<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So Google Will Bid For Spectrum. Will It Play To Win?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/11/30/so-google-will-bid-for-spectrum-will-it-play-to-win/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/30/so-google-will-bid-for-spectrum-will-it-play-to-win/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 03:26:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Google&#8217;s New Fund Should Advance Its Goals, If It Has Them</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/30/so-google-will-bid-for-spectrum-will-it-play-to-win/#comment-935046</link>
		<dc:creator>Google&#8217;s New Fund Should Advance Its Goals, If It Has Them</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/30/so-google-will-bid-for-spectrum-will-it-play-to-win/#comment-935046</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] done well, even the money-losing companies will still advance Google&#8217;s goals, much like its aborted bid on the 700 MHz spectrum still led to open access for devices.    [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] done well, even the money-losing companies will still advance Google&#8217;s goals, much like its aborted bid on the 700 MHz spectrum still led to open access for devices.    [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Verizon Give in to Google on Mobile Search? - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/30/so-google-will-bid-for-spectrum-will-it-play-to-win/#comment-895256</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Verizon Give in to Google on Mobile Search? - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 13:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/30/so-google-will-bid-for-spectrum-will-it-play-to-win/#comment-895256</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] out there. I do find it hard to believe that Verizon would roll over on a deal with the company who caused it such angst during the 700 MHz auction, but perhaps the lure of mobile search dollars is too [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] out there. I do find it hard to believe that Verizon would roll over on a deal with the company who caused it such angst during the 700 MHz auction, but perhaps the lure of mobile search dollars is too [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Claims Less is More on Click-Throughs - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/30/so-google-will-bid-for-spectrum-will-it-play-to-win/#comment-876332</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Claims Less is More on Click-Throughs - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 00:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/30/so-google-will-bid-for-spectrum-will-it-play-to-win/#comment-876332</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] into more enterprise applications, its hopes for monetizing YouTube, mobile phones &#8212; even its particpation in the 700MHz auction. Oh and how it&#8217;s still trying to avoid being [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] into more enterprise applications, its hopes for monetizing YouTube, mobile phones &#8212; even its particpation in the 700MHz auction. Oh and how it&#8217;s still trying to avoid being [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 700MHz bids starts out at $1.24 billion &#8212; $3.36 billion to go for open-access &#171; Techbrothers&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/30/so-google-will-bid-for-spectrum-will-it-play-to-win/#comment-858276</link>
		<dc:creator>700MHz bids starts out at $1.24 billion &#8212; $3.36 billion to go for open-access &#171; Techbrothers&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/30/so-google-will-bid-for-spectrum-will-it-play-to-win/#comment-858276</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] from Reuters via Engadget. They have enter started the Horse race. The Prize is nothing less than world domination. Will this be the beginning of a truly open access network that anyone with the know how can live [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from Reuters via Engadget. They have enter started the Horse race. The Prize is nothing less than world domination. Will this be the beginning of a truly open access network that anyone with the know how can live [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/30/so-google-will-bid-for-spectrum-will-it-play-to-win/#comment-853831</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 15:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/30/so-google-will-bid-for-spectrum-will-it-play-to-win/#comment-853831</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Or google could keep saying they&#039;re bidding the min....then totally slam the competition with a megabucks bid where they&#039;re going to actually win it. The Telecom&#039;s would never see it coming.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;pre&gt;&lt;code&gt;    --Michael
&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or google could keep saying they&#8217;re bidding the min&#8230;.then totally slam the competition with a megabucks bid where they&#8217;re going to actually win it. The Telecom&#8217;s would never see it coming.</p>

<pre><code>    --Michael
</code></pre>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 700 MHz Auction Update - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/30/so-google-will-bid-for-spectrum-will-it-play-to-win/#comment-852290</link>
		<dc:creator>700 MHz Auction Update - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 23:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/30/so-google-will-bid-for-spectrum-will-it-play-to-win/#comment-852290</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] So Google Will Bid for Spectrum, Will It Play to Win? [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So Google Will Bid for Spectrum, Will It Play to Win? [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frontline Out of 700 MHz Auction - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/30/so-google-will-bid-for-spectrum-will-it-play-to-win/#comment-840217</link>
		<dc:creator>Frontline Out of 700 MHz Auction - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/30/so-google-will-bid-for-spectrum-will-it-play-to-win/#comment-840217</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Tuesday, January 8, 2008 at 4:51 PM PT Comments (0)   Frontline Wireless is apparently out of the 700 MHz auction, according to reports from RCR Wireless and the New York Times, as well as an email note from our [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tuesday, January 8, 2008 at 4:51 PM PT Comments (0)   Frontline Wireless is apparently out of the 700 MHz auction, according to reports from RCR Wireless and the New York Times, as well as an email note from our [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Allen, Long-Time Wireless Fan - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/30/so-google-will-bid-for-spectrum-will-it-play-to-win/#comment-819214</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Allen, Long-Time Wireless Fan - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 17:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/30/so-google-will-bid-for-spectrum-will-it-play-to-win/#comment-819214</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] companies to purchase access to wireless subscribers. Google is throwing its hat in, though perhaps that&#8217;s just to shake up the auction and not really make any purchases. Like Google, Allen could just be testing the waters and again not make a serious play for [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] companies to purchase access to wireless subscribers. Google is throwing its hat in, though perhaps that&#8217;s just to shake up the auction and not really make any purchases. Like Google, Allen could just be testing the waters and again not make a serious play for [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Meyer</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/30/so-google-will-bid-for-spectrum-will-it-play-to-win/#comment-739958</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Meyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 22:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/30/so-google-will-bid-for-spectrum-will-it-play-to-win/#comment-739958</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Winning or losing is a matter of who has the better game theorists.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Winning or losing is a matter of who has the better game theorists.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yit</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/30/so-google-will-bid-for-spectrum-will-it-play-to-win/#comment-739861</link>
		<dc:creator>yit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 21:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/30/so-google-will-bid-for-spectrum-will-it-play-to-win/#comment-739861</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Google is always a winner, and they only bid on the important stuff, so if they want something its theirs, nothing to do about it.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google is always a winner, and they only bid on the important stuff, so if they want something its theirs, nothing to do about it.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mm210: Google &#8212; 700MHz gorilla? &#171; Left-handed Complement</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/30/so-google-will-bid-for-spectrum-will-it-play-to-win/#comment-737511</link>
		<dc:creator>mm210: Google &#8212; 700MHz gorilla? &#171; Left-handed Complement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 18:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/30/so-google-will-bid-for-spectrum-will-it-play-to-win/#comment-737511</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Written by Om MalikFriday, November 30, 2007 at 8:07 AM PT Comments (12) [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Written by Om MalikFriday, November 30, 2007 at 8:07 AM PT Comments (12) [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shai Machnes</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/30/so-google-will-bid-for-spectrum-will-it-play-to-win/#comment-737287</link>
		<dc:creator>Shai Machnes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 15:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/30/so-google-will-bid-for-spectrum-will-it-play-to-win/#comment-737287</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Google is not playing to win. They are playing to lose.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;My guess is that Google will bid the minimum to make the new &quot;openness&quot; rules stick, and no more. The last thing they really want is to be a Telco.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;They just want the openness, so that the mobile Internet becomes a reality. More Internet, more search, more online apps, better for Google. Let the Telcos bid high, pay the money and quickly become the bit-pipes Google is aiming for them to be.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;By playing to lose they get want they really want, without paying the big bucks and without the headache of becoming a Telco. A perfect poker bluff.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google is not playing to win. They are playing to lose.</p>

<p>My guess is that Google will bid the minimum to make the new &#8220;openness&#8221; rules stick, and no more. The last thing they really want is to be a Telco.</p>

<p>They just want the openness, so that the mobile Internet becomes a reality. More Internet, more search, more online apps, better for Google. Let the Telcos bid high, pay the money and quickly become the bit-pipes Google is aiming for them to be.</p>

<p>By playing to lose they get want they really want, without paying the big bucks and without the headache of becoming a Telco. A perfect poker bluff.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Cooper&#8217;s Weblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Chat with Ben and Pete - Episode 6</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/30/so-google-will-bid-for-spectrum-will-it-play-to-win/#comment-736894</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Cooper&#8217;s Weblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Chat with Ben and Pete - Episode 6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 11:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/30/so-google-will-bid-for-spectrum-will-it-play-to-win/#comment-736894</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Om Malik on the announcement [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Om Malik on the announcement [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: True Mobility &#171; beanworks</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/30/so-google-will-bid-for-spectrum-will-it-play-to-win/#comment-736290</link>
		<dc:creator>True Mobility &#171; beanworks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 02:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/30/so-google-will-bid-for-spectrum-will-it-play-to-win/#comment-736290</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] next month, can we expect a new player in the U.S. mobile service provider space? Analysts and Silicon Valley journalists aren&#8217;t betting on it. Google and advocacy groups (lobbyists) pushed earlier this year for [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] next month, can we expect a new player in the U.S. mobile service provider space? Analysts and Silicon Valley journalists aren&#8217;t betting on it. Google and advocacy groups (lobbyists) pushed earlier this year for [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mi otro blog&#8230; &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google pujar&#225; por el espectro de 700 MHz en Estados Unidos</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/30/so-google-will-bid-for-spectrum-will-it-play-to-win/#comment-733693</link>
		<dc:creator>Mi otro blog&#8230; &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google pujar&#225; por el espectro de 700 MHz en Estados Unidos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 00:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/30/so-google-will-bid-for-spectrum-will-it-play-to-win/#comment-733693</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] operación a un partner, tal y como se comenta en Wired o si por el contrario, como se comenta en GigaOM, Google no tiene intención de pujar para ganar, ya que es posible que su objetivo fuera que la FCC [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] operación a un partner, tal y como se comenta en Wired o si por el contrario, como se comenta en GigaOM, Google no tiene intención de pujar para ganar, ya que es posible que su objetivo fuera que la FCC [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: U.S. gets Google, we get Ottawa - - mathewingram.com/work</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/30/so-google-will-bid-for-spectrum-will-it-play-to-win/#comment-733680</link>
		<dc:creator>U.S. gets Google, we get Ottawa - - mathewingram.com/work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 23:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/30/so-google-will-bid-for-spectrum-will-it-play-to-win/#comment-733680</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] competition, and as a result more features and lower prices (Om Malik doesn&#8217;t think Google is in it to win it). Will that be the actual outcome, or will it just mean higher handset prices and more attempts to [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] competition, and as a result more features and lower prices (Om Malik doesn&#8217;t think Google is in it to win it). Will that be the actual outcome, or will it just mean higher handset prices and more attempts to [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
