<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Introducing the new look GigaOM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2007/11/23/introducing-the-new-look-gigaom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/23/introducing-the-new-look-gigaom/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:44:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader Feedback Required: The Infrastructure Theories - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/23/introducing-the-new-look-gigaom/#comment-750404</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader Feedback Required: The Infrastructure Theories - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 17:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/23/introducing-the-new-look-gigaom/#comment-750404</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Friday, December 7, 2007 at 9:45 AM PT Comments (0)   With our first conference behind us and the new design almost finished, it is time to focus on the task at hand: writing. I have been wondering about how to tweak the [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Friday, December 7, 2007 at 9:45 AM PT Comments (0)   With our first conference behind us and the new design almost finished, it is time to focus on the task at hand: writing. I have been wondering about how to tweak the [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/23/introducing-the-new-look-gigaom/#comment-734331</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 06:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/23/introducing-the-new-look-gigaom/#comment-734331</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Mr. Malik,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I have one more suggestion,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The last time I checked out Gigaom.com (after the design update), the Font Colour for the Respondents Name was same as that of Comments (at the top, next to the title). I don&#039;t know why, but that RED looked good. And in many ways prompted me to click on the hyperlink of a respective respondent.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Malik,</p>

<p>I have one more suggestion,</p>

<p>The last time I checked out Gigaom.com (after the design update), the Font Colour for the Respondents Name was same as that of Comments (at the top, next to the title). I don&#8217;t know why, but that RED looked good. And in many ways prompted me to click on the hyperlink of a respective respondent.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/23/introducing-the-new-look-gigaom/#comment-724923</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 00:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/23/introducing-the-new-look-gigaom/#comment-724923</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I have to agree with Andrew about the ads, they are horribly distracting. I have a huge monitor and decent resolution and 2/3 of the page is taken up by the header (which includes ads), the right hand ad bar, and the &quot;jobs&quot; insert, which also has an ad. There&#039;s only room for two story snippets! That seems like the wrong balance to me...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with Andrew about the ads, they are horribly distracting. I have a huge monitor and decent resolution and 2/3 of the page is taken up by the header (which includes ads), the right hand ad bar, and the &#8220;jobs&#8221; insert, which also has an ad. There&#8217;s only room for two story snippets! That seems like the wrong balance to me&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/23/introducing-the-new-look-gigaom/#comment-722724</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 04:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/23/introducing-the-new-look-gigaom/#comment-722724</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The earlier one was better. Too wide and doesn&#039;t have the inetersting appeal that I used to have earlier to read.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The earlier one was better. Too wide and doesn&#8217;t have the inetersting appeal that I used to have earlier to read.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: myHimachal</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/23/introducing-the-new-look-gigaom/#comment-721617</link>
		<dc:creator>myHimachal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/23/introducing-the-new-look-gigaom/#comment-721617</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Great look and easy features. Although blue color is all over the web!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great look and easy features. Although blue color is all over the web!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rupinder</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/23/introducing-the-new-look-gigaom/#comment-721405</link>
		<dc:creator>Rupinder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 16:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/23/introducing-the-new-look-gigaom/#comment-721405</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;At last we got more width for the contents ! But it is too heavy on blue.. 
Different colors for heading would be nice...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At last we got more width for the contents ! But it is too heavy on blue.. 
Different colors for heading would be nice&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Foofy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/23/introducing-the-new-look-gigaom/#comment-721331</link>
		<dc:creator>Foofy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 15:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/23/introducing-the-new-look-gigaom/#comment-721331</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ajay:  Sorry about the load time, though the fault lies with us and not WordPress.  We haven&#039;t had time to optimize our new layout properly.  Should improve over the next few days.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ajay:  Sorry about the load time, though the fault lies with us and not WordPress.  We haven&#8217;t had time to optimize our new layout properly.  Should improve over the next few days.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Foofy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/23/introducing-the-new-look-gigaom/#comment-721317</link>
		<dc:creator>Foofy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 15:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/23/introducing-the-new-look-gigaom/#comment-721317</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Steven:  What version of Opera are you using?  I&#039;m using Opera and I don&#039;t see the issue you mention.  Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steven:  What version of Opera are you using?  I&#8217;m using Opera and I don&#8217;t see the issue you mention.  Thanks!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/23/introducing-the-new-look-gigaom/#comment-721298</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 15:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/23/introducing-the-new-look-gigaom/#comment-721298</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The blog entries need more padding on the left side... at least in Opera. The text literally bump up against the side of the application with no padding.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The blog entries need more padding on the left side&#8230; at least in Opera. The text literally bump up against the side of the application with no padding.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ajay</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/23/introducing-the-new-look-gigaom/#comment-720579</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 09:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/23/introducing-the-new-look-gigaom/#comment-720579</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;My two cents on your visual design:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As I said last time you redesigned, I liked the dark blue design you had before that the best, elegant and newsy.  It may have been a bit staid for a tech blogging site but it would have been better to tweak that one, maybe by adding a reddish secondary color, than the other designs you ended up using.  However, with this design, it does look like you&#039;ve gone back in that direction a bit.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Following up on what one of your previous commenters said, I have noticed that the site has been slower to load since you went to wordpress hosting.  Maybe it&#039;s all the ads from the different ad networks slowing the page down, but I&#039;d suggest hosting elsewhere as the site doesn&#039;t seem to be as responsive at wordpress.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My two cents on your visual design:</p>

<p>As I said last time you redesigned, I liked the dark blue design you had before that the best, elegant and newsy.  It may have been a bit staid for a tech blogging site but it would have been better to tweak that one, maybe by adding a reddish secondary color, than the other designs you ended up using.  However, with this design, it does look like you&#8217;ve gone back in that direction a bit.</p>

<p>Following up on what one of your previous commenters said, I have noticed that the site has been slower to load since you went to wordpress hosting.  Maybe it&#8217;s all the ads from the different ad networks slowing the page down, but I&#8217;d suggest hosting elsewhere as the site doesn&#8217;t seem to be as responsive at wordpress.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Time for a makeover? &#171; Market Like You Mean It</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/23/introducing-the-new-look-gigaom/#comment-720128</link>
		<dc:creator>Time for a makeover? &#171; Market Like You Mean It</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 04:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/23/introducing-the-new-look-gigaom/#comment-720128</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] the top of my head, I can think of MSNBC.com, Amazon.com, Freelance Switch, GigaOM and Web Worker Daily that have recently redesigned (or realigned for those in the know). I&#8217;ve [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the top of my head, I can think of MSNBC.com, Amazon.com, Freelance Switch, GigaOM and Web Worker Daily that have recently redesigned (or realigned for those in the know). I&#8217;ve [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noel Hurtley</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/23/introducing-the-new-look-gigaom/#comment-719032</link>
		<dc:creator>Noel Hurtley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 17:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/23/introducing-the-new-look-gigaom/#comment-719032</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Nice work! What an improvement. I used to avoid visiting GigaOM (only to subscribe to the feed) because of the slow, cluttered web-site.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I especially like the typography and the content layout.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice work! What an improvement. I used to avoid visiting GigaOM (only to subscribe to the feed) because of the slow, cluttered web-site.</p>

<p>I especially like the typography and the content layout.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefano Buliani</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/23/introducing-the-new-look-gigaom/#comment-718812</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefano Buliani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 14:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/23/introducing-the-new-look-gigaom/#comment-718812</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Looks great! Gave me so much grief finding a decent wordpress theme supporting the widgets I need. The only option seems to be the default one which as everybody says does not give enough space to the content in the main column.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Really slick, well done!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks great! Gave me so much grief finding a decent wordpress theme supporting the widgets I need. The only option seems to be the default one which as everybody says does not give enough space to the content in the main column.</p>

<p>Really slick, well done!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/23/introducing-the-new-look-gigaom/#comment-718745</link>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 14:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/23/introducing-the-new-look-gigaom/#comment-718745</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Steven Ray and @ Ethan&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;the problem of logo - ad is being addressed right now though it might take a day or two to roll out.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;the nav bar is going to go through some minor changes to clarify everything. hope to get this right soon enough.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Steven Ray and @ Ethan</p>

<p>the problem of logo &#8211; ad is being addressed right now though it might take a day or two to roll out.</p>

<p>the nav bar is going to go through some minor changes to clarify everything. hope to get this right soon enough.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethan Bdnar</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/23/introducing-the-new-look-gigaom/#comment-718718</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethan Bdnar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 14:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/23/introducing-the-new-look-gigaom/#comment-718718</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Om,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Just thought I would let you know that the site look great. 
It is hard to realize that the other sites in the navigation bar at the top aren&#039;t just other pages on this site.
We all know but first time visitors might not. And then the &quot;am&quot; and &quot;pm&quot; in the comments are on the second line down. Overall great work.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Om,</p>

<p>Just thought I would let you know that the site look great. 
It is hard to realize that the other sites in the navigation bar at the top aren&#8217;t just other pages on this site.
We all know but first time visitors might not. And then the &#8220;am&#8221; and &#8220;pm&#8221; in the comments are on the second line down. Overall great work.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Entreprenews of the Week -- Young Go Getter</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2007/11/23/introducing-the-new-look-gigaom/#comment-718673</link>
		<dc:creator>Entreprenews of the Week -- Young Go Getter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 13:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2007/11/23/introducing-the-new-look-gigaom/#comment-718673</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Introducing the new look GigaOM Om&#8217;s site went under the knife a couple days ago and ditched the cluttered look for a slick, clean approach. I like it much better, but do think it could still use some refinement. What do you think? [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Introducing the new look GigaOM Om&#8217;s site went under the knife a couple days ago and ditched the cluttered look for a slick, clean approach. I like it much better, but do think it could still use some refinement. What do you think? [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
