question, do they take into account misspelled searches too? Like in analytics they do not.<br />
Hirani<br />
 (<a href="http://www.goforads.com" rel="nofollow">link</a>) </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ricky</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/google-trends-predicts-hillary-as-demo-nominee/#comment-744872</link>
		<dc:creator>ricky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 20:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/google-trends-predicts-hillary-as-demo-nominee/#comment-744872</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Anne -
 I suspect your culling of only "USA" will not include military personnel abroad -- and am curious what would then happen to the stats;  have these folks traded what is their traditional pro-GOP / anti-Clinton (Bill AND Hillary) play for a pro-Hillary get us out of Iraq play ?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anne -<br />
 I suspect your culling of only &#8220;USA&#8221; will not include military personnel abroad &#8212; and am curious what would then happen to the stats;  have these folks traded what is their traditional pro-GOP / anti-Clinton (Bill AND Hillary) play for a pro-Hillary get us out of Iraq play ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Urquhart</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/google-trends-predicts-hillary-as-demo-nominee/#comment-744716</link>
		<dc:creator>James Urquhart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 19:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/google-trends-predicts-hillary-as-demo-nominee/#comment-744716</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hey, given the success Trends has had in predicting the future, I just figured out what I am always going to play in "rock, paper, scissors"!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://servicelevelautomation.blogspot.com/2007/12/off-topic-its-official-rock-beats-paper.html&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, given the success Trends has had in predicting the future, I just figured out what I am always going to play in &#8220;rock, paper, scissors&#8221;!</p>
<p> (<a href="http://servicelevelautomation.blogspot.com/2007/12/off-topic-its-official-rock-beats-paper.html" rel="nofollow">link</a>) </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeorgeZ</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/google-trends-predicts-hillary-as-demo-nominee/#comment-744698</link>
		<dc:creator>GeorgeZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 19:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/google-trends-predicts-hillary-as-demo-nominee/#comment-744698</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Anne Zelenka
For arguments sake, you need to take a closer to your search of HILARY
http://www.google.com/trends?q=hilary+%7C+hillary%2C+obama&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;the majority of results come form countries below&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Venezuela&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;New Zealand&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Mexico&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Canada&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Australia&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You need to exclude those countries and run the search string properly within the USA, obviously only americans can vote  and obviously  we need to add all mispells of names of both candidates&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;hilary &#124; hillary &#124; hillary clinton &#124; senator hillary clinton, obama &#124; barack obama &#124; barac obama &#124; barak obama &#124; barrack obama&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://www.google.com/trends?q=hilary%2C+hillary%2C+obama&#38;ctab=0&#38;geo=US&#38;geor=all&#38;date=all&#38;sort=0&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Anne Zelenka<br />
For arguments sake, you need to take a closer to your search of HILARY<br />
 (<a href="http://www.google.com/trends?q=hilary+%7C+hillary%2C+obama" rel="nofollow">link</a>) </p>
<p>the majority of results come form countries below</p>
<ol>
<li>
<p>Venezuela</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>New Zealand</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Mexico</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Canada</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Australia</p>
</li>
</ol>
<p>You need to exclude those countries and run the search string properly within the USA, obviously only americans can vote  and obviously  we need to add all mispells of names of both candidates</p>
<p>hilary | hillary | hillary clinton | senator hillary clinton, obama | barack obama | barac obama | barak obama | barrack obama</p>
<p> (<a href="http://www.google.com/trends?q=hilary%2C+hillary%2C+obama&amp;ctab=0&amp;geo=US&amp;geor=all&amp;date=all&amp;sort=0" rel="nofollow">link</a>) </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne Zelenka</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/google-trends-predicts-hillary-as-demo-nominee/#comment-744619</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne Zelenka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 18:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/google-trends-predicts-hillary-as-demo-nominee/#comment-744619</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@GeorgeZ: How many people know that Hillary is spelled that way and not "hilary"?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;How about this: "hilary" or "hillary" (use a vertical bar for or) vs. "Obama"&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://www.google.com/trends?q=hilary+%7C+hillary%2C+obama&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Ha! She wins!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Is that what we're arguing about? ;)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@GeorgeZ: How many people know that Hillary is spelled that way and not &#8220;hilary&#8221;?</p>
<p>How about this: &#8220;hilary&#8221; or &#8220;hillary&#8221; (use a vertical bar for or) vs. &#8220;Obama&#8221;</p>
<p> (<a href="http://www.google.com/trends?q=hilary+%7C+hillary%2C+obama" rel="nofollow">link</a>) </p>
<p>Ha! She wins!</p>
<p>Is that what we&#8217;re arguing about? ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Soubiron</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/google-trends-predicts-hillary-as-demo-nominee/#comment-744615</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Soubiron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 18:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/google-trends-predicts-hillary-as-demo-nominee/#comment-744615</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I totally agree with the majority of the comments. Google, is not in position to predict the result of the elections. Even if the track record indicated is in Google's favor. Bush vs Kerry I would have predicted it also.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with the majority of the comments. Google, is not in position to predict the result of the elections. Even if the track record indicated is in Google&#8217;s favor. Bush vs Kerry I would have predicted it also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeorgeZ</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/google-trends-predicts-hillary-as-demo-nominee/#comment-744603</link>
		<dc:creator>GeorgeZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 18:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/google-trends-predicts-hillary-as-demo-nominee/#comment-744603</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Anne Zelenka&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Yes it is speculation, but then again speculation drives are economy&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;lets try this one "hillary" and "Obama"&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://www.google.com/trends?q=%22hillary%22%2C+%22obama%22&#38;ctab=0&#38;geo=US&#38;geor=all&#38;date=all&#38;sort=0&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Anne Zelenka</p>
<p>Yes it is speculation, but then again speculation drives are economy</p>
<p>lets try this one &#8220;hillary&#8221; and &#8220;Obama&#8221;</p>
<p> (<a href="http://www.google.com/trends?q=%22hillary%22%2C+%22obama%22&amp;ctab=0&amp;geo=US&amp;geor=all&amp;date=all&amp;sort=0" rel="nofollow">link</a>) </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aswath</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/google-trends-predicts-hillary-as-demo-nominee/#comment-744599</link>
		<dc:creator>Aswath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 18:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/google-trends-predicts-hillary-as-demo-nominee/#comment-744599</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Supposing Google has a control group that they monitor before and after, get their disposition and then project to the whole search group, then they can predict what the "posterior" (I hope this doesn't vector into something else) distribution. They can become the next Gallop, with so much data they are sitting and so many PhDs. Does the webcast hint at anything like this? Is there a link to that webcast?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Supposing Google has a control group that they monitor before and after, get their disposition and then project to the whole search group, then they can predict what the &#8220;posterior&#8221; (I hope this doesn&#8217;t vector into something else) distribution. They can become the next Gallop, with so much data they are sitting and so many PhDs. Does the webcast hint at anything like this? Is there a link to that webcast?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theregoesdave</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/google-trends-predicts-hillary-as-demo-nominee/#comment-744578</link>
		<dc:creator>theregoesdave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 18:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/12/05/google-trends-predicts-hillary-as-demo-nominee/#comment-744578</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Are you sure that it's not just a fluke that can be attributed to Christmas shoppers making a mad rush for their Hilary Clinton nutcrackers?
http://hillarynutcracker.com/completelynuts.html&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you sure that it&#8217;s not just a fluke that can be attributed to Christmas shoppers making a mad rush for their Hilary Clinton nutcrackers?<br />
 (<a href="http://hillarynutcracker.com/completelynuts.html" rel="nofollow">link</a>) </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
